• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, we could probably take the 15000 or so children off the number, I would guess.

      • admin@lemmy.mohammadodeh.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Given their religion

        Definitely not an argument against a specific point, but a generalization against an entire population. Pretty much ad hominem on a large scale.

        What a bigot with no actual argument. Begone now and thank you 😘

        Bye

        • mellowheat@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I offered an actual argument with actual data from an impartial source. You seem to have twisted my words in the second paragraph that were directed at Islamist terrorists to encompass a whole population.

          Being angry at me for saying this does not help. Be angry at them who cynically employ these strategies. If you are a muslim yourself, you’re at a much better position to make a positive change than I, being a western atheist, am.

          Bye

          Are you yogthos?

          • admin@lemmy.mohammadodeh.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Offering your opinion as an “actual argument with actual data” and a link to amnesty international does NOT constitute a coherent, well formed argument.

            Reporting me with “uncivil comment” only shows your evasiveness to real discourse and that you will try to silence and put down anyone that disagrees with because you have no real argument to offer.

            Good luck in the real world buddy, you’ll need it.

            • mellowheat@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Offering your opinion as an “actual argument with actual data” and a link to amnesty international does NOT constitute a coherent, well formed argument.

              Give me your definition of a well-formed argument, then. I also haven’t seen your argument based on data, just badmouthing me.

              Uncivility is the reason I report things, not bad opinions or arguments. The latter is acceptable because correcting those that’s the only way people can learn. Uncivility is unacceptable, since that only causes harm. If you don’t see how you were uncivil, I suggest you go read your comment more carefully.

              For instance

              Good luck in the real world buddy, you’ll need it.

              Uncivil. Do you see it now? Thanks to federation, you can imagine your own rules in your own server obviously, but it doesn’t remove the fact of how you’re behaving.

              I would also call out how unclassy it is to make rude comments on regular threads with an “admin” account, but that’s another one of your freedoms of running your own instance. But if you keep doing that, at some point other admins will start blocking your instance.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think you can use a PDF from 2004 as evidence of anything Hamas is doing currently. They weren’t even voted in to power until 2007.

      • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What a leap of faith #justaskingquestions guesture towards a conclusion during a time where there is really no way to know.

        Curb your bias.