I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy’s massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It’s been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let’s say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they’re what’s colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn’t be much of an issue if they didn’t regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, …

As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.

I posted a comment in this thread linking to “https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs” (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren’t widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the “Be nice and civil” rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.

This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:

Definitely a trend there wouldn’t you say?

When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.

Proof:

So many of you will now probably think something like: “So what, it’s the fediverse, you can use another instance.”

The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they’re not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it’s rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there’s nobody to discuss anything with.

I’m not sure if there’s a solution here, but I’d like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    as a communism sympathizing leftist, i hated these mods on reddit and i hate them here. the behavior is idiotic

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      That’s the most frustrating part. These “leftists” are the stupid kind who seem to care more about relitigating idiotic cold war drama than evolving or pushing forward leftist philosophy. It’s straight up brain rot, mixed with obvious right wing agitprop disguised as leftist ideology. That fact that anyone other than trolls, spies and teenagers would engage with it is astounding.

          • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            27 days ago

            Tough game, as part of their “super authentic bff” relationship they seem to be loosely coordinating social media disinformation operations.

        • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          27 days ago

          If .ml is a CCP propaganda, then blahaj and co are terrorists.

          It’s pretty weird with massive amount of money CCP has, they decide to spread propaganda on, gasp, smol forums like Fediverse.

          Not that I support .ml, I don’t care either way, I just find your view… weird.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        Some people just have daddy issues and need an image of a power figure to guide their life. It’s obvious on the right, but I’ve seen various shades of it in the left as well.

      • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Cold war drama is still alive and well. You could see it when people call freaking Bernie, or even more laughably Biden, a communist, or in the fall out of every country in the global south, from Latin America to the Middle East, from propped up divisions of countries in East Asia, to the poor former Soviet block of Eastern European countries looted in the wake of the fall of the USSR. Our present interference in South Korea, Taiwan, Cubs Afghanistan, Yemen, and elsewhere are all relics of that time. The US has never really left the red scare mindset, and the global geopolitics of that era will reverberate for generations to come. It’s why everyone celebrated when Kissinger died.

        Still, saying all that commie and socialist stuff, I still think lemmy.ml is too ban happy. I like that they don’t defederate as fast as Lemmy.world, which I think is too eager on that front. But in terms of their posting moderation, I think lemmy.ml is way too heavy handed, and hence I don’t like their moderation style at all. It’s why I made sure not to choose either of those instances despite them being the biggest and most default. I do like having the choice, though, which is one big thing I like about the fediverse. There’s no way to avoid that kind of shit on Reddit. I just wish people would split up the communities among different instances better, though.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    I don’t think there is a solution.
    Effective moderation to protect vulnerable people needs more centralization. Avoiding the influence of bad-actor mods needs more decentralization. The two seem fairly mutually exclusive. Or rather, they trade off against each other.

    With more users, having a fractured community wouldn’t be a huge problem, because they could all have critical mass. But with the current user base that is generally not feasible, even for really popular topics.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Effective moderation to protect vulnerable people needs more centralization.

      No it doesn’t. Centralization would make it so that if there are bad mods, you would have nowhere to go instead. That’s how reddit is - if you don’t like the mods in a subreddit, tough luck.

      Decentralisation helps by providing alternatives if the existing mods/admins go bad.

      • GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Man do you know how many instances exist? I hate this idea of trying to coordinate defederation across all bigger instances all at once. You have the option of migrating to an instance which is already defederated from them, or hosting your own instance and defederating from whoever you want. You can also mute them. Don’t come to a decentralized network with the expectation of imposing centralized decision making behaviour?

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’m talking about systemic solutions for the general problem of bad-actor mods.

        Defederating an instance is fracturing the community which difficult for a community to withstand with our current user numbers.

        Giving mods less power, such as making communities themselves defederated, makes problems for good-faith mods who are trying to protect vulnerable community members.

        It’d be neat if the community itself could vote to migrate to a new instance, but that’d be so fraught with abuse that I can’t see it actually working.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          It’d be neat if the community itself could vote to migrate to a new instance

          You kind of already can do this. It’s just that instead of voting directly, people choose individually where to go instead. That is also kind of a “vote” - you vote by choosing a community and so whichever gets most votes becomes the new major community of that topic.

          There is no need for a systematic solution, it is already in place. The admins/mods of lemmy.ml are acting in questionable ways and people are pointing this out and some are even trying to rally to defederate and trying to get people to move off the instance and all that. This is the systematic solution. The system is working as intended.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            But again that fractures the community.

