I’m firmly on the side of “water is not wet” in this debate, but it’s a question that I was asked while I was high and have no answer to it. Water cannot itself be wet because you can’t get water on water. However, what is a fish in a lake? It can’t be wet until it’s taken out of the water, but it’s not dry either. Is it something else?

  • deepthot@lemmy.sdf.org
    10·
    1 year ago

    So, just to understand your position - is a soaked sponge not wet?

    I think a fish in water is still wet (i.e. in contact with some amount of water) but that’s superseded by the fact that it’s immersed in water, and thus not a very meaningful attribute.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldOP
      2·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never seen a sponge sink on its own, so in some sense they will always either wet or dry when not in use. If something holds a sponge under water, it becomes immersed and gains this mysterious new property

    • freehugs@lemmy.world
      31·
      1 year ago

      Lol, I’ve yet figure out what umami actually tastes like. I know salty, sweet, sour,… but wtf is umami? Every example/description of it sounds completely different. Can I go buy an umami-spice somewhere? Can it even be isolated? Does “umami” actually exist, or was it made up to trigger the shit out of people whenever someone mentions it online??

      K, I’ll see myself out.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      1·
      1 year ago

      Saturation is moreso about having water (or any substance, really) within and throughout a thing. Being in or out of water doesn’t matter since that’s just concerning the outside.

  • keenanpepper@sopuli.xyz
    121·
    1 year ago

    Particle man, particle man

    Doing the things a particle can

    …

    When he’s underwater does he get wet?

    Or does the water get him instead?

    Nobody knows, Particle man

  • Kissaki@feddit.deEnglish
    8·
    1 year ago

    Water cannot itself be wet because you can’t get water on water.

    I disagree with this assessment.

    Water itself is wet. It’s an inherent property.

    Water on water changes nothing. It’s still wet.

    Water is a liquid. Water on something not wet makes it wet - through wet water attachment. It’s wet as long as it has water attached.

    Something not wet submerged in water consequently must be wet. Although it’s not particularly verifyable due to its submerged nature. You touching it means also touching all the water around it. But I don’t see how it’s wet property would be different from it with only a little water on it.

    Thinking of a sponge - it will take in water and be considered wet. This also is the case in water. It won’t stay indistinguishable.