• Faresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think your title is grammatically correct. «very» starts with a consonant and therefore should be «Does it not pierce thy very heart?».

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feels like we’re doing our best to make up for that now with pics and video from almost everyone on the planet hitting the interwebs.

    I pity the historian that has to try to dig through all of it.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t dig through it manually. They’ll have better bulk data processing than even the NSA has today.

    • ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends. In some ways you are correct but in other ways not so much. We like to think in the digital age once its up, its up forever. In theory yes but in some ways no since we have already seen in recent memory. Hell the popularity of lemmy and the fedeverse was kicked off because many of us left reddit, lead to many of us basically deleting/editing our prior comments. Someone can possibly have a snapshot of it but the chances of it are pretty small for some weird random obscure post on a forum. Our reliance on free services can easily lead to something disappearing as easily as it appeared. Hell we are seeing some youtube videos basically disappearing over fears of Ai scraping and it can happen abruptly.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not only that; websites get deleted, servers can fail, data can be corrupted, business toss out memory storage when going out business, etc.

        Nothing in the digital lasts.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny how some older media are so much better for longevity, like CDs.
        And the expected lifespan is still only 50-100 years.
        That’s a speck of sand it the human history.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Tape disk drives and tapes are actually some of the longest lasting, when stored properly. Tape isn’t great for active data needs, where you need to read/write the data regularly. Super slow for that. But it’s killer for writing once and then dropping it in storage.

          Anyway, same thing with tapes, the length of time they last is a fraction of history, on top of needing proprietary hardware to play them.

          For example, there was that recently unearthed pilot of a sketch comedy show from Monty Python’s Graham Chapman and Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy’s Douglas Adams. It’s not particularly great, but it was lost to time except for a copy that Chapman had recorded to tape when the show first aired.

          Problem was, that tape was so old when it was discovered, it pre-dated VHS and Betamax and was in a format that literally no players existed for anymore. This lead to a long effort to rebuild a player from scratch, which they eventually succeeded, and now it lives on YouTube for weird comedy nerd historians.

          Anyway, the point being is that the mediums are short-term storage, for all intents and purposes, and that pretty much goes for all types of media humans uses, going as far back as stone tablets and books. The ones that survived were lucky and most are lost to time due to destruction or environmental degradation. At least with stone tablets and paper all you needed was to understand the language it was written in. Now we’re going to need electricity and knowledge of historical data storage practices and technologies.

          So, we’re always losing history, and people who go out of their way to preserve history and put it in modern formats to attempt to keep the data from disappearing forever are doing a service to future human history. I would say, in this way, pirates who remove DRM from media are taking part in an act of historical preservation.

          • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I think as long as we can count on some level of society, we have a shot at longer term preservation. Like, computers will continue to get faster, and mediums will continue to get upgraded and transferred and so forth, and we’re kind of already at a point where nothing recorded today needs to be “lost” with some careful planning. There are obvious holes in this, but it’s increasingly less likely to be a problem that the storage medium is the issue (again, caveating that we’re not talking about rebuilding society after a catastrophe or something) and more a problem with what the dependency of reading the data to be saved is, whether it’s transferred on storage formats that maintain data integrity, etc.

            Like, we can do redundant backups and so forth, but what if the things we’re backing up are server dependent? Or even simpler shit like Flash games. I really hope that more people writing software especially think about how to keep it usable for a long time.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s making some assumptions about what society looks like in the future. I’m guessing it’s more likely they’ll be looking over the device you used to type that message wondering what the hell it was used for.

  • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sometimes, when hiking, I’ll see something incredible, and when I go to capture it in a photo, it just doesn’t come out the same.

    Those vistas are allllll for me

    • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Glowworm Caves yesterday, many sunsets, the impact of the view of rolling hills on your eyes vs recorded etc.

      • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. Partially. I find myself looking back at pics and experiencing something much different.

        Similarly, I can retrace a route again and see things I completely missed before. Memory is fun :)

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Want to feel sadder? Humanity has existed on Earth in its current form for about 200,000 years.

    We’ve only had civilization for about 10,000.

