cross-posted from: https://social.fossware.space/post/123876

In the few short hours since I started using #Threads, #DuckDuckGo has already blocked over 200 data tracking attempts. These include things like “headphone status” and “screen density.”

Trackers, trackers and ol’ Zucc’s roboface galore.

      • jdevsd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some, like location can be blocked and same for health & fitness. You can also tell iOS to not allow an app to track you but I don’t think that blocks everything. But say you allow access to “all photos” that means they can parse the exif data from all your photos and have map of everywhere they were taken.

        • donut4ever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is nuts. Why would anyone let this through knowingly? I fight so hard to at least make as hard as possible for these assholes to collect info on me. People just this shit and agree to all of that without batting an eye.

    • Niello@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s probably more meaningful to ask at this point what data can he collects that he’s not collecting.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because to find the needle in the haystack, you first need a haystack. Until you know which needle you want to use, you need loads of haystacks which could have the needle in it you need.

      Also, hoarders gotta hoard. (and bastards collect all they can get away with, and more, lots more)

      • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, they probably don’t need all of that info right now, but you never knew when something suddently becomes valuable. Also, the more data they have, the easier to identify you without any trackers like cookies.

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically something like this:

          “The algorithm suggests people who have their phone in landscape more than 28% of the time are more likely to vote for party A. Convincing them not to vote for party A is hard, so we’ll convince them there’s no point voting or make it harder for them to vote, by targeting these users with ads which make them question if their vote matters.”

          • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t worry. Some bright marketing genius will market the ability to change voting preferences by making people only use their phone in landscape orientation.

  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    No wonder the app is not available in Europe, there is no way that list passes GDPR :P

    • Gulmar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was honestly wondering what this app is cause I haven’t heard of it.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      No but it needs access to your front camera so it can record your face before and after using threads. They want to see if their engagement algorithms made you mad so then they can tell it’s working

  • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jfc man, thanks for the hot tip on the ddg tracker protection! I’ve been using ddg for a while now on the phone and have out some effort into curating apps so most of what I have is private/secure/open source, but I still have a bunch of things like the Netflix app that I know are sketchy. I’ve just gone through every app I have and confirmed things like Jerboa, VLC, antenna pod, etc are all free of trackers. The real fun surorises though were my bank app and my state government services app, which are each on about 45 tracking attempts across 36 categories. The services one even uses two seperste tracker companies. That’s super fun!

    Fuck I’m glad I have this ddg add on now :D

    • PieMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn duckduckgo app protection is great! I’d never heard about it, installed and turned on now. Good call-out, thank you.

      I encourage others to look this up too!

      • Screwthehole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got it running yesterday after seeing this thread. No noticeable difference to me, very noticeable difference to the online leech companies. I’m a happy camper

          • Screwthehole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s working great. 36 hours in and more than 33,000 tracking attempts blocked. It’s mind boggling

            And worst offenders are places I wouldn’t have expected, like the docusign app, and being scraped by companies I’ve never heard of like comScore and bugsnag

              • Screwthehole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh ya you download the browser app, then turn on app tracker blocking in settings. I couldn’t find it at first, but just googled it and the first answer worked. So all ya need is the duckduckgo app. At least, on Android

  • Facebook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hi there, and thanks for trying Threads!

    While this may look alarming, it’s nothing to be concerned about. Sometimes “privacy” focused browsers and apps can be a little overzealous.

    We are taking our mandate to be a responsible member of the fediverse seriously, and part of that is building trust. We have no intention of abusing your data, nor the trust you place in us.

    Thanks for helping us blaze this trail together!

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Potentially, and Ive also seen it used for ads. The first time Spotify noticed me mute my system and paused the ad, I became enraged. Its’s a step too far. Luckily with external speakers I can just mute at the speaker level instead.

        • Midnight_Ice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s like that Black Mirror episode where the people are required to keep their eyes open and focused on the screen for everything

        • Schwim Dandy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re using Spotify on Windows, consider installing a system ad blocker like Adguard for Windows and route Spotify traffic through it. It will strip the ads.

          If you’re using Spotify on Android, consider installing the app through X-Manager, which will give you an ad-free experience.

          • njordomir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This was at work a few years ago. I don’t use windows at home. But thank you for providing those recommendations. Hopefully a fellow Lemming will find them useful!

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Facebook I’m only comfortable using inside a browser for this reason, and not with Chrome either. Something proper like Firefox that can block third party cookies and run it in a container automatically so it can’t follow you around. I need to contain the filth.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What kind of addon do you use to contain the tracking cookies on Firefox? I’d really like to get it too.

      • SkipperWannabe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is also this official extension. IIRC, this also makes sure that all the meta owned sites are not able to interact with other sites, but can work fine with each other. It also makes sure that any links leading to their sites also only open in the container, maybe also sanitized to remove the tracker from original link. The last part I am not sure, as I might be confusing it with a different extension. But if you are using any of the Meta sites, I would recommend it.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s built into Firefox! You don’t need one.

        Click on the shield icon in the upper left (on Desktop) and from there you can get into your tracking protection settings. It also has a dashboard showing what has been blocked. Categories are social media, tracking cookies, tracking content, fingerprinting, and cryptominers. Facebook containers are also built into Firefox on desktop. That feature is called Container Tabs and is in settings also.

        On Firefox for Android, you go to the three dots thing -> Settings -> Enhanced Tracking Protection.

        Most browsers today have something like this built-in because it’s such a problem, except Chrome, because Google is an ad company first and would be shooting their own foot.

    • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t even type fa in by Firefox without the Facebook containers extension. And yeah, chrome can jam it

  • Darkhoof@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will completely empty out Twitter. It’s just like that scene on Godzilla when both monsters are fighting and the science dude just says to “let them fight”.

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, kinda. The crowd that cares move to Mastodon, that crowd that chases moves to Threads.

      Now, there is still value in Twitter as long as content creators and companies post there. When we see companies pull out and content creators en masse setting up shop somewhere else the end is coming. Huge communites that depend on being huge rarely if ever can return from a real downwards spiral.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re already seeing a lot of the celebrities and brands move over. I imagine their replies being filled with normal people rather than the blue check crypto nerds is a pretty big draw.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just cannot fathom why people would see the shortest that Musk has made of Twitter and think the best solution is to go to a clone made by Zuckerberg. Have they learned nothing?

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because fundamentally, people really don’t care about all that much. They want a simple social network that’s vaguely pleasant to use, has the people and content they’re looking for, and otherwise stays out of their way. They certainly don’t care about Musk’s random crusade du jour against the evil woke libs.

      Nor do they particularly care about targeted advertising so long as it remains vaguely unobtrusive and their data isn’t constantly leaked in ways that directly harm them. Zuck, for all his many flaws, is smart enough to know that the single biggest thing he can do is to largely stay out of the way.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because people just submit it. He doesn’t know why. They just trust him. Dumb Fucks.

      • Ragnell@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Worse. No one trusts Zuckerberg, they just all figure nothing bad will happen. “He’s got everyone’s data anyway.” They don’t think.

        • ekZepp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          99% of times “stupidity” is just a lack of information, interest and prospective who let people don’t see how someone else problem could very well become “their” problem too given enough time.