• algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Capitalism may hold us back in some regards but really helps in others.

    The majority of people would likely be feudal peasants, working under a warmonger family that owns the sustaining land by force. No upward mobility except through bloodshed.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        When you lack the imagination to think about how it could be worse, you can still get the detailed descriptions of it from history.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yet you’re still desperately trying so it’s obvious our suffering is valid and that you can’t just invalidate it by comparing our situation to that of people 500-600 years ago, can you?

                  You can keep trying to get one over on me, though. I suppose it’ll take the sting out of the last two times you failed. 🍿

                  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    No, stopping requires your will. It’s your decision. That’s called “freedom” and it’s an aspect of your life a feudal peasant wouldn’t have.

                    I’m not trying to invalidate your suffering. You are trying to invalidate those people’s suffering, by claiming their lives were just as easy as ours. Which they weren’t. Those people went through shit we can’t imagine.

    • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The majority of people would likely be are feudal peasants, working under a warmonger family that owns the sustaining land by force. No upward mobility except through bloodshed.

      FTFY

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Capitalism optimizes for efficiency. Sadly slavery is terribly efficient in terms of economics. Therefore capitalism needs to be capped by society at certain acceptable limits. Which is called socioeconomics and its not perfect but the best system we have. insert handwavy remark about whatever america is doing here

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Capitalism is based on free exchange and wage labor. Unless a slave has volunteered to be a slave, using a slave is not “free exchange”.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        the problem with this is that we depend on the capitalist overlords to keep their pinky promise of not fucking with our rights.

        right now they are breaking it again because they can.

        i also don’t think having the majority of the money/value going to a few owners is efficient at all.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thats still in a sense a commerce based system. The only reason that warlord fights for that land is because it has value, be it food, a cash crop, a strategic location.

      Warlords hoarded land and power in similar ways billionaires hoard money and power.

    • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Capitalism optimises for concentrating resources.

      Dividends, return on investment, profits, etc. are all inefficiencies in the production of value, and require more resources, labor, and suffering per unit of value than for example a circular economy.

      But it does concentrate wealth efficiently, which in turn gives access to enough resources to start larger ventures.