UN Security Council passes resolution calling for an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, as US shifts position by abstaining from vote

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      USA because it took this many decades to merely abstain and and not veto.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The best time to abstain would have been decades ago, but the second-best time is now. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good; this was a good choice.

        Edit: The downvotes are hard to interpret. Do people think the US abstaining (and thus allowing the resolution to pass) was not a good choice?

        • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          this was a good choice.

          Abstention is, by definition, the refusal to make a choice. And if you are not against oppression, then you favor the status quo.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s not how it actually works, though. They knew that by not opposing it would result in the measure passing. Choosing to abstain is a choice.

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m not saying there is. Obviously not.

                To be absolutely clear for those who for some reason still aren’t understanding it at this point, choosing to abstain from voting on this resolution was the same as voting to support it. The US could have blocked this resolution and instead decided “no, we’ll let this one through.” Given that they could have blocked it but made a conscious decision not to block it, knowing that by not blocking it the resolution would pass, that was a decision in favor of this resolution.

                What do people think I am saying, if not that?

                  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    They chose a course of action that allowed the right thing to happen.

                    As I said above, don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

                  • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Do you understand the political mess involved in the ties between USA and Israel? There’s multiple factions whose support is conditional on WH supporting Israel. Biden isn’t just negotiating with Netanyahu, he’s negotiating with the rest of his own party and donors. He wouldn’t be able to vote for in UN without consequences, like political factions and donors moving to R instead.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’ve been vetoing, the proper action would have been to vote to pass.