• Wooly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just a dumbass on the internet and I could’ve told you that. There’s already been an attempted mutiny for fuck sake.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Coup is the word you want. Attempted coup. The wagner group are mercenaries so they can’t really mutiny.

      • coffeetest@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am not sure coup is the right word either because it didn’t seem to me they had a plan on overthrowing Putin. While RF may have had trouble stopping Wagner’s advance, what could Wagner actually do if they made it to Moscow?

        While they may be mercenaries they are paid and directed by RF, so I think mutiny is probably more accurate even if not technically correct.

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Coup is the right word. They might not have wanted to depose Putin himself, but sure as hell seemed to want to take over the government. Putin would then have been a ceremonial figurehead, one accident away from being out of the picture completely.

          The entire play looked like an “evil chancellors” gambit. The king is painted as good and pure (because they’re popular) but the advisors are the ones who are pained as being at fault, so the usurpers come in to replace the advisors, and then speak for the king as well.

          The coup seemed to fail for two reasons,

          A, the Wagner group expected some support from the regular military that never materialized, because they’re fucking mercenaries and no one in uniform actually likes mercs.

          B, Putin had people threaten the families of the Wagner leaders.