Over 100 Israelis have died and more than 900 were injured after rockets were fired from Gaza by Hamas militants, Israeli officials said Saturday.

The Palestinian Health Ministry said 198 were killed in Gaza and at least 1,610 were injured Saturday in retaliatory attacks from Israel.

“We are at war. We will win,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday.

The Israeli Defense Forces earlier declared “a state of alert for war,” according to a statement issued by the IDF.

“Over the past hour, the Hamas terrorist organization launched massive barrages of rockets from Gaza into Israel, and its terrorist operatives have infiltrated into Israel in a number of different locations in the south,” the IDF said early Saturday.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    All the Hamaboos are showing their noble savage peddling asses right now

    The attack is coming from Gaza. The settlement shit is going on in the West Bank.

    This is retaliation for settlement behavior the same way WWII was retaliation for the Ruso-Japanese war.

    Stop acting like y’all care about any of us as anything but favorite minorities to shut up and die in your fetishized revolutionary armageddon.

    Fuckin’ Bougeyevik trash, I’ll bet a full 90% of y’all think chat script is just misplaced 7s 2s and 3s.

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I suspect the reason Hamas has power is their ability to point at the atrocities in the West Bank and stir up hatred.

      Likewise the reason the Zionist warhawks in Isreal have power is they can point out the actions by Hamas and stir up hatred.

      That’s a hideous feedback loop seen throughout history. It’d be great if it stopped.

      My understanding is the Zionists justification for their West Bank actions would make it fair for Native Americans and Mexicans to begin evicting people and bulldozing towns throughout the US… Which I do not support. I’m betting he US would bomb Mexico and raid Native Territories if they did.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes it is. If everyone shares this dream then it’s a reality. But people like Hamas prevent it from being a reality.

              Israel is unleashing holy hell on Gaza right now. Because paradox of tolerance states that while we tolerate many things, the evil intolerance of Hamas cannot be tolerated.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                What is civilized about turning another nation into an open air prison? What is civilized about collective punishment? What is civilized about imprisonment without trial? What is civilized about turning elderly people out of their family homes, so that foreigners with no real connection to the area may live there instead? What is civilized about ignoring these things? What is civilized about funding and excusing them? Civilization is a lie we congratulate ourselves with when we don’t want to look at the carnage we condone.

  • archonet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Conflict between Israel and Palestine, color me shocked. Next you’ll tell me China and Taiwan aren’t the best of friends.

  • Blue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    9 months ago

    If one day someone comes to your house, the one you were born, the same house where your father was born, and his father before him. And starts killing, raping, torturing, executing, bulldozing the houses were your cousins lives, they don’t let you go to your sacred places, they don’t let you even move from the concentration camps and the walls they have erected.

    What would you do? You fight, even if you lose you will fight, even if the world sees the injustice but simply doesn’t care, you will still fight, for them you are a terrorist, but for your people you are a freedom fighter, fighting against invaders.

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hamas are absolutely headbanging murderous zealots committing a lot of atrocities right now. But if you herd people up, deprive them of basic liberties, brutalize & kill a bunch of them, and steal their land at gunpoint and then you can hardly act all shocked that a bunch of them are radicalized and go on a rampage. Doesn’t matter if we’re talking what Israel has done to Palestinians or what the United States did to Native Americans. Maybe the lesson to learn here, is don’t do those things. But I expect that Israel will pound Gaza committing its own atrocities as payback and the same thing will happen again in another decade.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      If the “fighting” means doing the exact same crimes to other innocents that is not making you the good guys.

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Israel is doing a genocide. Palestinians fighting back are absolutely not doing the same crimes.

      • Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Believe it or not, but the world isn’t simply comprised of goodies and baddies. We don’t live in a Marvel movie.

        • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          His point is that if you want international support don’t go around murdering innocent people then parade their bodies around.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          He didn’t imply that Israel were the goodies. It’s more like both sides have people being baddies.

          Also, you have a lot of innocent on both sides. That’s why both sides get called out for being baddies as they are hurting innocents. There’s a good chance that Hamas even killed some folks who have never done anything but be sympathetic to the Palestinian plight.

          Terroristic is the right description, and can also be applied to some of Israel’s behavior towards Palestinians.

    • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Nah, man. If they cited all those things, or more importantly the complete stifling of Gazans’ ability to prosper or flourish today, that would be one thing. What did they cite instead? The desecration of the Al-Aqsa mosque. That is more important to them than the apartheid. Fuck Hamas. They’re accomplishing nothing more than the death of Palestinians and more suffering. And they just empowered the most right wing, unpopular government that Israel’s ever had, one that Israelis were divided against. Hamas and the Iranian regime need to be eradicated. They are hurting any chance at Palestinian freedom and equality and right to prosperity. And they’re just causing more and more every day normal Israeli/Jewish and Palestinian suffering. This Iranian regime supports the tyranny of the Syrian government over the Sunnis (and its use of chemical weapons against them), Russia’s terrorist attacks on civilians in Ukraine and the invasion of that country in general, the complete undermining of the Lebanese government by Hezbollah, and the complete overthrow of the Yemeni government by a similarly tyrannical group in Yemen. And it uses of rape and sexual violence and murder against men and women protesting the death of a woman caused by the morality police and the oppression of women by the regime.

      I think the only way to accomplish either a true one state democratic nation that honors Israel-Palestine as the home of Judaism or a two state solution, is boycott and divestment (because there is no way to peacefully protest and engage in civil obedience to achieve freedom and equality (they murdered a journalist and nothing came of it) and there’s no way to win militarily). It worked with the apartheid government in South Africa, and hopefully it will work with Israel.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As a side note, if you want to spot the Press that are at least trying to be neutral, you can see how they refere to the Hamas people that inflitrated Israel:

      • The neutral Press will call them something like “guerrilas” (same as, for example, they would refer to the FARC types in Colombia if they attacked a city), “militants” or “infiltrators”.
      • The biased Press will call them “terrorists”
      • Imotali@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They are terrorists. That’s literally what they are. The fact that attacked an evil fascist state’s city doesn’t change that.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m happy that everybody who kills people to terrify the rest into doing what they want are consistently called terrorists.

          So both Hamas and the Israeli state.

          As actual and clear acts of “killing people to terrify the rest do what they want”, like bombing of hospitals, murdering of journalists and killing children throwing stones at the armored bulldozers razing their homes, all commited by one side, have consistently never been described as “terrorism” (even though they match the definition), it’s a pretty good indication of the bias by a media outlet when they now describe the entirety of the military incursion from one side and all its participants as “terrorism” even though they refrained to call actual acts of “killing people to terrify the rest do what they want” from the other side as “acts of terror” and those who executed them as “terrorists”.

          The unbiased thing to do is to consistently describe all “attacks meant to incite terror for the purposed of making the rest do what you want” (such as Hamas’ terrorists murdering people at a dance party, and Iraeli Army terrorists bombing hospitals and executing journalists and children) as “terror attacks” and those who executed them as “terrorists”.

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m sorry to say, but this is how guerilla warfare goes. Sometimes civilians are casualties.

        Did those civilians do anything to deserve it? Usually no. In this case though, they did. Some were already there, and they were responsible for starting the civil war by accepting to split the country. Others weren’t there, but came after that - trampling on another country’s ashes and disregarding its original citizens.

        What are you going to do when civilians move into your home and declare it is theirs? Consider them civilians? Consider them innocents?

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Seriously, I can sympathize with the frustration up to the point where suddenly murdering civilians is ok when “the good guys” are doing it.

        Material conditions my ass, if it’s wrong for one it’s wrong for all.

        And before any Hamaboos show their asses,

        انا امريكاني فالاسطيني، جدي كن من بيتلحم،

        My kin are not your shield for endorsing the same acts you hold up to demonize those you hate you Bougeyevik hypocrites.

      • Blue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Additionally, you’re basically saying that Hamas is [justified in slaughtering hundreds of unarmed

        The fact the Israel state contribute to the creation of those monsters, you can’t expect the hate to just disappear.

        • mrpants@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not. History never is and it’d be worth understanding how we got to this place.

          • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            The Ottoman Land Code of 1858 is a good place to start. Essentially much of Palestine was misappropriated to Ottoman bureaucrats and the Ottoman state. The Jewish National Fund purchased portions of this land and leased it to Jewish settlers who kicked the Arabs out with the cooperation of their Ottoman landlords. Legal, but unjust, and I have to imagine most of the Jewish settlers were as ignorant as the Arabs were to the fact that their land had been sold out from under them.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      What would you do?

