The latest incident came hours after eight people were killed in an airstrike on an aid distribution centre at al-Nuseirat camp in central Gaza, health officials said.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The IDF reports

    Non-credible biased source that has been known to habitually lie to further their narrative. Probably doing it again here.

    As per the IDF’s investigation

    Again, notoriously untrustworthy source. It’s like trusting American cops to investigate each other. You’re not getting the truth that way.

    The IDF states

    Common precursor to a bunch of lies

    The IDF also observed made up

    Much more likely

    the IDF concluded that its forces did not fire at the aid convoy

    Surprise surprise, more IDF lies that shifts the blame away from themselves, contrary to the reports of more credible sources.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      You will only believe what you want to believe, right? You will only look at information you agree with.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s rich coming from someone quoting a tweet about statements from the IDF about something that happened in Gaza 😂

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Quoted in a string that is very much is to the contrary. Rich, huh. You want video?

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            You want video?

            Considering the source, no thanks. Video can be deceptively edited and otherwise doctored, which the propaganda arm of the IDF have been known to consistently do.

            That you trust the IDF as a source in spite of their well-documented history of constant distortions amd outright fabrication makes it clear that you readily swallow horse shit and don’t understand why people don’t automatically agree that it’s actually prime beef.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              That’s right, you only look at sources that agree with you. The contrary view is not considered and in fact discounted. You don’t want to see it because you may be deceived, when in fact you never consider you may already be deceived. Listen, I really don’t care what you believe. I am simply disrupting the chat box people like you enjoy. Carry on.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                That’s right, you only look at sources that agree with you.

                Not trusting a source with the reliability equivalent of The Daily Mail has nothing to do with whether I “agree”. That’s just a strawman you keep trotting out because you can’t defend your awful source.

                Bias and source skepticism are not the same thing and pretending so is the refuge of people promoting poorly sourced bullshit.