            You lose all the community history, and not everyone migrates to the new community. You end up with a bunch of new splinter communities, none of which have critical mass to survive.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              You can’t have decentralisation without the possibility of some amount of fracturing. I mean decentralization is essentially fractured by design. I think this won’t be such a big problem in the future as instances and communities mature more.

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                25 days ago

                I don’t necessarily agree that decentralized is fractured by design, nor that “working as intended” means that it’s the best solution for this/every situation.

                I’m saying that as we decentralize, we get both advantages and disadvantages. I’m saying that this is a situation where we can’t both have our cake and eat it too.

                For example:
                We could decentralize communities themselves, preventing them from fracturing. Instead of having communities hosted on a single instance, communities could be feeds aggregating all posts tagged as belonging to that community. Then if you defederate an instance you simply stop seeing posts from users in that instance.
                But then good-faith mods are defanged and can no longer protect vulnerable community members from antagonistic actors.

                I think my straw example tradeoff is a bad one, that’s too much decentralization of power.

  • hipsterdoofus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Unfortunately, lemmy.ml is run by lemmy’s actual developers and will likely remain one of the most popular instances. Best thing to do is block the instance and host new communities on other instances.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      That kind of makes me a bit more skeptical of Lemmy as a whole if I’m being honest. Not necessarily the instance owners, but the system as a whole.

        • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Lemmy.world is biased, but in a way that’s harder to see. They’re more liberal and centrist, which isn’t political in the same way being white “isn’t”. It seems like it isn’t because it’s the default of the English speaking West.

          But still, ya, lemmy.ml needs to cool it with the bans and heavy handed moderation. I’m glad it’s not the biggest anymore but now I think everything is too much on Lemmy.world. I wish people would split up their accounts and communities on more instances instead of putting it all on one (or two). This and Reddit is a great example of why we shouldn’t be giving the same people power over everything.

          • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            27 days ago

            Just like there’s no such thing as an unbiased person, there’s no unbiased instance. Better to know what you’re getting into than to assume what you’re reading isn’t coming from a particular point of view.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              I’d say the problem with bias isn’t that it exists, but when it’s covert. The ML instances were covert for a while if you weren’t paying attention, LW is “centrist” and “neutral” which means it defaults to a vaguely conservative position (conservative in the sense of being passively okay with the status quo, not the US sense in which conservative is an electoral party), but it remains covert simply by being default.

              It also has open sign up which means anyone can sign up, which will tend to attract people who know their politics suck, so it will tend to attract unpleasant users.

              Another instance with open sign up is sh.itjust.works which I’ve noticed a lot of the more toxic assholes I’ve dealt with come from. I imagine having profanity implied in their name doesn’t help with that.

              Whereas instances like lemmy.blahaj.zone and beehaw.org wear their bias on their sleeves and require sign ups be approved. I chose slrpnk.net for a similar reason. These instances seem like a much nicer experience in general, and I would recommend anyone wanting to join lemmy find an instance that they like that has an approval process.

              I think the fediverse presents a vision of an internet based on trust, and I think that sign up process is an important place to start building that trust.

        • sudneo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          They were openly discouraging people to sign up on .ml already a year ago (I remember a banner to register elsewhere). I don’t think “anything” in particular is working. The devs seem not to care less for having the biggest instance, or communities there etc. They had the instance long before most of Lemmy users joined, after all.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        27 days ago

        We all have to wrestle with those ethics ourselves, but fwiw most of us have come down to the idea that writing code is one thing whereas administering an instance is something else altogether. People are working on other implementations of the ActivityPub protocol e.g. Kbin, its community fork Mbin, and things like sublinks that doesn’t fully exist yet.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      54
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m staring at the front page of lemmy.ml and I’m trying to find what’s got people so worked up. It seems fairly simple to not go into a prolonged rant about how much you hate China when the content is just silly imgr memes.

      I mean, by all means, block it if you don’t like the content. But why are you obsessed with the modlogs of an instance you blocked?

  • lltnskyc@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    You don’t see even a bit of hypocrisy in that? Holy shit…
    I have exactly the same complaint about lemmy.world - it’s censuring everything that doesn’t align with leftist views (and on the other hand, when I post on lemmy.ml it’s usually not deleted).
    Oh I know, I know, let me guess, they are censoring people because they are evil and authoritarian and are bad people, but you are censuring people because you are all democratic and for freedom and so on and anyway the ones that get censored are tankies and fascists and russian bots/propagandists?..
    https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/2355607-our-blessed-homeland-their-barbarous-wastes

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      It’s not exactly the same complaint at all. You got a single comment removed from a single thread by a single moderator.

