• Animortis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, the important thing is we can still violently overthrow society when we don’t get our way. /s

  • themadgiggler@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love it when gun advocates say, “An armed society is a polite society.” Come on guys. Do you really believe that?

    • Tlazolteotl @lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I mean if everyone is armed you can only think if they are going to shoot first. Having access to lethal force so easily only leads to terrible things

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone who says that should look at the science and see that yes, the data supports easy access to lethal force does increase the frequency of violence.

    • coldv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like that abusive parent who mistaken fear and avoidance for respect.

    • anji@lemmy.anji.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      What they really mean is: Polite to them, the people with the means of easily inflicting deadly violence upon others.

      Gun ownership is just another expression of the deep selfishness ingrained in American culture.

      • sadreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In theory responsible gun ownership is check on the authority of the state…

        Of course in US we have armed degenerates causing havoc. It don’t have to be like this but for some reason it do be like that :/

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Gun ownership for “self defense”, yes.

        Gun ownership solely for sustainable hunting or protection from large animals like polar bears is a separate thing that doesn’t deserve to be lumped in with that hostile to humanity crap.

    • Another Person @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah that only works if everyone is openly armed and not suicidal, unstable, or just having a bad day and not giving a shit anymore. I’m sure it would be just fine…

  • ebits21@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Allowed to carry concealed weapons without a permit…

    America you are dumbbb. Sorry.