• CausticFlames@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Google having their own proprietary crap embedded in their version doesnt make AOSP not FOSS.

        Thats the entirety of the basis for things like GrapheneOS, despite Google gobbling it up.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not technically no, though neither does it fully embrace the spirit of FOSS either. Anyway I was explaining the appearance of those two being at odds with one another in the meme. Anyone who does not enjoy meme content can simply block this community and move on with the serious side of life.:-)

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            it can always be forked as a project that does. this is part of the point of foss and why you should be using lineage or graphene instead if you care about this

            • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              yeah, again, just like Chromium technically speaking.

              Let’s use the lesser, Foss version of Google’s product so they can continue to have a monopoly, so then later they can force you to install a proprietary blob or account apps or services need.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                nothing lesser about grapheneos or lineageos at all.

                but im all ears if you have a usable alternative for a foss phone.

                • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.todayOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  nothing lesser about grapheneos or lineageos at all.

                  iirc there are problems with trying to use some mainstream apps on these operating systems. When I say lesser I don’t mean to demean them, I mean they’re the lesser used and not really known about alternative and thus not really supported unless you can live your life in f-droid which if so, kudos to you, you’re livin’ the dream.

                  but im all ears if you have a usable alternative for a foss phone.

                  https://postmarketos.org/

          • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            Correct me if I’m wrong but does FOSS not simply mean the following?

            software that is available under a license that grants the right to use, modify, and distribute the software, modified or not, to everyone free of charge

            source: Wikipedia

            From my understanding AOSP’s license grants all those rights. I think what you might be opposed to is that it isn’t developed out in the open, which is a fair criticism.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Well, they wrote the “spirit of FOSS” and you pulled out a completely sterile definition, which has no spirit at all.

              At the very least, even with that sterile definition, embracing the spirit would mean making all the software you’re distributing FOSS. Instead, Google has been doing all kinds of bundle deals and whatnot to ensure that most distributions of their FOSS software come with their proprietary parts.

              However, going further in embracing the spirit, particularly the “free software” part of FOSS is idealistic. It doesn’t just fulfill that definition to fulfill that definition. Rather, it sees that definition as the baseline, to help ensure that the freedom of users is respected.

              AOSP, despite being under an appropriate license, does not respect that freedom.
              For example, many users would want their keyboard app (which has access to their typed passwords) to not have internet access. AOSP has a myriad of permissions, but not for internet access, since Google wants their ads to be displayed.

              In theory, the license ensures that AOSP can be forked, and Custom ROMs do soft-fork it (i.e. make slight amendments to what Google puts out), but due to how much development Google puts into Android rather than there being a development community, it’s effectively not viable for anyone to truly hard-fork AOSP (i.e. take it into a new direction, independent from Google).