      I would not beat, rape, and murder innocent people. That seems like a low bar to clear, right? Attacking military targets and personnel might be morally justified, but certainly not what they did over the weekend.

      • steveman_ha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        How many of the “terrorists” (the Islamic ones, not the Judaic ones) were actually from the oppressed populations, though? There are a lottttttt of people in that region that hate the Israeli government…Not sure how many of the displaced peoples you’re telling “this isn’t the right way to avenge violent state oppression” are actually participating in the fighting.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          He didn’t tell any of the non participants any such thing… His statement obviously refers to those commiting the acts, not generalized to everyone.

          That perspective does not excuse Israel’s behavior or blame any victim of Israel’s injustice, it simply points out the attacks are terroristic (meaning targeting civilians). Terrorists often have sympathetic reasons, but go about it in a way that is wrong.

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      What if it was a tornado? Do you still fight it to your last standing men or do you accept the fact that you can’t win?

    • protovack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Why leave out the fact that the Jews also have an equally legitimate claim on the land, in addition to having been taken close to the brink of total extermination by circumstances completely beyond their control? A normal, compassionate individual would welcome these people in, make room for them, and live at peace under a stable society, tolerant of different points of view. However, that is not what the Jews encountered upon the creation of Israel. It was just a continuation of the campaign to exterminate them, from a different group. Are you going to argue that it’s bad for Germans to murder Jews, but it is okay for Muslims?

      • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Jewish people who were brought to Palestine in the 40s were not being exterminated by the Palestinians. The Jewish people illegally collected guns while they were there and forced the Palestinians out of their homes and their country.

        • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you go a little further back in history you’ll discover some pretty heavy historical claims to the land by the Jewish people. Just to be clear, I consider “historical claim” to be the most bullshit geopolitical argument in existence. I’m merely pointing out the fallacy in claiming Palestinians have claim, but Jews do not. Palestine wasn’t even a country until it was established when Israel was established. It was just a bunch of nomads moving between various borders.

          • steveman_ha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Just curious, if some fascists came to your house citing historical claims to your land, how much would you care about the validity of that claim? How about when they burn your house down, kill your family, and arrest you for objecting? I truly, deeply would not give a flying fuck who lived nearby my house 300 years ago.

          • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            How much further back is a “little further”? My grandmother was one of the people who fled in 1948. The place her grandparents also lived. You’re talking about what 300 years ago? 400? More? Forgive me if I care very little about a claim to a land that is older than Shakespeare.

            I don’t care about a “historical claim” I care about the people who were living in the land and were forcebly ousted in a time frame where the people who were originally ousted are still alive.

            Also they were not “nomads” you fuckin racist. My great grandparents had land, a home, a community that were all taken from them.

            • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You’re making an arbitrary claim as though it’s objective. Why is displacement in 1948 justification for historical claim, but expulsion in 1917 not? Beginning 1914 during WW1, many Jews were expelled from Palestine by the Ottoman authorities as enemy nationals, since they had immigrated from countries now at war with the Ottoman Empire. In 1917, the Ottoman authorities carried out the Tel Aviv and Jaffa deportation, expelling the entire Jewish civilian populations of Tel Aviv and Jaffa. Many deportees subsequently died from hunger and disease. Surely those Jews have just as much claim to live in Israel as the Palestinians displaced by the 1947 UN partition plan.

              • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                The 1914 deportations were of Russian Jewish people. If any Russians claim they have rights to the land then sure, I’ll buy that, but I don’t care for one’s religion and I don’t believe the Jewish people who were brought to Palestine in the 40s were of Russian descent.

                Only 1/3 of the population that was deported in 1917 were Jewish. The rest were Muslims and Christians and had nothing to do with religion. Under British rule all the people deported in 1917 were allowed to return. So they got their claim when they were allowed to return, it really is unfortunate how many died due to the conditions they were sent into, and I’m not defending the actions of any State.

                Russians being deported and people who were allowed to return makes those claims barely anything compared to the Palestinians who were ousted multiple times in the last 100 years and not allowed to return, with the ones remaining living in apartheid.

                • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The 1914 deportations were of Russian Jewish people.

                  This sounds like you’re defending ethnic deportation. It doesn’t matter which passport the Jews held. They were expelled.

