United States Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has told a gathering of top security officials he doesn’t see war with China as imminent, nor unavoidable, despite rapidly escalating tensions in the Asia-Pacific region.
As an example of how powerful it is to have a narrative edge in war. where a government can easily get away with a crime against humanity, without any consequences.
Maybe if you were clearer about what you were saying, these “interpretations” wouldn’t be an issue.
I’m not sure what the point of bringing up Hiroshima and Nagasaki to show that the U.S. is capable of crimes against humanity is when you aren’t saying that’s what the U.S. is going to do again.
I didn’t. you stated the names according to your understanding.
I only stated the facts that have happened in the history, I don’t make statements of my assumptions about what could or would happen.
I stated the names because this is about the U.S. and China.
So you’re not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China, you’re not even talking about the U.S. and China. You’re talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic in this thread and you’re antagonizing a moderator about it to boot. Did I get that right?
let me be more clear for you, I’m not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China. If you follow my comments. you may notice, you’re imagining stuff in that regard. specifically, trying to corner me because your opinions differ based on your interpretation of my comment. this is my last time saying this again. CHILL OUT!
Okay, then why talk about Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
As an example of how powerful it is to have a narrative edge in war. where a government can easily get away with a crime against humanity, without any consequences.
Okay, so the U.S. is going to commit a crime against humanity in a war with China? What crime would this be?
that is your interpretation. You really have a crazy imagination dude. Chill out!
Maybe if you were clearer about what you were saying, these “interpretations” wouldn’t be an issue.
I’m not sure what the point of bringing up Hiroshima and Nagasaki to show that the U.S. is capable of crimes against humanity is when you aren’t saying that’s what the U.S. is going to do again.
I didn’t. you stated the names according to your understanding. I only stated the facts that have happened in the history, I don’t make statements of my assumptions about what could or would happen.
I stated the names because this is about the U.S. and China.
So you’re not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China, you’re not even talking about the U.S. and China. You’re talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic in this thread and you’re antagonizing a moderator about it to boot. Did I get that right?
let me be more clear for you, I’m not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China. If you follow my comments. you may notice, you’re imagining stuff in that regard. specifically, trying to corner me because your opinions differ based on your interpretation of my comment. this is my last time saying this again. CHILL OUT!
Once again, please explain how your posts are on-topic for this thread if they are not about the U.S. or China.
I guess I hurt someone’s EGO. 😬
That would be a violation of our civility rule. I would suggest you do not do so again.
Now, please explain how your posts are on-topic for this thread if they are not about the U.S. or China.