• Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of Democrat primary debate where right before (or after… was a while ago, dont remember which) TARP was released to pump hundreds of billions of dollars straight into CEO’s pockets because it was going to “trickle down” and fix the economy (the actual issue was the sub prime mortgage trade in wall street), Hilary was quoted as saying “I was the Senator for New York when all that went down, and I personally went to Wall Street and told them ‘Hey! Stop it!’” They, in fact, did not stop it.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This whole thing is a perfect example of how conspiracy theories get a foothold. We are seeing celebrity cancellations because of disagreement with Israel and people clearly asking for change from their leadership who refuse. Yet the apartheid state remains enabled and the genocide supported.

      It’s pure balls

      • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel of course boldly claims that 7k of those 18k dead are terrorists. Somehow in their minds the death of the 11k others doesn’t mean shit. No evidence beyond “trust me bro”.

        • Melkath@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, dont forget, they have been caught a few times now rounding up civilians, shaming/torturing them as terrorists, claiming they are terrorists, then it turns out they were just normal civilians rounded up like cattle.

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a tough time to be the Biden administration, they’re trying to support our allies and retain international credibility while dealing with significant numbers of angry voters who are trying to bind Israel’s hands before they can achieve meaningful military objectives to keep themselves safe. This will end when Hamas is deposed and the threat of future attacks is mitigated, which could happen immediately if they were so inclined:

    “There’s a gap between the intent and the results, and that’s the gap that we’re trying to make sure is closed,” Blinken said. “Look, this could be over tomorrow. This could be over tomorrow. If Hamas got out of the way of civilians instead of hiding behind them, if it put down its weapons, if it surrendered.”
    The “entire world” should put pressure on Hamas “to do just that,” Blinken said. “That would stop this tomorrow. But in the absence of that, Israel has to take steps not only to defend itself against the ongoing attacks from Hamas, but against Hamas’s stated intent to repeat Oct. 7 again and again if given the opportunity.”

    I totally agree with him. It’s sad when I see more people on the left angry at Israel for responding to being attacked than at Hamas for instigating, hiding among civilians, and prolonging the conflict, causing this terrible yet predictable situation.

    • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a tough time to be the Biden administration, they’re trying to support our allies and retain international credibility while dealing with significant numbers of angry voters who are trying to bind Israel’s hands before they can achieve meaningful military objectives to keep themselves safe.

      Your allies are child murderers.

    • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m honestly not sure we can truly say that Hamas ‘instigated’ this situation in good faith, as this is merely the most recent flare-up in a long history of atrocities that goes both ways. That doesn’t excuse what Hamas has done either, but I also wouldn’t consider shelling civilian buildings to be a particularly defensive action.

      People aren’t trying to ‘bind Israel’s hands before they can achieve meaningful military objectives’ they’re trying to bind Israel’s hands before they can commit more atrocities. These atrocities are being actively supported by US taxpayer dollars, and the sentiment among voters (at least the ones I know) is that US support means that we have blood on our hands by association. That’s not something I’m willing to support, and voters shouldn’t feel bad for not supporting it either.

      Nothing about this mass casualty event should be considered a foregone conclusion. All we can do is try and stop this cycle of violence from being perpetuated.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Causing, “the most recent flare-up,” is instigating as it regards to this specific conflict.

        I also wouldn’t consider shelling civilian buildings to be a particularly defensive action.

        IDF claims they level buildings used by Hamas, however there are anonymous accounts that say that can mean any connection no matter how slight will suffice; a Hamas member living in their family apartment might lead to the entire building being leveled. This might make it technically a legal military target, but there’s legitimate criticism to be made of such strategies. I suspect Israel is hitting Gaza hard while they still can to create a buffer zone and/or to discourage future attacks.

        People aren’t trying to ‘bind Israel’s hands before they can achieve meaningful military objectives’ they’re trying to bind Israel’s hands before they can commit more atrocities.

        This invasion and all the destruction will have all been for naught if they do not take out Hamas before they leave, or at very least change the situation in a way that denies intifada groups the ability to launch future attacks. If they blow up infrastructure and leave them in charge, it’s a half-measure, and just a matter of time before the next attack. It would be Pyrrhic victory for Hamas.

        the sentiment among voters (at least the ones I know) is that US support means that we have blood on our hands by association. That’s not something I’m willing to support, and voters shouldn’t feel bad for not supporting it either.

        Yes, sadly I believe the electorate just sees asymmetrical warfare and assumes the underdog is worth cheering for without understanding the context.

        • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          a Hamas member living in their family apartment might lead to the entire building being leveled.

          Oh I see, so you’re okay with the whole family dying. Now I understand what a sick fuck you are.

          Let’s sya your cousin works for the Hamas government… Because he has a governmental job, so they bomb the home you are sheltering and starving in and you, your niece, your mother, your father, your grandfather, and all your children die. Is this acceptable?

          I already know the answer: Yes. To you, it must be acceptable.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think it’s sad you see more people concerned by genocide over terrorism?

        • dwalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The current ratio for collateral “damage”, as you called it, is 2-1. Are they missing and shooting terrorists by mistake?

            • dwalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, thats to be expected. They are, in fact, terrorists. Whats not expected is the lack of regard for human life from the idf.

              If you think a state should have the same standards as a terrorist group, i dont know what to tell you

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you think they should send troops into a well prepared guerilla terrorist den without air support and incur heavy losses, encouraging increased use of human shields in the future, and making Israel less safe in order to save civilians from a belligerent nation who are likely to be hostile themselves, I don’t know what to tell you.

                Fundamentally Israel has to choose between the lives of it’s own soldiers and civilians in a hostile territory, their decision should be unsurprising.

                • dwalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Dude, they are bombing hospitals, ambulances, refugee camps, UN offices, UN schools, starving people, etc. I dont know what to tell you.

                  Lets hope you never find yourself in the same neighbourhood as a hostage taker or idf may as well bomb it.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you think they are okay with genocide, despite their history, but just not very good at it? 🙄

            They could have just fire bombed Gaza like Dresden, but instead they built a sophisticated AI to generate legal military targets, and until recently would warn people of strikes ahead of time so they could leave.