The Capillary Cup is a zero-gravity cup designed by NASA astronaut Donald Pettit on the International Space Station. The product is an open drinking cup designed to be used in a microgravity environment, developed from Pettit’s desire to drink water without a bag and straw in outer space.

    • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Rather the other way around. If it can keep a baby inside for nine months it can probably hold some coffee.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ah yes that thing where you design something based on something in nature that does what you want…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well it’s a cup. So I assume so.

      I don’t get how you’re supposed to drink out of it in zero g though as tilting it wouldn’t do anything. In the image he hasn’t perpet which sort of defeats the purpose.

      • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m guessing you swirl it around and it comes out somewhat controlled either at the top or bottom. Not sure though.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I read through a couple of articles on it, and the design is rather smart. To my understanding of the fluid dynamics involved, the liquid in the cup basically sticks to the sides the the inside of the cup, there’s a thin valley like channel that leads up towards the mouth piece. That valley encourages the liquid to travel up to the mouthpiece by capillary action. The mouthpiece holds the liquid in place by expanding outward rapidly from where the channel ends (this is the flange part that looks naughty as everyone has been joking about).

        So the drinking action would be to bring the mouthpiece to your lips, and once you make contact the capillary action and surface contact leads the liquid into your mouth.

        The liquid would move rather slowly compared to terrestrial allegories of the same, but if you’re only drinking a few sips of coffee or something it shouldn’t be significantly different.

        I’m sure this would work in the normal method in earth gravity, but because of the strong gravitational force, I’ve come to conclude that the capillary action of the cup would be massively countered by gravity and it would not function in the same manner on earth. The microgravity environment, IMO, is critical to have for the physics for the liquid flow work as intended.

  • metallic_substance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If there’s a better litmus test of how male-forward this community is, I can’t think of a better one than this comment section. Well done, idiots (I mean that with only a smidgen of judgement)

    • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Release the liquid without gravity? I’m pretty sure any bottle design would need to be collapsible - basically becoming a bag at that point - to work in zero g, but maybe I misunderstand how these cups are supposed to work.

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just remember, when you’re using a straw, it’s not your suction that pulls liquid into your mouth, it’s the difference in the air pressure between the two that pushes it into your mouth.

    • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d imagine that it’s because there’s complications when being used in microgravity. The people are literal rocket scientists and astrophysicists. I think they’ve got a good grasp on problem solving.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The same people who asked if 100 tampons was enough for 14 days might not have the best grasp on all things.

        Maybe they’ve never even seen one of these devices before and never considered it, who knows.

        • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I just read the book A City on Mars (which I recommend) and they talk about how that tampon anecdote gets spread around as if it shows how clueless NASA men are, but really it’s an illustration of how risk averse NASA is. Basically, no one knew how menstruation would go in space. Because of microgravity other bodily functioning gets screwed up, so the engineers aimed for enough tampons to cover the worst possible bleeding and then added a 100% safety margin. That’s what they were asking the female astronauts, does this bandolier of tampons fulfill that requirement. They do the same thing with other tolerances, like the inflatable habitat: will this thing take five times the expected air pressure without exploding?

          • Deceptichum@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Except that’s not what happened

            “I remember the engineers trying to decide how many tampons should fly on a one-week flight; they asked, ‘Is 100 the right number?’” Ride recalled, according to the transcript. She replied that, “No, that would not be the right number.”

            “They said, ‘Well, we want to be safe,’” continued Ride. “I said, ‘Well, you can cut that in half with no problem at all.’”

            NASA engineers apparently had a history of sending women to space with inadequate supplies. In that same interview, Ride noted that the engineers had also decided that women astronauts would want makeup. So, they designed a makeup kit.

            “The engineers at NASA, in their infinite wisdom, decided that women astronauts would want makeup — so they designed a makeup kit,”

            • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I hope the authors won’t mind if I post an excerpt here, they do a few paragraphs later give a different example of “NASA engineers not understanding female anatomy”. Here’s a little of the relevant section, which is itself more of an aside from the main subject of the book:

              "Here’s the thing: Dr. Rhea Seddon, the only combination medical doctor, astronaut, and period-haver in the class of ’78, helped make the decision about how many tampons to include. According to a 2010 interview, the large number of tampons was a safety consideration. As she said, “There was concern about it. It was one of those unknowns. A lot of people predicted retrograde flow of menstrual blood, and it would get out in your abdomen, get peritonitis, and horrible things would happen.”

              According to Seddon, the women were skeptical of the concerns, and their preference was not to treat it as a problem unless it became a problem. But she was involved with the final decision made with the flight surgeons, and according to her:

              We had to do worst case. Tampons or pads, how many would you use if you had a heavy flow, five days or seven days of flow. Because we didn’t know how it would be different up there. What’s the max that you could use? Most of the women said, “I would never, ever use that many.” “Yes, but somebody else might. You sure don’t want to be worried about do I have enough.”

              In other words, the story may have been less about idiot male techs and more about the NASA approach of solving all problems with more equipment. As Seddon remembers it, they decided to take the maximum amount they imagined a woman with a heavy period could need, multiplied that by two, and then added 50 percent more.

              This would be typical NASA behavior—if you read the 1,300-page long Human Integration Design Handbook, which we unfortunately have, you will encounter the word “maximum” 257 times, as on page 604, which contains a remarkably detailed treatment of Number 1, including what you might call a peequation,

              VU = 3 + 2t,

              where VU is the maximum total urine output in liters per crewmember, and t is the number of days of the mission.

              In the case of tampons, the excessive concern may have been appropriate. Lynn Sherr, longtime journalist, friend to a number of female astronauts, and also Sally Ride’s biographer, said the first woman who ever menstruated in space had problems with “leakage.” Remember, space is awful. There is no gravity to pull fluids in a generally downward direction. Blood, through a process called capillary action, tends to climb out.[*] According to Sherr, that anonymous astronaut elected to wear a tampon as well as a pad."

    • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because there’s no upsidedown in space. A sippy cup works by using gravity, you have to turn the cup upsidedown to get the liquid to go to the sippy spout so you can suck it out. In outer space the liquid would just be floating free inside the sippy cup and not near the spout for you to suck it out.

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        They make sippy cups with straws, it has a little thing that goes all the way down to the bottom and like a soft silicone straw built-in to the top.

        • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But the whole premise of this device is that the person didn’t want to drink from something straw-like. Which a sippy cup is to begin with.