• WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    They must fight their own battle…

    To what end? Is this stance worth losing a free nation to Russia if only supporting via arms isn’t enough anymore?

    I’m honestly curious why you feel this way.

    For me, generally, I don’t really enjoy the idea of sending our military into places like the Middle East; at best we’re teetering on the line of actually being the aggressors in those conflicts, and at worst actually are just clearly at fault. But I kind of think, for once, the issue at hand in Ukraine is pretty cut and dry at this point. If push came to shove and they really desperately needed support from allies, I can’t think of a more righteous use of our military than to defend Ukraine.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m honestly curious why you feel this way

      It’s not our battle to fight. If you want to die for Ukraine, sign up. I have no desire to die for Ukraine. Most Americans don’t want to die for Ukraine. I’d resign my commission if called up for Ukraine.

      Give them weapons and let them win their own fight.

      Europe has an interest in defending Ukraine as they may be next but it’s of no interest of ours.

      • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not just about Ukraine, that was clear two years ago. It’s about European stability and alliances with other democracies. If Europe falls to authoritarians the US will be isolated and vulnerable.

        Americans should support Ukraine out of self interest if nothing else.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Europe isn’t going to fall. If Russia attacks a NATO nation, then we have an obligation to get involved.

          • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s presumably true now, although certainly a lot of uncertainty surrounds it. What about in 20 years after another couple decades or Kremlin propaganda on social media?

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              By then, Putin will be dead. Fingers crossed, Russia will get someone better in the next round.

              Putin doesn’t have twenty years if the rumors are true. Five at the most.

              • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                There are others just as bad and worse ready to replace Putin.

                Would you expect that when a mob boss dies they replace him with a benevolent leader?

      • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Interesting stance.

        So, not to throw around too many hypotheticals, but it sounds like by your logic you also would have been opposed to our participation in World War II as well?

        I’m just trying to parse your train of thought here.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          We were attacked by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor. We had no choice but to enter the war. Germany declared war on America after the attack.