• Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Washington Institute for Near Eastern Affairs, a pro-Israel think tank based in Washington

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure there’s some Israeli diplomat who’s been working the past twenty years to normalize relations and is now sitting in their office with a gun in their mouth over just how far Israeli relations with Arab nations are gonna revert.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    A poll of random Saudi citizens is irrelevant — they have no say in their government.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When 96% of the population is vehemently for or against something, not even a totalitarian government can ignore it without consequences. Saudi Arabia was on its tracks to normalize diplomatic relationships with Israel before October, where have those intentions gone now?

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think a majority of the population supported normalization before October?

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t, sure, but “opposing that country because they’re treating some other Muslims badly” is pretty different from “opposing that country after I’ve seen images of brutal attacks against other Muslims week after week in recent memory”.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s true. I still don’t think the Saudi oligarchy really cares, but we’ll see.

      • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel you underestimate Saudi Arabia’s ability to be totalitarian. And while the population might disagree with leadership on this issue, it doesn’t mean they disagree on all issues and are about to start a revolution about this one issue.

        But, more importantly, Saudi Arabia is the USAs most significant ally in the middle east. Losing access to American made weapons is more worrying to the Saudi Arabian Royal Family than losing the popular support of the domestic population. Because with American weaponry one can easily coerce the domestic population.

        I feel those intentions to normalize relations are still there behind closed doors and will play out in the long run.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You heavily overestimate them. Saudi already has bent to the population before when they tried to westernize too fast and it blew up in their faces. That’s why MBS now openly says he wants to do it gradually.

          Some of the most the most prominent guerilla fighters that beat America in resistance groups were actually Saudis that went to Jihad.

          If even America can’t beat those guys it’s impossible that a bunch of dudes with American weapons can, especially if they can’t just carpet bomb everything American style because it’s their own country.

          The Saudi royals would love to get rid of their religious population and sell out to America they can’t.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When 96% of the population is vehemently for or against something, not even a totalitarian government can ignore it without consequences.

        Imposing those consequences on the government will mean those citizens will stop getting their handouts from the government . They’re not going to risk it over this.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    When the butchers of Yemen are looking at your genocide and saying “this is a bit much” its probably a bad sign.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the Saudi citizen, not the government. I’d still like to say that the government stance is “keep giving me your money and weapons and I’ll turn a blind eye”.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s telling that they only care when these Muslims die, because they’re being killed by Israel

      Don’t fool yourself into thinking these hellstates are doing anything but playing team sports.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that the Saudis care that it’s bad enough to use as leverage, which is to say that the Monarchy is still wholly morally bankrupt.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course. To show the world israel is a genocidal Nazi ethno state.

      And israel of course did the exact thing they were expected to do, genocidal Nazi stuff.

      Before the war everyone, even the west, said to israel “If you do genocide you’re only gonna create more Hamas” then israel said “No trust me bro it’s just a special military operation we never lie here”. And then of course they did genocide because that’s the only thing their government knows to do.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t misrepresent their narrative. They never said it was a special military operation or anything short of a war. They were very clear that they were decorating war on Hamas and anything short of a complete Hamas surrender was inadequate. They have not decorated from this.

        • Why9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The casualties suggest Hamas is collateral damage. The target, as has been made abundantly clear at this point, is the civilian population of Gaza.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Any other army on earth would have similar civilian casualties going into that dense an area. Most would be worse.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hamas actually had a 2/3 civilian casualty rate compared to israels 74/75

              Of course Hamas actually risked their own lives and did targeted attacks on military bases instead of bombing children’s hospitals with guided missles.

              Fun fact, with their current targeting accuracy the IDF Nazis would need to kill more Palestinians than actually than exist in Gaza to kill Hamas.

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hamas targeted military outposts as a means to attacking civilian targets including a music festival and families face to face. The IDF targets military targets embedded within civilian areas. Hamas embedds themselves within civilian areas to ensure maximum civilian casualties of they are targeted. This isn’t even a question at this point. The criticism is the continuation of the targeting despite it.

                Again, any army on earth would produce the same results including NATO.