• vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the world that you know: the world as it was at the end of the 20th century. It exists now only as a part of a neural-interactive simulation that we call the Matrix… We have only bits and pieces of information, but what we know for certain is that at some point in the early 21st century, all of mankind was united in celebration.

      We marveled at our own magnificence as we gave birth to AI: a singular consciousness that spawned an entire race of machines. We don’t know who struck first, us or them, but we know that it was us that scorched the sky. At the time, they were dependent on solar power, and it was believed that they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the sun.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which was really sooooo dumb. “At the time they were reliant on solar power…” as if we aren’t 🙄

      I love those movies but their joke thermodynamics are simply atrocious.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t that specifically in reference to the machines? So the viewer knows that they weren’t relying on fossil fuels and access to sunlight would be their weakness.

      • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The original plot of the movie was that humans were not an energy source but the computing substrate; that all those brains were networked together as a meat-based platform for the AIs to run on, which is why Neo was able to change reality in the Matrix, because he was able to override the programming for the chunk running on him at any given time, just by thinking it.

        But the fucking mouthbreathers they got in for their focus groups didn’t get the concept, so they had to rewrite it, demoting humans to freaking lemon-batteries and making a mockery of the whole thing.

        Yes I’m bitter.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t blame the focus group participants in that scenario. Maybe using brains as a computing platform is only confusing to morons (which I doubt), but that doesn’t mean they needed to leap to a flatly nonsensical alternative.

          I’ve heard this one commonly suggested as a “that would have been better” but was it actually the original script? Is there a source on this?