The Senate on Tuesday passed a long-delayed $95 billion package with wide bipartisan support after both sides of Capitol Hill have struggled for months to send aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

The final vote was 79-18. Fifteen Republicans voted with three Democrats against the bill. Forty-eight Democrats and 31 Republicans voted for the bill.

The legislation next goes to President Joe Biden to sign it into law, who said he would sign the package Wednesday. Its passage is a significant victory for the US president, congressional Democrats and Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, who long pushed to send aid to Ukraine even as the right wing of his party increasingly soured on support for Kyiv.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly, a standalone Ukrainian bill wouldn’t have passed the senate, like wise an Israeli bill wouldn’t either. Neither by themselves would make it past the 60 vote fillabuster margin, so a compromise was made to throw them all together to get past the fillabuster. This all could have happened way sooner but Trump and the hardliners didn’t want the border issue solved.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So according to this logic, two negatives makes a positive? Israel wouldn’t deserve funding on its own, nor Ukraine, but together they should? How does that work, exactly? I’m lost.

        (Also f**k Israel. ✊)

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Rs wanted Israel funding, Ds wanted Ukraine funding. With the power of working together, both sides got what they wanted.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            As if the 75%+ Neoliberal and further right wing Dems who still go to AIPAC events, including Schumer, didn’t want funding for the genocide too 🙄

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are some legislators who agree with a Ukraine bill and some who agree with an Israel bill. However, some would like to pass only one or the other. So what one does is to create a combined bill and find some number of legislators who will support both. The actual bill, as I recall, isn’t just Ukraine aid and Israel aid, but also Taiwan aid and the TikTok divestment requirement and involved discussions spanning all of the House, Senate, and Biden personally, so there was probably a lot discussion.

          It’s not an uncommon practice; part of getting legislation through is figuring out what needs to go in to get enough legislators onboard. “I’ll support X if you support Y.”

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would suspect an Israeli bill would have passed either way. Both parties support Israel. The only way to get Ukraine passed was by tying it to Israel. The border bill didn’t solve any issues. IT was garbage. It is why people have been pushing back on the bill.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone told me that all of these were voted on separately though, was that a lie?

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      They need it for the same reason musk needs that 56 billion from Tesla