• dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Somebody has got to explain to me how being a for-profit company with investors doesn’t categorically make it impossible for a company to produce anything other than a product and an open social network that has no bottlenecks or levers of power to monetize to the degree required to return on a huge investment is NOT a product.

    It is a prototype for a product that happens to be selling itself to early adopters on a promise it can never keep if it wants to be a successful product.

    Bluesky promising to commit to a truly open federated structure is in a poetic sense the exact same thing as Pete Buttigieg promising to support Medicare for all.

    In other words, why should I trust you bluesky when I can just pick literally anybody else who I actually have some reason to believe will do anything other than serve the status quo while smiling and saying words I like (which for nerds is nerding out about the AT protocol while entirely ignoring the obvious power dynamics, politics and end goal at play here).

    I am not questioning the motivations of the developers of bluesky doing most of the labor, but they will never truly have a say in the direction of bluesky because they are building something for someone else to own whether they realize that is why they have such a good paycheck or not.