• newcockroach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fediverse isnt a competition and nor we we should try to replace gaint companies(even tho that it would be great) rather stay as a free alternative to those platforms.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Does anyone know a decently sized mastodon instance that’s defederated from Threads? I need to move from mastodon.world which wants to wait and see what Threads does. I moved to mastodon to get away from mainstream social media and I don’t want any of Threads content in my feed. So please suggest some instances!

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely not. The same reason back then as it is now. Namely: I don’t trust Meta to not try to destroy the fediverse

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are scared because they don’t know what will happen. It’s basically conservatism at play and “the others” getting into a platform. Reality is - nothing of substance will happen, other than more users being able to communicate.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care either way, but I hope they’d be welcome as long as they kept their instance cleaned of the kind of things other instances have been defederated for.

    If meta wants all the data there are plenty of other ways to get it, pretending the fediverse is an impenetrable shield is silly. And maybe more people will learn about the fediverse in this way.

  • dallo@lemmy.kiois.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    More awareness is always good to take. That’s said my own personal instance will defederate because damn meta

  • dbilitated@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    the whole point of federation is networks being able to connect to each other. it will hopefully be a matter of course in the future.

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meta has a very bad track record, but on the other hand I would be happy to be able to follow famous people that are only on Threads from my privacy-respecting services.

    I see Threads federation something like an RSS feed. It’s not inherently bad per se.

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Their goal is pretty standard affair.

    1. Claim to be simply making yourself part of the group for the benefit of everyone. We’re all gonna be friends, this is good for you, you’ll see.
    2. Use your position and resources to make yourself the defacto way to use the tech. Bonus points of you can make the average person see you and said tech as being one in the same.
    3. Once you have gathered a high enough percentage of the users, simply make changes or take other actions that will cut yourself off from everywhere else, effectively cutting off those users from anywhere that is not you. Since most of them are already “your” users, barely any of them will even notice anything change, let alone care.
    4. Repeat previous steps for any new competing service that covers along to threaten you.
  • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meta are war criminals. Period.

    If you support Meta attaching to the fediverse, you are welcoming war criminals and their quislings to becoming part of the fediverse.

    I sincerely hope most of us in the fediverse are better than that or I’m going to have to search for a new social media home.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta has been a willing tool for enabling war crimes, genocide, political manipulation/propaganda, and brutal authoritarianism all across the globe.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m skeptical anything good will come out of it, but I’m glad if I’m wrong. Meta is about making money. The fediverse is a direct competitor to everything and anything they do. I don’t think Meta is interested in integrating with the fediverse. I think they want to dominate the fediverse. But that’s just me.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism believes selfishness is a virtue. And capitalists believe they are a benefit to society by being as selfish as possible. Anything good that comes from them is purely accidental.

      That said, them connecting to the federverse is a much bigger risk for threads than it is for the federverse. We came here purposely to not be subject to them. They have no power over here. And next to none of us will ever be enticed away from here to there. However they cannot compete with the currently failing Twitter. And they need the dedicated long-term engagement. They have decent numbers. But only because they’re pulling from a pre-existing user base. That isn’t really interacting.

      The main thing is to not get stuck in a self-destructive rhetoric cycle. Like people did with Google talk and XMPP. No one used Google talk for XMPP. It was just a nice side effect for a while that they interoperated. When Google closed it off they did not kill XMPP. XMPP still exists, and those of us that used it were weirdos in the first place who still used it afterwards. Threads may have a little something to offer. But we will lose nothing if they leave.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The fediverse is a direct competitor to everything and anything they do. I don’t think Meta is interested in integrating with the fediverse.

      Right and this is really all that even needs to be said. There is nothing meta can do or say that will make this not true and there is no possibility that overtime meta won’t make decisions according to this power relation.

      The future fediverse we all day dream about when we are in an optimistic mood is literally a catastrophic fail state for a corporate social media company like meta. We see the plot of a happy uplifting family action movie, meta sees a horrific slasher movie.

  • Quokka@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still feel strongly against it.

    I’ll possibly end up leaving the Fediverse and finding a nice forum where I know corpos will never ruin.

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It can be both a “good” opportunity and bad but given the way Meta had to change its name to Meta after getting into trouble with running its platform to encourage fascism in national election outcomes … I think it’s safe to say the good that could possibly come of the federation does not outweigh the probable bad. I don’t agree with anything Zuckerfuck touches being anything close to reasonable to work with. Meta/Facebook’s track record isn’t something to ignore.