Socrates bemoaned those young’ns who had the audacity to read their Homer, instead of memorizing it.

Children and Radio

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, there is sufficient evidence to recommend children and teenagers having limited internet and social media access during their formative years at this point.

    The tiktok algorithm of mindless doomscrolling funny little bits all short and digestible for a decaying attention span is just the most egregious example why restrictions should at least be considered.

    • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Apparently there was enough evidence to recommend children and teenagers to have limited access to the radio as well.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        You realize that’s still true, right? You’re posting this as some big own as though it’s somehow not harmful to mindlessly consume any form of media to an extreme extent, especially in the learning years.

        Somebody been watching too many tik toks?

        • Bipta@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Somebody been watching too many tik toks

          What a ridiculous logical leap.

        • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it isn’t true. I’ve never used TikTok, Instagram, and avoid YouTube shorts. I saw some articles about “TikTok Brain” making their way across the internet yesterday and I wanted to call out the hypocrisy.

          • some_guy@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “I’m not saying it’s true I just wanted to imply it’s true to drive enragement engagement”

          • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How is it hypocrisy if the previous forms of media were also bad for you, Tik-Tok is just more efficient at funneling meaningless drivel down your throat?

            • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think its hypocritical for a generation to consider the baseline media technology at the time of their upbringing to be generally acceptable, only to turn around and declare the next media technology to be unacceptable for their children.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Fwiw I actively believe that reddit is responsible for shortening my attention span.

                It is not hypocritical to call out tik tok for doing the same.

                • quadropiss@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  What situations your short attention span makes uncomfortable for you apart from things related to some sort of achievement (as perceived by your workplace, school, family, friends, etc)

              • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It may be hypocritical, but have you considered that all of these forms of entertainment are unhealthy? The only difference is that they get more and more efficient with each generation, causing increasing levels of concern from each generation. That’s indicative of a rising trend

                • Bipta@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is a rather interesting viewpoint and I can’t really find any fault with it.

              • Bipta@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think that’s generally a good argument, however the rate and level of dopamine hits from TikTok and YouTube Shorts may far surpass that of prior mediums and so actually warrant additional considerations and precautions.

                But then, I may just be an old man.

                • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Thanks! I agree with you, I just think that each technological leap up to this point has caused the level of dopamine hits to greatly surpass the prior medium (hence the viral adoption). But young brains seem to accept the new baseline and then the cycle repeats.

                  When I was growing up I was bombarded with articles from older people telling me how bad video games were for my attention span, how they would increase my proclivity for violence, etc. This did not prevent me from enjoying them immensely, making friends because of them, and eventually leading me to a fun career in computer science.

                  I suspect that will be the case with each new medium.

                • quadropiss@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Do you know anything about the reward system and addiction apart from the words “serotonin” and “dopamine”? /gen

            • quadropiss@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Such generalizing statements are blatantly untrue, hypocritical, and harmful. People don’t use social media without a reason. Everything a human does is meet their needs, both psychological and physiological. When humans resort to social media it means they resort to social interaction and whatever other needs they may have like having feelings validated, visual/audio/etc. stimulation, but that doesn’t sound sensational enough, that’s not enough to scapegoat a group of people

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok but research indicates that it fails to actually meet their long-term needs. This is actually a really confusing take, if humans always do what meets their needs then we wouldn’t have any issues at all? We TRY to do what we think will meet them, but we’re often mistaken, and this is an example of that.

                • quadropiss@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Did I say that it does meet needs long term? What was the sample? What was the methodology? What communities were they participating in? How were they participating? What were the needs? Did they have a neurodivergency? What were their surroundings like? What was their childhood like? Do they go to therapy? What therapeutic practice did they do in therapy?

                • quadropiss@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Also no. Addiction happens exactly when the needs are met more than usual, hence “social media addiction”, and it’s not the social media’s fault, it’s not “TikTok Instagram bad”. It’s weaponized misconceptions about mental health that are creating this issue in the first place

                  Edit: PSA - more than usual does not mean enough

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could say that about a lot of things, though. Video games and TV were commonly criticized this way. And it was a popular meme on Reddit that people would be so addicted to the site that they’d spend hours scrolling it.

