UN Security Council passes resolution calling for an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, as US shifts position by abstaining from vote

  • AdeptusPrimaris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So the ceasefire is only for two weeks. No wonder the US abstained.

    Edit: the ceasefire is for the rest of Ramadan, the rest of Ramadan is about two weeks.

      • AdeptusPrimaris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Absolutely not. That’s why when i heard the US abstained i had to double check why, and predictably it was because of the length of the ceasefire.

        Also, demanding the change of language from ‘permanent’ ceasefire to ‘sustained’ ceasefire was scummy and probably also part of the reason why they abstained and let the vote pass.

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Nah man, the previous one gave Israel/USA impunity to “finish the war”

          This one actually counts as a ceasefire, hence their vote.

          • AdeptusPrimaris@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh, i think i see what you mean? Yes, the fact that it does count as an actual ceasefire is a good thing.

            Sorry if I’m not understanding, english isn’t my first language.

            • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Zhang Jun, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of China to the UN, thanked the E-10 Council members for their efforts on the draft.

              Noting that his country’s negative vote on the US-led draft resolution last Friday, he stated that a comparison of the two drafts showed the differences:

              “The current draft is unequivocal and correct in its direction, demanding an immediate ceasefire, while the previous one was evasive and ambiguous,” he said, adding that the present resolution also reflected the general expectations of the international community and enjoyed the collective support of Arab nations.

              • AdeptusPrimaris@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ah i see what you mean, thanks for the clarification. Yes, i agree with you there on why they voted the way they did.