Another chance for the Brits to get rid of this weird institution.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Heh, that’s a good one. They are planning to send something to those countries already, but it’s immigrants.

      Anyway, at this point some say the British royals are a net benefit for the country as a tourist attraction. Paris has Disneyland, London has Buckingham… 🤷

      • Laconic@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        French palaces make money without supporting the austentacious lifestyle of monarcht.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The “ostentatious lifestyle” is what drives the souvenir market.

          You go to Buckingham, and can buy all sorts of random junk with a photo of the monarchs, royal symbols, and whatnot. They’re even collectible!

          Last time I was at Versalles, they were selling… hat umbrellas. Like, seriously? Come on, at least sell some toy guillotines with a series of monarchs with detachable heads, or something… but that seems to be too grim for the general public, so… hat umbrellas. 🙄

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They do have a lot more soft power over the government than many give them credit for though, plus some (so far) unused actual power that they only don’t use by tradition (which these days is more clearly a bad idea to rely on than ever). Plus all there’s all that money that goes into the pageantry of it (royal weddings, etc).

        I feel like it’s be one thing to let them keep their royal titles, but they shouldn’t be enmeshed with the state in any actual way imo.