      The equivalent would be if the admin of lemmy.world stepped in and not only banned you from World News but also every single other LW community you posted in, out of spite.

      • lltnskyc@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        27 days ago

        Okay, that’s fair enough.
        Still, complaining about censorship while engaging in censorship is hypocritical 🤷

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      27 days ago

      Yeah, very ironic that deleting misinformation is equated to deleting accurate information.

      • lltnskyc@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Oh yeah definitely, I forgot that one - everything they say is a misinformation, no matter the included sources and any proofs, and everything we say is the purest truth possible!
        Seriously, it’s like the meme was created exactly for this post 🙃

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          everything we say is the purest truth possible!

          People obsessed with purity will think like that.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’d like to note for the record that I downvoted you not for using the term “racist”, that definitely seems to be an accurate assessment, but for saying “European”. For one, a European racist wouldn’t care about Canada, for two, Indians aren’t really a large or noticeable or denigrated immigrant group anywhere in Europe but maybe the UK, and for three, UK racists wouldn’t care about “the continent”.

        No, what we’re looking at here seems to be a Canadian racist. They can keep them.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          You’re free to talk all you like, in fact -but you’re going to be rightfully considered a dipshit. It comes with the territory. Be prepared, my fragile friend.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          26 days ago

          Look, I’d love to discuss, but usually with this kind of bigotry it amounts to pissing in a violin. There’s no room for hate in my world

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yeah it was only a matter of time before you explicitly lumped Indians into the persona non grata list. I always knew you guys would eventually just say “fuck all brown people”. This is exactly why Indians born in the West to Indian immigrants have strong solidarity with other brown people regardless of their religion. We don’t trust you conservatives and never will.

      You came invaded our ancestral country, subjugated us, stole our natural resources, and divided us. You still have items you stole from us in your museums. And you have the audacity to say that Indians and Muslims are invading Europe after Europe invaded us and stole from us.

      Naw. This is why we’re on the left. Fuck you all. If you say we’re invading you, then fuck it. We are invading you, and we’ve raised “anchor babies” as sleeper cell spies – and we’re going to save the West from you pathetic conservative colonizers.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Best thing to do is to personally ask your instance admin to defederate, as well as other users and admins of other popular instances.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    Rule 1: Crushing people with tanks is fine so long as it’s our side doing it.

    Literal fucking tankies. I wonder if they will ever come to their senses. Oh well, it’s not as if there aren’t Nazi instances somewhere on fedi as well.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      27 days ago

      Crushing people with tanks

      Just a heads up, while it is established that the CCCP killed tons of people on that day, the idea that people were crushed with tanks is disputed in academia and mostly considered inaccurate news reporting.

      The famous “tank man” photo shows a guy standing in front of a tank in order to prevent them from moving tanks to another part where the protesters had gone. We have no evidence that he was driven over by that tank.

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Those “academics” are wrong.

        We know this because there are photos of bodies and bicycles smeared into a paste [Source. Warning Blood/Gore].

        And because people who were there literally said that’s what happened:

        "The shooting was going on and people were still running to try and block the tanks, which were travelling at high speed, some positioning buses in the road. But the tanks crushed the buses and people, they didn’t care. People’s bodies were merged, moulded to their bicycles. They were flat.” [Source: Shao Jiang to The Mirror]

        The CCP has desperately tried to cleanse the most brutal images and interviews of the massacre from the Internet, but even 30 years on they can’t completely scrub it clean. There’s a reason The Pillar of Shame monument is designed as it is.

        • Որբունի@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          No but the red paste is most likely explained by the tanks that were verifiably there. They could have crushed people with other machinery but they had tanks.

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      27 days ago

      A hexbear in that thread is literally claiming that “the soldiers did everything they could to avoid hurting him” when there’s a photo of him lying dead on the street after the tanks have gone through. They don’t think it’s fine, they’re saying it didn’t happen (curious)

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        He is bundled off to the left by other protestors, nobody knows what happened to him, there is no photo of him dead.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        That photo (I’ve seen it circulate on the internet myself) is a photoshop. Every reputable source says that no one knows what happened to that man, and we have no evidence whatsoever of him getting run over.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        This loony bullshit is why tankies go full useful idiot and parrot shit most of them know isn’t true. The right-wing disinfo about Tianamen square - or any other communist atrocity - is so widespread. Tankies think that the most ultra counter-narrative will somehow combat that even if its just as loony.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        A hexbear in that thread is literally claiming that “the soldiers did everything they could to avoid hurting him”

        ah the trolly problem defence

      • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        27 days ago

        Was it actually him? I was under the impression that history did not relate what happened to him afterwards, nor who he was. That’s not to say the CCP did not murder a couple of thousand people during the crackdown regardless, because they did, but I have never seen a verifiable claim that a picture of any particular corpse actually was the Tank Man. There are numerous theories I’ve seen floated over the years alleging what may have happened to him afterwards ranging from him being caught and imprisoned, executed, living anonymously in China, or fleeing to Taiwan. All of them are unverified and, of course, mutually exclusive.