      Criticizing tik tok is just popular on sites like this because people here really don’t like tik tok.

      At any rate, parents can already try to restrict their children’s access. But governments are gonna have a hard time doing so without hurting everyone as a whole (eg, see the attempts of some US states to require giving your ID to porn sites). Dunno if you remember being a kid, but I found my way around every restriction my parents set and I just disliked them for it.

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re all mediums. The content on them can be anything from mindless to informative.It’s all up to who’s curating it. Do you leave it up to the algos and advertisers or actually provide something to your kids? Up to a certain age letting them do whatever on the internet is idiotic like letting them run around a bookshop that carries porn and mein Kampf.

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tiktok is digitial media, the attention span is the issue, not the media format.

    I know a few people who admitted to me without me even probing them that they cannot handle watching or listening to a video over 1 minute long.

    I am not for censoring Tiktok, however I will never used it since its horrible on privacy and has “back doors” to a powerful and malicious government. And I like videos that are long with good discussion or information.

    • zovits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, tiktok is not digital media. It’s a chinese cyber warfare weapon of mass destruction.

      • Cam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think your right about that. It can be used to divide and subvert the west, but American big tech platforms do the same domestically and abroad.

  • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Social media in general and TikTok specifically have had major impacts to both our attention span as well as things like anxiety disorders.

    Everything else in this list from reading to videogames is a different way to absorb a story, but social media isn’t built for that. Its designed on FOMO, and the idea that you have to keep posting and engaging or you’ll disappear. The algorithms are also toxic and designed like a gambling addiction. Books don’t do that, even TV can’t really do that. Videogames can, but not all are. Social media absolutely is, though. Everytime.

  • nowan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Worth pointing out here is that many of these criticisms all along have been totally on-target. The printing press brought on wars of religion and a multitude of poorly-thought out, often racist/hate-filled screeds along with advances in learning and science. Radio has brought us Father Coughlin and Limbaugh along with democratizing politics the way printed pamphlets couldn’t. I’m sure I don’t have to point out that both TV and the internet have their brain-rotting sides as well.

    The fact that something won doesn’t mean it’s better. The fact that it’s better doesn’t mean it doesn’t have serious flaws.

  • Archmage Azor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TikTok, Social media, video games, rock and metal music, rap music, Dungeons and Dragons, Rock ‘n’ Roll, movies, phones, bikes, novels, older generations will always chose a scapegoat to focus on

    Eventually it will be our turn

      • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know. It’s probably apocryphal, but I just stole what he had said in the title.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      and now they’re able to memorize all the dances/emotes from a specific influencer/streamer. Almost the same, no?

    • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Counter counterpoint: my generation had enough memory capacity to be able memorize the works of Homer Simpson and to quote him regularly. Children adapt to whatever is relevant at the time of their upbringing.

  • Anon819450514@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Youtube shorts, TikTok, Facebook Story, Snapchat Reel: they are all the same. If you block TikTok, then you need to block others as well.

    Legal wise, it’s very hard to target a very specific type of media consumed. How can you really restrict that? IMHO, the only thing that might have better effects is educating people.

    Same for drugs, alcool and tobacco. They are a all addictives at different levels, and they have different consequences as well that neeeds to be taken account.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like the actual danger is too much of a single kind of stimulation. So if you ONLY sit around and read books, literally never go outside, never take a walk, never go out with friends, stop working… Is your contention that people were wrong to warn against doing that?

    Now, have you seen how some people consume TikTok? They will literally do almost precisely what I’ve described above. Just sit and stare and scroll for hours. Neglect other life activities.

    If you scroll TT for an hour per day, you’re never going to experience negative effects from it. If you scroll it for 14 hours a day, you will probably become a vegetable. Find a happy medium (for me it’s 0 hours per day but everyone is different), eat, go outside sometimes, spend time with real life people, go to work or school, etc.