• jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agree in principle, but there is a place for digital money. That’s why it’s viable and sensible to pay for web services like VPNs, hosting, domains, with Monero.

      Low cost transactions to allow for micropayments make sense with a low cost digital currency.

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh, Monero is what you’re selling shilling?

        But yes, while there is a place for digital money that doesn’t equal cryptocurrency. For instance, I haven’t held physical legal tender in my hands in ages. All my purchases go through online banking systems (via credit cards or my bank’s web ui) and I don’t even remember what my local bank notes look like anymore.

        The big difference is that established banking system (which I have my own reservations about) have checks, failsafes and customer securities to ensure that when the next crash comes, we have some chance to recover our losses.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No need to insult me.

          Those checks and fail-safes have value but come at a cost. Middlemen want their cut. So it doesn’t make sense to have micro transactions online, so there is a gap in the market for quick low cost low value payments.

          • ericjmorey@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Crypto has a huge cost per transaction in comparison to just about any other system in place which provide more services and protections.