Hello folks

I don’t think I’m the only one here who thinks the fediverse is a great technology that connects people all over the world via a robust decentralised network. This network encompasses the widest range of interest groups and the most diverse ways of interacting with each other. Whether forum, video or image platform, whether books or music network, everything is part of one big whole.

Despite this diversity of possibilities, I personally still miss some services that I would like to share with you.

  1. dating apps - A decentralised, open source dating platform on which you can join instances according to interest groups or sexual preferences.
  2. git hosting - A platform where you can host your git repos and collaborate on software projects across instances. (Forgejo is already working on it)
  3. networking and personal profilation platform - A LinkedIn-like platform with instances by industry, interest or region where you can network, present yourself or exchange know-how.
  4. crowdfunding and membership platform - A mixture of Patreon and Kickstarter where you can share your own content according to different support levels and crowdfund projects.
  5. event, group organisation and community participation - A platform on which you can join groups like on Meetup and organise meetings but also internal group interactions like on slack or launch and support civic initiatives like on Decidim.

What do you think of this? What services do you still miss on the Fediverse?

    • iso@lemy.lolEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      Yep, I hate LinkedIn for their stupid ads and “premium” features.

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        Those are bothersome, plus it’s less about collaborating and networking more and far more a channel for sales people to find you and try to sell you stuff. “Hey, let’s connect and be friends, wanna see my SaaS?”

    • neutron@thelemmy.clubEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if such a platform will gain acceptance beyond “nerdy techies” like us. There could be a working platform with apps and all, but if the suits find it “not professional enough”…

  • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
    13·
    1 year ago

    The only one here I think might not be appropriate (at least in the way that other fediverse platforms are structured) is dating apps. There’s a much greater need for moderation, privacy, and safety when it comes to dating apps.

    We do need something different, especially because all the big dating apps are controlled by a single company (and the rest form the rest of the oligopoly), but the Fediverse may not be the right way to do it. Open Source but centralized might be the way to go

    • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      I am convinced that decentralisation and publicity and secure private chats are not mutually exclusive if you use the appropriate protocols: On the one hand you can have ActivityPub, which is suitable for communication and discoverability between the instances, and on the other hand you could use a secure messaging protocol such as matrix, which could then be used for private chats.

      For your information: We already have a centralized, open source dating app. It’s called Alovoa.

      • wiki_me@lemmy.mlEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        For your information: We already have a centralized, open source dating app. It’s called Alovoa.

        The dev is also open to activitypub support

        Problems with problematic users can be solved by explicit whitelisting, or having credit card verification.

        • some_guy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Yes if there’s one thing I want out of a dating app, it’s being able to give my CC info over to any schlub who wants to spin up an instance

          • wiki_me@lemmy.mlEnglish
            11·
            1 year ago

            Does not have to be a random instance but a reputable one like mastodon social, and it can be optional, people give cc to random shops online and you could do a charge back or even use paypal and patreon (as long as they respect warrants), reportedly 1 in 6 women gets raped or experience an attempt at rape so making women safer is good.

        • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Dude what are you talking about? Have I ever mentioned that I want to convince anyone? Stop hallucinating things.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.meEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Especially the safety aspect. The big platforms have extensive moderation tools to keep the creepers out. And most dating apps are still widely unappealing to women because most men on them are creepy as fuck. That's also why you can't send pictures or even links on Tinder: guys just won't stop sending dick pics as if that's appealing.

      I can't imagine if you can basically make a fully anonymous profile on an instance like exploding-heads and hexbear how fucking awful the experience would be, especially for women and minorities. And who do you trust to moderate your personal conversations going toxic, especially if the report propagates to the original also toxic enabling instance?

      Or the sheer amount of spam, OnlyFans baits and escort services that would dominate such a platform.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      You’ve gotta remember, just because the norm is one way - there’s an audience out there for which this would be a safety improvement.

  • HamSwagwich@showeq.comEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of you are confusing Federation with decentralization. They are not the same thing.

    • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      Federation is a part of decentralization. Instead of one server you have multiple user run ones. It is not distribution though as there is no P2P component.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.eeEnglish
    10·
    1 year ago

    Decentralized dating apps is a good way to make women feel incredibly unsafe. Not only is the fedi a more techy nerd crowd, it also has massive moderation issues. It’s one bad thing to spam an instance with CP. It’s even worse when you can make a fake profile to stalk someone with zero accountability and potentially put them in physical danger, while also being unbannable. I’m sure a rapist/stalker/murderer would totally be stopped by defederating their instance, right? They’d just spam multiple accounts for their target.

    Moderation is extremely important here, and so is attracting a crowd which makes or breaks it, which the fedi is 100% not going to ever do. How would the fedi and developers respond if there was even a single rape/murder as a result of their platform and weak moderation? The whole thing would probably collapse.

