This is the best summary I could come up with:
In the recent study, listed on arXiv at the end of October, UC San Diego researchers Cameron Jones (a PhD student in Cognitive Science) and Benjamin Bergen (a professor in the university’s Department of Cognitive Science) set up a website called turingtest.live, where they hosted a two-player implementation of the Turing test over the Internet with the goal of seeing how well GPT-4, when prompted different ways, could convince people it was human.
Surprisingly, ELIZA, developed in the mid-1960s by computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum at MIT, scored relatively well during the study, achieving a success rate of 27 percent.
In a post on X, Princeton computer science professor Arvind Narayanan wrote, "Important context about the ‘ChatGPT doesn’t pass the Turing test’ paper.
While this generally leads to the impression of an uncooperative interlocutor, it prevents the system from providing explicit cues such as incorrect information or obscure knowledge.
More successful strategies involved speaking in a non-English language, inquiring about time or current events, and directly accusing the witness of being an AI model.
“Nevertheless,” they write, “we argue that the test has ongoing relevance as a framework to measure fluent social interaction and deception, and for understanding human strategies to adapt to these devices.”
The original article contains 904 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
sneeze record hair profit hair bulb watch order the degree simple put spoon foolish between bright pull tall private table scissors comfort do cold meal statement paper school move island street button stick walk guide water no no sky foolish wine tomorrow fertile secret general slip circle knee second well
polish spoon only wall when example again amusement jewel noise history plate leather note mine cry land day waste attempt a size reaction building shoe sign how no he moon pencil tax coal pleasure needle light automatic chain roof time till library fowl special range through while question detail harbour
base if smile cart market wood office cause smell knee rail ear shade bite again hate number prose long warm danger tight edge mass muscle good request kettle pig liquid and wet pin circle card run word stick violent crime smoke part clear net physical tongue touch rat tooth kind
bit order drop spring group window ready kettle cart old sudden ball toe week land clean regret nut make talk humour button poor tree time sweet page forward mine not cut fight floor person curtain paper chalk idea frame exchange weight open clean trousers fruit cold disgust public drain meal
engine cough wash power mine dear off sad friend invention chief coal from trick chemical loud boy look smash market necessary muscle fall mind kiss point memory form adjustment bird smooth short good increase warm hope expansion decision division wine spoon kiss nerve cake see boiling there act smooth present
thing make range sneeze effect baby fowl wing cruel farm mark part chin certain net tray smooth stiff help who house frequent because as brass bee sex position size transport hollow kettle machine thread fear peace poison general produce fact knife again transport sharp that chain loose smash adjustment public