It’s like camouflage, but for stairs.

Make that two.

Agile tries to solve this differently.

First and foremost, it puts you into tight-knit communication with your team and the customers, so just ask if anyone remembers why it is like that.

If no one does, then Agile enables to basically fuck around and find out.

Which is to say, change it to how you think it’s supposed to be and see if anything breaks / anyone complains. If that happens, Agile allows you to react quickly, i.e. to change it back and quickly release a fixed version.

But yeah, as the others said, if your team feels like documents work better for them, then do Agile and documents. That’s why retrospectives are an integral part of Agile, because it’s not a perfect plan how to work together. You’ll know best what works in your context.

Basically anything that has to do with:

• story telling / plot
• world building / lore
• pacing, cinematics
• art style, music selection
• atmosphere, jump scares

Yeah, I’ve considered, whether you could boil all games down to three aspects:

• puzzle
• reaction
• flavor

But yeah, still really reductive and I’m not sure, this is useful in any way. 🙃

I guess, it would be this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_percussion_instrument

Well, if you’re actively starving, then obviously you won’t get enough. And if you’re only eating e.g. rice, then you’d likely be satiated before you have enough of certain amino acids. But aside from that, it’s quite difficult to not get enough protein, as carb-heavy food also contains protein.

I can recommend listening to this podcast/video for a more detailed explanation: https://zoe.com/learn/podcast-should-i-eat-more-protein

This professor disagrees with you: https://zoe.com/learn/podcast-should-i-eat-more-protein

I can’t really cite a specific portion, as he explains how the whole RDA works, how much we eat and how plants’ amino acids work across the whole length, but frankly, the whole podcast/video is worth listening to.

But well, to cite at least the conclusion:

Yes, you can absolutely meet all your needs on a completely plant-based diet, stop obsessing about protein.

Well, now it’s gone full circle. The post you linked was created, because I had original commented that diagram elsewhere: https://slrpnk.net/post/10599814/9313177

🙃

The infos in your comment aren’t wrong, but it’s missing a crucial point: If you live in a developed country, you’re likely eating 2-4 times as much protein as you actually need.

Even when a certain legume has only 70% as much content of a certain amino acid, if you eat double than what you need, you still reach 140%.

Probably should also be noted that you’re almost certainly eating more than plenty protein, no matter what you do.
As in, for medical reasons, when people have a dodgy liver, it’s helpful to reduce protein intake to what they actually need, but with how much protein our usual diet contains, it’s really difficult to get there.

Interesting podcast/video on the topic: https://zoe.com/learn/podcast-should-i-eat-more-protein

Yeah, I’ve got two packets of tofu at home and they list 12g and 15g of protein per 100g…

Hey now, they do kill everyone equally. Whether you’re an LGBTQtie or nah.

FUTO’s The Open Source Definition

Open source just means access to the source code. […]

What is wrong with this company? How do you have the thought and then follow all the way through with it, that you need an own definition of a commonly used word? That’s just being obtuse and annoying.

My bet is on beeswax for the non-vegan ingredient.

Hmm, okay, that seems more reasonable then. I didn’t know they had a recipe book built-in these days.

And well, at least you don’t need wolf armor, so even if you never find armadillos, it’s not a problem.

I’m not saying there shouldn’t be puzzles. I’m criticizing that this puzzle is impossible to solve.
No one will wish to protect their dog and then realize they need to place 6 armadillo scutes in a chair-like pattern into a crafting grid.

Some might try to brute-force crafting patterns with armadillo scutes, but that is not fun.
And just looking up what to do with armadillo scutes, that is not fun either.

Right, I even forgot about horse armor. That’s been in there for a while, but I’d remove that item, too. I have been doing Minetest, so that’s probably where all the opinions come from. 😅

I mean, I can get behind that. It doesn’t increase gameplay complexity and people enjoy having their doggos in different colors.

But adding a whole new mob and items for one specific niche purpose, that increases complexity quite a bit. New players will have no idea what to do with the armadillo drops, without looking it up or being told by that AI narrator thing, I guess.

I did not keep up with Minecraft over the years, only just looked into this now, but yeah, this seems so arbitrary. There’s a mob (armadillos), then an intermediate item (armadillo scutes) and the only usage for that is crafting wolf armor.

Whatever happened to not having a million different items? Like, that’s pretty much game design 101, to combine mechanics where possible. They could have allowed equipping a leather body armor on a wolf for the same gameplay mechanic.
But it really does look like they wanted to add some animal for the publicity and then needed to shoehorn any purpose at all for it.