• comicallycluttered@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Good lord, that dress can barely keep her breasts contained.

      Edit: I should clarify that I meant this as an amusing observation (irony and all, with all their hollow talk of “modesty”) and not because I give a shit what people wear.

      Also, was funny watching her constantly pulling the top up to keep from having a wardrobe malfunction.

        • comicallycluttered@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Whoa.

          There was no shaming involved (at least not intentionally). People can wear whatever they want. I’m the last person to complain about people’s choice of clothing.

          It was an (amusing to me) observation, mostly because I found it ironic that she’s on the side that praises “modesty” and then doesn’t, as usual, practice what nonsense she preaches.

          Also, I thought it was really funny how many times she had to keep pulling the top up to keep everything in there.

          That’s all my comment was. A throwaway observation about something I thought was funny.

          Puritanical shaming? Man, sorry if it came across that way.

          Edit: Oh, was it the “good lord” bit? I just use that term for comic effect a lot of the time. I forget it’s something people say unironically with regard to their beliefs. I see now how that could have been misinterpreted.

          I’m used to the term just being random exclamation a lot like how “Jesus Christ” or “OMG” or whatever are used these days. Apologies.

          • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, it very much seemed like you were complaining about how revealing the outfit is without the context of the right being the “modesty” side. That makes much more sense. Most of the time you see someone complain about that kind of thing it is very much from the shaming side.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, we all know who she is. Maybe I am missing something, but I do not think there is anything in the constitution saying you cannot be thrown out of a private venue for being an ass. The only thing I know about is you cannot be detained while Congress is in session. She was thrown out not detained.

  • marco@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Ma’am, I’m gonna have to ask you to leave.”

    “Do you know who I am?”

    “Oh, it’s you?!? Get the fuck out of this theatre now, Bitch!”

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t wait until somehow this becomes a “woke” issue… “The woke mob threw me out because I love freedumb! That’s why the left needs to be exterminated! … politically exterminated… yeah… that’s what I meant… politically…” (wink wink Nazis)

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have the freedom to make everyone around me miserable! I should get to vape and be loud and annoying in a quiet setting!

      What do you mean they also have the freedom to see a show without someone vaping in their face?

  • Can-Utility@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rumors that her husband, Jason Boebert, exposed his penis when asked for identification are unfounded.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems to be a lot about this woman America getting a millennial trump ready?