Would be irresponsible not to be tracking keywords ‘round the web… imagine if this discussion were “new Google Search CSAM exploit”! But I do expect some level of engagement really helps the odds of discussions being raised to a company’s attention, so you’re right it’s not a guarantee.
>not rage bait
>likely that someone that works at Google could see this
> and fix the issue.
Your statements are funny.
It’s literally on “mildly infuriating”
It’s not likely that a Google programmer who works on search results would see it
And further then make changes to whatever response database and further have access and the go-ahead to do so
Aren’t they likely to see brand mentions?
Same principle:
Would be irresponsible not to be tracking keywords ‘round the web… imagine if this discussion were “new Google Search CSAM exploit”! But I do expect some level of engagement really helps the odds of discussions being raised to a company’s attention, so you’re right it’s not a guarantee.
deleted by creator
“you have to have a better idea then mine in order to show that me saying something is not ragebait and is LIKELY is wrong”
No