• NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You have completely flipped the context of the quote. It’s not just comfort for comforts sake, it’s also a way of protesting the 996 work culture of China.

    The article is definitely stating that this is a protest, your quote is about a fringe benefit.

    Social media users have joked that if you wear your favorite outfit to work, it’ll be contaminated by the “Ban Wei” as the office vibe creeps into your personal life.

    The remaining option: wear your gross clothes to the office.

    Candise Lin who creates content on TikTok exploring cultural trends in China, broke down this viral trend in a recent video.

    She used an example of one blogger who said that they only wears clothes with holes in them to work to reflect their “crappy job and shabby pay.”

    Clearly stated like 2 paragraphs after your quote.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s good to see you and so many people supporting the good things the ccp have done like ban and crack down on antisocial working practices like 996

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It is definitely protest. But they choose these outfit to protest because they are comfortable, as oppose to vampires costume, which would also violate the dress code.

      This is related to what OP is saying. These outfit already exists because of toxic work culture, they are taking it to the extreme.

      • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Pick a position and stick with it for more than a single comment:

        It is not protest for the sake of protest, but mostly “convenience”.

        It is a protest using existing social expectations of dress code, it’s not just about comfort.

        “Protest for the sake of protest” is nonsense. By definition they’re doing it for the sake of something. That something is not convenience, it’s the 996 work culture like the subject of the article.