                  Only 1/3 of the population that was deported in 1917 were Jewish.

                  I am clearly and specifically talking about the Jews, not the Muslims or Christians.

                  Under British rule all the people deported in 1917 were allowed to return.

                  But they were not given their land and houses back. They were displaced, just like some Palestinians in 1948.

                  I’m struggling to believe you could argue the ways the Jews were treated is better. If anything, it was much worse. The Palestinians have never been wholesale deported, only displaced within the same nation.

      • Blue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Israel state was created thanks to the influence of wealthy Jews.

        A normal, compassionate individual would welcome these people in, make room for them, and live at peace under a stable society, tolerant of different points of view

        Until your guest started asking for more land, more control, and ultimately doesn’t want yo share with you but wants the things you have.

  • DigitalFrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, now we know where at least some the weapons the idiot US government left in Afghanistan ended up. I wonder if the 6 billion dollar bribe they paid to Iran helped out.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Israel has the iron dome to prevent something like this from happening, right? So why does the attack work this time?

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Saturation attacks are a common tactic to overwhelm air defense zones, but this isn’t just that. Hamas and IJ fighters have begun ethnically cleansing border towns, literally gunning down shelters full of civilians, as well as parading the naked bodies of women they’ve raped and murdered, through the streets.

      This is only a fraction of the attacks, and all on video btw, but I don’t suggest watching them.

    • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s not perfect and especially a huge amount of rockets can overwhelm it. Also it’s much more effective on slower homemade rockets, not the faster kind Iran typically sells Hamas.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      OP’s headline isn’t great, the rockets were only one part of todays events

      At 6:29am, the Gaza Strip terrorist group launched an incursion into Israeli territory by land, sea and air as well as some 3,000 rockets within hours… …Armed Palestinians managed to overwhelm several Israeli communities and military bases along the border, which have stayed under their control for hours. Dozens of Israeli civilians were believed to be held captive in Kibbutz Be’eri. Israeli forces poured into the conflict zones and engaged the terrorists. Dozens of Israeli captives - including numerous women, children and elders - are believed to have been taken into the Gaza Strip.

      source

      ETA: there’s the added factor that it’s Saturday and a religious holiday so more people would have been asleep at home at that time, or on their way to pray/celebrate/party.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    No good guys here. Hamas doesn’t seem to serve the Palestinians, they serve their own Jihadist agenda. Isreal remains a fascist apartheid regime which has been systematically killing all Palestinians in a genocide for decades.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

      “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

      To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

      The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

      Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

      This isn’t good-faith criticism.

      These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

      • Imotali@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Hey so I know we’ve been doing a genocide but look, we’re being really nice when we bomb innocent civilians homes by letting them know we’re going to bomb their homes.”

        This (a) doesn’t excuse literal genocide and (b) is just a “nicer” version of exactly the thing they’re appalled Hamas just did. You don’t get to cry foul if you’re going to retaliate with a tit for tat play.

        • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Gaza is a massive prison and they don’t have anything to loose anymore. Will Israel become the exterminator? We will see.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        9 months ago

        Murder of civilians celebrated by the whole of their society is not justified by reaction. I suggest you look at some other societies which react to genocidal crimes, for some reference. Most of them don’t do that.

        Nah, this was the case with Palestinian Arabs all along. Since their “throw all Jews into the sea” till now.

        • V H@lemmy.stad.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          ANC bombed civilians and their attacks were celebrated by many. The IRA did, and were celebrated by many. ETA did, and were celebrated by many. It is common, and suggesting it’s unique to Palestinians is pure racism.

          EDIT: Ah, looked at one of your other comments that were equally awful. Block incoming.

          • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t think you know the difference between collateral damage and massacre. Or maybe you know that, just pretend to be a moron. I can accept your pretense, but not your point.

            • drstrange@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Are you suggesting it is not true that the groups he mentioned intentionally targeted civilians?

              Perhaps you’re not old enough to remember the ANC bombing campaign against Wimpy restaurants, mainly timed to go off during lunchtime to maximise damage.

              The Church Street bombing it’s reasonable to argue collateral damage for, but a burger chain doesn’t strike me as a legitimate military or government target you can play the “collateral damage” game with.

              Maybe it was just ignorance of history that made you single out Palestinians.

              • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                OK. I don’t think IRA and ANC had that nasty habit of raping their victims and parading their mutilated bodies, or lynching them, and in general these were not genocidal in ideology while Hamas is. Is that sufficiently clear for you to comprehend?

                FFS, I’m Armenian and I could give Israel another try at existing after turning it into radioactive ash, but defending these animals is just vile.

                • drstrange@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  And now you’re making an entirely different point and evading addressing the gross generalization you made where you blamed not just Hamas but all Palestinians for the crimes of some and implied they were uniquely bad. At this point I agree with the other person who blocked you.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hamas gave being legitimate a try. Israel blocked their accession in the West Bank after they won the election. They were never given a chance to serve Palestinians.

      • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wouldn’t really expect them to idly stand by and let an organization whose charter is essentially “Death to Israel, death to all Jews” to come into power

        There cannot be a peaceful coexistence between Israel and Hamas because (and their charter has a section explicitly devoted to this) Hamas does not want it, when they talk of “ending the occupation”, they don’t just mean of Palestine

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Funny thing. If we used that logic then we’d all be dead. No war would ever end but with the complete annihilation of the loser and with nukes that means everyone.

          Furthermore, PR line or not, Hamas was elected. Interfering to stop them from taking power is an act of war itself. Justify it how you want but Israel hasn’t given peace a chance in a long time.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            When one side very explicitly states “there will be no peace, we will keep fighting until one of us is completely wiped out”, I struggle to see why the world should not oblige, and while the state of Israel is definitely not perfect it’s not very difficult for me lean towards the side that’s still managing to perform roof knocking over the complete and utter barbarism displayed by the Hamas terrorists over the fast few days

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    POTUS Biden already gave a response on supporting their military ally, Israel, and if I see one more braindead fucking comment like “sUrE BUt WhERe wAs HAwAiI’s FaST ReSPoNsE?” Within 4 hours he sent aid an national guard response, idk how right wingers keep using that stupid fucking talking point.

    That said I really don’t appreciate the onesidedness of the USA response, I have much higher hopes for the UN council assigned to this issue and any UN Task Forces deployed in the future. I believe Israel mostly caused this issue on their own by the apartheid oppression of Palestinians, I think this outcome and many other attrocities would have been completely avoided in the timeline where Rabin wasn’t assassinated

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have much higher hopes for the UN council assigned to this issue and any UN Task Forces deployed in the future.

      LOL! You really don’t understand anything about how the world works, do you?

      I believe Israel mostly caused this issue on their own by the apartheid oppression of Palestinians, I think this outcome and many other attrocities would have been completely avoided in the timeline where Rabin wasn’t assassinated

      Conveniently skipping over Ariel Sharon there aren’t you? You know that time when Israel removed all settlements and ended the occupation of part of Palestine as a goodwill gesture? What happened after that? Something for you to look into.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        LOL! You really don’t understand anything about how the world works, do you?

        UNSCO and UNDOF both have headquarters in Jerusalem and consistently have teams both in offices and on the ground upholding ceasefires and patrolling the borders. They’ve easily done more good with fewer resources than all singular nations combined on this topic.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes the UN can help in being observers after a ceasefire is agreed upon.

          Does it look like there’s an imminent ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas?

          Do you think there’s are UN citizens that sign up for the UN military and go through training to serve on UN missions? Not how it is.

          The way it really works is the UN asks actual countries to provide soldiers for these missions. So which countries do you think are going to send their soldiers to fucking Gaza based on a promise by Hamas not to attack them?

          And UN observers don’t fight wars. They just report to both parties of the ceasefire the activities of the other. If either side takes military action the observers leave. Hamas fires rockets at Israel every week. Just that the Iron Dome takes them out and you don’t hear about it. But if you’re the leader of a country are you going to send your soldiers somewhere there will constantly be rockets flying over them with the potential that if the Iron Dome might clip on and divert it into your soldiers?

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If my memory isn’t failing: then Israel will bomb some apartments, raid and beat some holy sites, eventually call a ceasefire before all the civilians die from lack of food, water, and power, then build more checkpoints and fenced off areas, and finally we’ll be right back here again in a few years until there are no more Palestinians.

            So to answer your question, yes. If it weren’t for the UN I really truly believe Israel would just commit genocide.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              You’ve obviously consumed a lot of internet propaganda originating from Iran.

