• NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Literally yes if the temporary ceasefire will just let Israel continue their genocide in six weeks. Hamas has been pretty clear they won’t accept anything less than a permanent ceasefire (or as permanent as one with Israel can get) after the mess that is the last one.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Let’s let Hamas themselves figure out what they’re going to do. Sinwar doesn’t mind sacrificing anyone, but he may have changed his mind. It seems you want a ceasefire, but only under your conditions. It desn’t work that way.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I would prefer an actual permanent ceasefire and an end to the decade long permanent occupation. I would prefer the apartheid state to be dismantled and a new state with equal rights for both Israelis and Palestinians to take its place.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        10 months ago

        You apparently have a lot 9f experience negotiating these things, so does peace happen step by step or all in one Leap?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The time to say that was before the last ceasefire. And before Israel explicitly stated they’ll attack Rafah, with or without a ceasefire.