Mubelotix@jlai.lu to Memes@lemmy.ml · 8 months agoLinkedinjlai.luimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1653arrow-down120
arrow-up1633arrow-down1imageLinkedinjlai.luMubelotix@jlai.lu to Memes@lemmy.ml · 8 months agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squareSam_Bass@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoWouldnt that be the same as using a multicore modeller computer, since AI is just semi randomizing code?
minus-squarehumbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoIt wouldn’t be the same if he multiplied by ψ+ signifying that we are moving towards quantum future
minus-squareqjkxbmwvz@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoI can suggest an equation that has the potential to impact the future: H|ψ> = E|ψ> + AI Here, I have chosen the time-independent Schrödinger equation, to symbolize the fact that AI is the most important innovation of all time. … This is all bullshit of course. Everyone knows that the AI term should be included in the Hamiltonian anyway 🙄
minus-squarehumbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoThis doesn’t look right since you’ve written the equation for very slow movement (sub-relativistic) and including the AI term should increase all the velocities in your ensemble exponentially.
Wouldnt that be the same as using a multicore modeller computer, since AI is just semi randomizing code?
It wouldn’t be the same if he multiplied by ψ+ signifying that we are moving towards quantum future
I can suggest an equation that has the potential to impact the future:
H|ψ> = E|ψ> + AI
Here, I have chosen the time-independent Schrödinger equation, to symbolize the fact that AI is the most important innovation of all time.
…
This is all bullshit of course. Everyone knows that the AI term should be included in the Hamiltonian anyway 🙄
This doesn’t look right since you’ve written the equation for very slow movement (sub-relativistic) and including the AI term should increase all the velocities in your ensemble exponentially.