    Meet up groups are similar but not as targeted. That wouldn’t be a bad idea though, since I guess someone leaving up a poster in town or something is kind of a form of that.

    • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      42·
      1 year ago

      These are all valid points which I partially forgot about and I’d love to write a follow up post reagrding this exact issue.

      I think that most of your concerns are addressable on a technical level. Others will rely on the instance’s community to guarantee an even safer experience. This will also benefit these instances as they can advertise with this trust level they recieve from the users.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.worldEnglish
        01·
        1 year ago

        I mean sure it can be solved easy enough: centralize it, and work with the authorities for reportable cases. Fork over the data. Exactly all the stuff most people in the fediverse wouldn’t want, but there are serious upsides to having a central authority for such stuff.

        More specifically, anything that requires legal intervention or arbitration might be better off being centralized. This is exactly why crypto isn’t really a valid model for money, our everyday usable of money needs a moderation and arbitration authority that is backed by actual legal enforcement. And dating apps need a way for people to report creepys and stalkers and in extreme cases, have the data be handed over to the police easily.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        There’s a secondary issue of the ability to delete data. The fediverse is, in a way, anti-privacy. All it takes is for one instance to defederate between when you post something and when you delete it for a copy of it to live on forever.

    • Zak@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      Not only is the fedi a more techy nerd crowd

      I don’t like the implication that a techy nerd crowd is more dangerous to women than men on average. If that’s what you mean to say, do you have evidence that it’s true?

      Something I do think the fediverse really needs is a reputation system. I’m not sure exactly how it would work, but I can think of some properties it should have:

      • Choice at several levels (user, server, community where that’s a feature) about who to trust as sources of reputation information and what privileges require kind of reputation
      • Positive reputation information should take time to build up
      • Negative reputation information should be specific about the behavior that caused it, and possibly preserve some form of evidence
      • People should be able to voluntarily tie multiple accounts together to combine their reputation
  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure 4 could ever be workable, unless the funding, buying and donations can be done on a legal currency that doesn’t track payer identity, operator identity or operator information. Like, you know, cash. Because I’m certainly not going to associate my random internet accounts with my IRL banking info. That would literally give banks the ability to censor the Fediverse.

    • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Does not have to be like that. Crypto can be used on the one hand and for creadit cards it would be an alternative to liberapay or ko-fi.

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        21·
        1 year ago

        crypto

        You mean those scam pseudo-coins where I can pay $10 today and it’s worth $0.00093 for the receptor of the payment when they want to use it to eat tomorrow? Sure! That’ll absolutely work!

          • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
            3·
            1 year ago

            Hey, I’d be happy to be proven wrong with a crypto that actually works and isn’t just an excuse to return to the coal economy. Since if it works, it’ll be able to do the thing I was asking about in the first place.

            • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
              2·
              1 year ago

              If that’s so I’d recommend looking into particl.io. they actually have a mission to provide a secure, decentralized and anonymous market and trade ecosystem.

  • ram@bookwormstory.socialEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    I want:

    • Federated anime lists software - BookWyrm could be repurposed for this
    • Torrent trackers - private trackers might be able to work by having each user have a ratio depending on their instance, tracker instances opting in to being viewable by other instances as a whole and/or users individually
    • Booru-style image boards
    • a Neopets clone

    For my final wish, I want a Tiktok clone. I don’t really know if this could work while maintaining any level of user privacy, as what makes Tiktok work so well is the sheer amount of personal user data they keep, from watch times to likes to reposts to shares to even knowing what videos you leave the platform on. I think a fediverse-style Tiktok clone would only be accepted if it only relied on likes and reposts for personal algorithms.

    Edit: Oh, and good federated wiki software.

    • Spzi@lemm.eeEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      Not sure how a (de)federated Wiki would look like.

      Partially defederated comment sections of Lemmy posts can be pretty confusing. Users coming from different instances can see entirely different comment / reply structures.

      I’m not sure if that would be a problem with a Wiki, but it’s certainly something to think through before starting.

      Another point: Why? Who gains what if a Wiki is federated? What problem does that solve?

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    What I think is also missing is Disqus alternative too comment on websites with Fediverse accounts. Wordpress has an ActivityPub plugin, but it would be great to have something like this on static sites or other CMS software too.

    • Alex@lemmy.mlEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      You can integrate Mastodon comments into your website with a little bit of JavaScript.

  • hperrin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    1 year ago

    Some of these are available as mailing lists. I know it’s not the same thing, but it’s close.

    I’m really excited for federated git hosting though. It would be cool to run my own instance and accept pull requests/issues from anyone on whatever instance.