• boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Meh. Haavisto has better experience and less fuckups but money works in campaigns. Anyway it was two right-wingers in the second round so

    • TaTTe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      In what sense is Haavisto right-wing? Also, compared to most global leaders, Stubb is not very far right. Luckily all the far right lunatics fell out in the first round.

      But yeah, I agree Haavisto would have been the better choice, although both of them are very competent for the role.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        both of them are very competent for the role.

        well la de da mr “functioning electoral system” over here

    • theinspectorst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Anyway it was two right-wingers in the second round so

      A centrist, europhile, pro-immigration, pro-multiculturalism, former patron of Helsinki’s Pride event, vs the literal Green League candidate.