• ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You mean to tell me Elon’s little neo-Nazi shithole might not be properly moderating content to stay on the right side of hate speech laws? …Yeah that’s not surprising.

      • Gigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fortunately, the US has free speech protections. It’s not up to some bureaucrats to decide what opinions are illegal.

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it were up to the US Congress to decide what is considered hate speech I don’t think it would work out. The GOP would want to make calling someone “racist” hate speech.

          • Gigan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly! You never know who is going to be in charge next, so be very careful what kind of powers you give to the government.

          • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Calling someone racist is reverse-racism! /s

            No but seriously, I’ve heard this plop out of a few peoples mouth holes.

        • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok but what if someone figured out where you lived, doxed you and got a mob of angry racists to threaten your family? Maybe it was a joke, but given the amount of extremist angry conservatives these days maybe that threat of violence is real.

          Do you think that is ok? What if so many people were hate messaging you that it utterly overwhelmed your ability to even go on your favorite social network? What if you woke up one day and one of those internet users drove by your house and left a note threatening your life on your door?

          These aren’t hypothetical questions, this is what awful people do when you don’t curtail hate speech (and actively support it like musk does). There are REAL WORLD violent consequences for it and if you have never felt the fear from being targeted by a mob of irrationally angry strangers that want to hurt you than you just don’t really have any meaningful perspective to talk about “free speech” like you are.

          Sure some of the hypotheticals I brought up are also illegal, but there is always a throbbing tumor of bigots spewing hate speech at each other at the heart of this kind of thing that these actions grow out of. These people need to be isolated, shamed and alienated from normal social circles for their behavior or things become dangerous for real human beings. You don’t negotiate with these people, you show them the door when they start spewing hate speech.

          • Gigan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, that’s where I draw the line. I don’t believe inciting violence should be covered under free speech.

            • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Neither do I, which is why I support not allowing hate speech because the end goal is always violence or the threat of violence whether the people spewing it are conscious of it or not. The lame hateful racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic jokes that punch down at stereotypes are an advertisement for an ideology of hate (like a lightbulb for moths) and a test to see if that hate will be allowed to flourish in a community.

              • Gigan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I disagree that the end goal is always violence. And I think what constitutes “hate speech” is subjective and cannot be fairly enforced.

                • muse@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Power is the end goal. Violence will be used when no more power can be obtained by legal and nonviolent means.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it’s Musk who decides what gets boosted or banned, that’s oh so much better.

      • vexikron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is this surprising to you?

        Half of the US votes for christian nationalist theological fascists that have already successfully banned everything to do with lgtbq people existing in many parts of the country, and about 1/3 of the US population believes in all or significant parts of the insanely hateful and delusional QAnon conspiracy universe.

        You must not be American, or follow American domestic politics closely?

        The Republicans control Congress which means the Democrats cannot pass any legislation, and are in fact bogged down fighting off insane nonsense to basically either somehow give more money to the already wealthy, or fighting off insane shit to take away even more basic rights for minorities.

        Its basically illegal to get an abortion now in half the country.

        And Trump has now multiple times just said he will be a dictator if he wins in 2024, and is currently leading in the polls.

        Like, if you are European, can I fake marry your daughter or something to get the hell out of this collapsing basket case of a society?

        • biofaust@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You guessed it, I am not American.

          Nor I have time to spend following the domestic politics of a country that was decadent when it was founded by terrorists (according to its own Constitution).

          I am surprised still because this is 2023 and you are behaving literally medieval de facto instituting a new kind of feudalism gibing power to these people.

          • vexikron@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The easiest way to explain this to a non American is that Americans are highly selfish, vain, anti intellectual, ignorant and superficial compared to much of the rest of the world.

            Hence me asking about getting out.

            Years ago now I was telling my friends that QAnon was such a serious problem that it would endanger the country and even the rest of the world very seriously. I have a degree in Econ and another in Poli Sci, so I was able to explain in detail a worst case scenario.

            Then Jan 6th happened, far exceeding my worst fears.

            A week or so before one friend told me nah man nobody believes in QAnon before, old meme bro.

            Then after Jan 6th they spent a year calling me hyperbolic for describing what Trump and other MAGA Republicans were doing as fascist.

            I no longer speak with them, as in addition to being infuriatingly politically illiterate, they are generally insufferable people who bicker about each other constantly.

            Anyway… yeah. We live in a cyberpunk dystopia over here, half corporate exploitation of everything material, half cruel, absurd and hypocritical hyper christian fundamentalism over our minds.

            • biofaust@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll let you onto a little secret about Europeans: we don’t don’t give half a shit about the US and their “politics”.

              You may well argue that we have your bases in our territory, NATO and your social networks influencing our lives, but I see that as our internal problem of still having to grow a proper pair, rather than an interesting consequence of whatever medieval situation you’re brewing in there.

              And you wish you were in a cyberpunk dystopia. You’re in a boring one.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I think is surprising is how many still use the fucking platform. It’s completely neutered. Companies shouldn’t be posting news to it because unless you have an account you probably can’t fucking view it.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same. I’m surprised so many people still use for networking at all. I’ll see people post links to the site and I’m just like “well I wish I could’ve seen that. Oh well.”

        • biofaust@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t really see a difference in Twitter pre- and post-Musk. It is literally built for this, for broadcasting with minimal discussion afterwards. I left Twitter a bit before Musk got it because I realized Reddit was better for discussing and obtaining informed opinions. And now I left Reddit.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what I mean. I mean literally not being able to access stuff when you’re not logged in. How am I supposed to know what this company is posting?

            • biofaust@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think this could have been the normal evolution of the social network under anyone else than Musk. I repeat, it has always been built this way, for broadcasting. And I am sorry to fire on the Red Cross, but Mastodon is just the same: the only reason it is somewhat better than what Twitter was is that it is novel and barely populated and therefore elicits what in Italy we call mountain path courtesy.

    • vexikron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dont worry, even if Elon tanked the whole company by publicly telling its main customers, advertisers, to all go fuck themselves, its gonna be the new paypal with 100 trillion dollars in transactions!

      Yes thats right, the company that can barely ever turn a profit, that just corporate public image suicided, and also fired nearly all its staff and now has an insanely toxic work environment that everyone competent is avoiding like the plague…

      Fuck i cant even keep up the gimmick.

      Elon and everything connected to him is so fucking fucked.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t obey his bullshit rebranding. That platform will forever be known as Muskspew.

  • ElJefe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good god, he looks like a bag of shit… I guess it tracks.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The social media platform X, formerly Twitter, is being investigated for allegedly breaking EU law on disinformation, illegal content and transparency, the European Commission has announced.

    The decision to launch formal infringement proceedings against the company, owned by the US billionaire Elon Musk, comes weeks after X was asked to provide evidence of compliance with new laws designed to eliminate hate speech, racism and fake news from platforms in the EU.

    Under the Digital Services Act, which came into force in August, a company can be fined 6% of its global income or be banned from operating across the EU if it is found to have breached the law.

    In a statement, the European Commission said it had taken the decision to launch proceedings against X on the basis of its “preliminary investigation”, which allegedly concerned the “dissemination of illegal content in the context of Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel”.

    The EU will investigate whether search on X boosts blue tick accounts and spreads content that users might mistake as from verified sources in the pre-Musk service.

    Earlier this year, Facebook, TikTok and the tech companies Google and Microsoft signed up to a code of conduct laid out by the EU to prepare for the new laws in the DSA.


    The original article contains 726 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!