    That means humans spent about 180,000 years throwing rocks, sticks, and presumably feces at each other in the dirt before we entertained the idea of working together for mutual benefit. With all of our present senses and capacities at our disposal.

    Just incase anyone ever wonders why it’s so difficult for humanity to do what’s best for itself. We only do what’s in our best interests after we’ve fully exhausted all the bad options several times over.

    • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what the authorities want you to think. They don’t consider anything civilized unless it’s suffering under their rule.

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      that’s not really true. 10,000 years ago is about when we developed agriculture, stopped roaming as much, and started writing in some form that could survive the millennia, but we’ve been living and working together since long before we were ever recognizably human.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In addition, we keep pushing key invention dates back further and further as we discover more archaeological evidence. It’s quite possible we were doing human things long before we think we did.

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is another thing that seems really weird to me. The explosion of technological development in the last 300 years or so compared to the preceding several thousand is pretty wild.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pre-agrarian humans had more in common with beasts than with us. We were basically just another migratory animal subject to the migration patterns of our prey and seasonal growth. We have had the misfortune to see what feral humans who survived in isolation behave like.

        The larger scale cooperation required for agriculture is when we began to diminish behaving as such.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dina_Sanichar

        We are products of our environments.

        • Suspicious@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is the dumbest “im so smart and edgy” comment I’ve ever seen. what we call a feral human today haa zero relation to life in pre-agrarian societies, also the idea that people …going to places were food will be makes them mindless zombies is so ridiculous thatI don’t even know where to start

          20 minutes of looking into archeological sites will show you how complex and cooperative non-agrarian society’s were (I’m saying non here instead of pre because there are many instances of societies developing agriculture and then moving away from it due to various social/environmental factors)

          • Provoked Gamer@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah. People seem to forget that the people in our past are exactly the same as us. They had fun, loved each other, got upset, got happy, worked together. They just didn’t have the advancements we have. Just because they went where food was doesn’t make them any less human. What else were they gonna do? Starve? They needed to eat, and they didn’t know of any alternative reliable way of getting food besides hunting since they didn’t figure out farming yet.

      • asyncrosaurus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        . 10,000 years ago is about when we developed agriculture, stopped roaming as much, and started writing in some form that could survive the millennia

        This is bias towards a specific type of societal structure.

        Lots of peoples with rich, complex and fascinating cultures continued to live successful nomadic lives for centuries past the introduction of agriculture.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We never stopped throwing feces and I guarantee we were more close to each other in prehistory than we are now. We’ve been waging war for as long as we could record it.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I’m really hoping that the idea of quantum archeology turns out to be more science than bullshit.

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are so many crazy possibilities that will probably never happen, I love imagining what the world would be like if we could look through a time window - my daydream is normally about sending probes back to the point in space earth used to be and how fascinating the debates about where to look first would be, knowing it’s going to take years to get there and record it with everyone debating and getting anxious as to what it’ll see.

      Like imagine how much information you’d get from fifteen minutes 4k footage of a Roman senate debate, and how disappointing it’d be after all that anticipation if you get a day or was closed. Still a billion things to obsess over in the image but disappointing when you’re hoping to see ceaser speak

      Of course trying to catch sight of Jesus would be a huge project, I imagine it like those grifts where people go looking for the arc. What do they do if there’s no sign? What do they do if when they look nothing is anything like expected - would be so many people trying to find clues to what actually happened, at some point someone is going to find something really wild like they finally find someone from the Bible but it’s Jesus mate Judas laughing about how rich they’re getting pulling the reward money and rescue scam from the good the bad and the ugly…

      And the people scouring to get clips for their YouTube channel, histories biggest cringe moments, wildest parties in history, luckiest trick shots ever…

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I would find absolutely crazy is someone having no idea how this technology that we find ubiquitous, but the far future doesn’t have a clue about it, so someone gets out his Quantum Resurrection machine and brings back Grandpa to explain it

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not really sure what quantum archeology is, but another possibility is that, should we ever discover a way of circumventing the speed of light, you could fly millions of light-years away and set up a big-ass telescope to watch past earth. It’d only work if we discover a way of travelling ftl though, and it’s highly unlikely we’ll accomplish that in our lifetimes.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically it’s this idea that you can date online the universe itself to restore anything or anyone from the past

  • Bread@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The real problem we have now is that there is so much information, we cannot store it all. You can’t just throw things out either because you truly have no idea what seemingly worthless things we produce are going to be deemed of significant value later on.