              Israel’s intent were actually genocide they could simply drop a nuke on Gaza and there would be nothing the UN could do to stop it. They don’t do that because their intent isn’t on genocide.

              Also the UN cannot be in Israel without the consent of Israel. Nations have ultimate sovereignty over their territory there is nothing about the UN that supersedes national sovereignty. Seems you’ve also fallen prey to the “black helicopter” UN conspiracy theories, just you think UN black helicopters are a good thing. The reality is they don’t exist, UN peacekeepers are only where they are because nations have agreed to their presence to observe the other party of a treaty (and will allow themselves to be likewise observed) to ensure they are complying.

              You should take some time to learn about how things work in the world instead of just believing everything you read on social media. The can provide tools that nations can use to facilitate peace, but the nations themselves decide whether to use those tools.

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Israel

                Literally sent

                Netanyahu

                To Court

                Over This

                What the hell kind of Iranian Propoganda originates in the courts of Israel?! He was literally removed from power because of the corruption trials.

                • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Israel sends Netanyahu to court over many things. He’s a really crooked dude. So you’re gonna have to narrow down which specific case you’re going on about.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    There was a joke on Rick and Morty that Rick got the Palestinians and the Israelis to sign the treaty of “peace plan that works if you think about it a bit”.

    I am sure every commenter has one of those plans in their back pocket that would work if implemented. The problem is there is no incentive. In Palestinine, Hamas grows stronger the more Palestinians hate Isreal, and their opposition grows stronger the more Palestinians want peace. Meanwhile Likud grows stronger the more Israelis hate Palestinians, and the opposition grows stronger when Israelis want peace. Why would either side implement something that would decrease their power?

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I find the timing of this suspicious, given there’s rumours the negotiations between the US and SA are in their final stages.

    If SA is about to throw Palestine under the bus, as is rumoured, that could explain the timing.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Iran trying to get the first move advantage in what they’d deam the inevitable opening of yet another proxy war with KSA

  • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    as usual, the Palestinian death toll is now at least 5 times higher than the Israeli death toll and Israel isn’t done yet

    Don’t lose sight of who the aggressor is.

    • Kalash@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s a poorly equipped terrorist group fighting against a full fleged national military force. If the current death toll is only 5 times higher for Hamas, they really chaught Isreal off guard with that attack.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is a chart that shows one thing only: Israel has the stronger military.

      It doesn’t say a thing about who attempted to kill more civilians, and who took steps to avoid civilian deaths. It doesn’t say anything about who has made concessions for peace, and who has walked away from peace deals for almost a century.

      The chart shows military might. It doesn’t show intent. It doesn’t show who tried to avoid bloodshed. It doesn’t show who ignited conflict after conflict.

      A similar chart showing civilian deaths in WWII would show the US killed way more Nazi civilians than vice versa. Would you be arguing that the US was the bad guy in that war?

      This is only true because Israel is good at stopping attacks, not because Hamas isn’t trying.

      Graph “intentional attacks” targeted at civilians and you’ll get a very different picture. Personally, if someone tried to murder my family but failed, I wouldn’t find them blameless just because they didn’t succeed.

      Also missing from the picture is that for decades Hamas has been using Palestinian civilians as human shields, building bombs and rockets in the houses where children live, shooting rockets from inside schools and hospitals.

      Hamas gave Israel the choice of letting it’s own children die, and not shooting back, or shooting back and Knowing that no matter how hard they tried (and they try pretty fucking hard) that they wouldn’t be able to avoid civilian deaths.

      And ALL of this was because Hamas was banking on people in the west doing exactly what this gullible sap is doing: assuming that Israel is the monster.

      Let’s see a chart of the number of attempted murders of civilians from each side. That’ll paint a pretty different picture.

      Tell me, because we both know that the Israeli casualty number is only low because Israel is good at protecting its citizens and not because Hamas isn’t trying to kill as many Israelis as it can, do you really think the situation would be better if Hamas was more successful at killing Israelis?

      And to the exact same point, one side being less successful at killing citizens doesn’t make them right either.

  • arymandias@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah poor Hamas, he had no choice but to murder civilians

      Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

      “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

      To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

      The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

      Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

      This isn’t good-faith criticism.

      These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

    • dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a violent revolution to extinction. All the more political capital for the Netanyahu government to rapidly encroach.