    That old blurry photograph of your great aunt with a photo bomb of some random dude? It is the only photo of the zodiac killer. That random shitty video in portrait mode of you driving through your home town in Kansas is the only surviving footage of what used to exist there before the 2046 asteroid impact that wiped out the state.

    You just never know what truly matters until its gone.

    • xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Data hoarder identified.

      This thinking is why my mother’s house is full of useless crap that she thinks belongs in a museum.

      What museum? The broken camera-chipped pottery-photographs of children museum?

        • Bread@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I won’t argue that you were incorrect. I do have hoarder tendencies and I “manage” that by keeping it only digital. That being said, I think my point still stands because despite my more ridiculous examples this does still happen.

          Lost classic TV show episodes that were thought lost to time are found again because of hoarders. Historical data on towns are kept by the person who has never thrown out a newspaper. Hoarding is bad, but it does prove to be useful on rare occasions. The fine line is saving potential chunks of history vs a stack of pizza boxes because they may have a use one day as storage.

          You may take a hard no on the matter because of what you have dealt with what your mother is going through, but I argue there is some specific things worth saving.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of the blurry video that may or may not be the only footage of Nick Drake.

      It would be awesome to find that someone took a camera over to the studio and the reel has been laying in an attic for 50 years.

      He’s the only artist who I admire so deeply and I can’t connect with him at all outside of his art. With other artists that I admire, I can see their mannerisms and personality if I want to. His is lost to time except through his music and stories from family and friends.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, I’m not sure as much is truly lost as one might currently think.

    There’s a number of things that seem more like an issue of history as a field having challenges in undue influence of academic popularity contests and subspecialty isolation.

    For example, the face of the historical basis for Helen of Troy has likely been on modern magazine covers, we just haven’t broadly realized it because most modern historians throw out Herodotus wholesale so they’ve ignored the details in his version of the Helen narrative, which happens to connect the events to part of Egypt’s history that’s been similarly poorly evaluated by scholarship to date.

    Even the way Homer and the Trojan War narrative gets handled is pretty ass backwards, with scholars preferring to just hand wave it as mythological history rather than seeing it as having combined a history of the Mycenaean conquest of Anatolia in the LBA with a later sea peoples capture of Wilusa back from the Hittites in the EIA (it has rather impressive levels of detail around events tied to both these things).

    We see modern debates about whether the Exodus narrative occurred or not as described in the Bible but there’s very little investigation into the Greek and Egyptian accounts of the same which differ significantly from the Biblical version (notably about it being ethnocentric), even claiming the latter version was altered. Versions that might be quite relevant to recent archeological finds like the Aegean style pottery with local clay in Tel Dan or the imported bees from Anatolia in Tel Rehov.

    Give it time. A lot of big topics that are generally dismissed or thought to be lost today might not still seem that way within a generation or two.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s lots of sources from the losing side. Josephus was a Jewish writer who told of the Roman destruction of the temple. The history of the Eastern Front of WWII, as it was known to the West, was dominated by the writings of German soldiers for a long time.

      History is written by writers. For much of it, that means it comes to us from an educated upper class. That’s where the historical blind spots are.

      • JesusLikesYourButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I take issue with describing Josephus as a part of the ‘losing’ side. Josephus had defected and was working as an interpretor for Titus while Titus was conducting the seige on Jerusalem in 70 AD. He took on the Roman emperor’s family name, Flavius. He firmly sits on the ‘winning’ side, with the Romans.

        Plus later on Christian’s were the ones copying his books, not Jews, since he was viewed as a turncoat by his own people. So his books were preserved by the ‘winning’ side as well.

        Not saying he should be completely disregarded or written off as a historian, just that he wasn’t part of any ‘losing’ side of history.

    • JesusLikesYourButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think not having it recorded in any way is worse. At least if something is recorded you can examine and study and compare the accounts to get an inkling of what may have actually happened or see where the truth has been stretched.