        The tank operators absolutely did attempt to (and succeeded at) avoid running him over. That much is plainly visible in the video. Whatever happened after the video ended is undocumented and pure conjecture. Plenty of well documented atrocities actually were committed that day, before and after that moment, so there’s not much sense in inventing new ones and bickering over details we haven’t actually got.

  • archpope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    27 days ago

    Hmmm… I just got here so I haven’t seen it in action, but if true, far left mods abusing their power to censor and ban people they disagree with? Where have I Redd it before?

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    People are naive if they think the .ml admins and devs don’t intend to keep their thumb on the Lemmy scale. More instances need to take this threat seriously and defederate from .ml, and possibly even fork the Lemmy repos for when the devs inevitably decide they want to start building quiet exploits into the code. There are serious cyber security implications here that people are sleeping on

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      There are serious cyber security implications here that people are sleeping on

      No, there are not.

      At most, if they decide to kill the project by adding malicious code they can affect Lemmy itself. 99% of users don’t run Lemmy (which is where the “quiet exploits” would run), and the frontend simply doesn’t allow you to have a serious impact, unless you think they will stumble upon a browser 0-day and they decide to burn it by committing the exploit to an open source repo instead of selling it for millions (or use it elsewhere).

      What’s with the fearmongering? Their stance is crystal clear since ever.

      possibly even fork the Lemmy repos

      Right, and who maintains the fork? Who, among the large population of external contributor, I mean?

      • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        What do u mean their arnt any security issues here. Ive played enough 2b2t to know a backdoor makes u a literal fucking god. If u own all the servers u have everyone’s ip, u can control everyone’s interaction. U can can literally 1984 the entire federated history. Do u not see the issue here they could take control of your account post cp then report ur ip and get u locked up for long time.

        • sudneo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          I am a security engineer by profession, so I do have at least a decent understanding of what I am talking about. Every server in this case has that potential. There is nothing preventing any admin from patching code and manipulating the network after TLS termination (I.e., changing payloads of POST requests etc.). That said, not even in a videogame you would be “locked up” by someone posting CP on your behalf like that. This is simply not a threat and if you think it is, then you should be worried about every website you visit.

    • Skepticpunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      Yep. Something needs to change if we want Lemmy to be something besides a place for Soviet simps to hide from criticism. Authoritarianism cannot be tolerated.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        if we want Lemmy to be something besides a place for Soviet simps to hide from criticism

        There is definitely a place for Soviet simps in the Fediverse, it’s just in a corner all by itself. That’s the beauty of the Fediverse.

      • lltnskyc@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        27 days ago

        Authoritarianism cannot be tolerated.

        Except when it suits your agenda, in that case it’s not only tolerated, but actually encouraged! :)

          • lltnskyc@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            27 days ago

            You’re bored of people pointing out your hypocrisy?
            But it’s not surprising, you’re not supposed to be entertained by it, you’re supposed to think about it…

            • Skepticpunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              What is there to think about? I complain about people who support Soviet-style dictatorships having full control over online platforms moderating exactly as one would expect, and I get told by Random Guy On The Internet #368,452 that I’m apparently a hypocrite because wanting action to be taken to stop authoritarians from controlling social networks makes me the real authoritarian or something. All this to “suit my agenda”, which in this case is wanting to be able to say that authoritarians are bad.

              God forbid I find arguments like that incoherent and unworthy of taking seriously.

              • lltnskyc@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                26 days ago

                I’m apparently a hypocrite because wanting action to be taken to stop authoritarians from controlling social networks makes me the real authoritarian or something

                No, you’re a hypocrite because you see “them” censoring “you” and you scream “censure, you can’t do that!!”, but when it’s “your” side is censuring “them”, then you have no complaints, because obviously “your” censure is good, and their is “bad”.

                Or maybe I’m wrong and you’re against censure in general? :)

              • sudneo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                I complain about people who support Soviet-style dictatorships having full control over online platforms moderating exactly as one would expect

                I will ask in good faith: given that those people started the whole project to have that space, but built it using federated technologies which allow others to run their places, what is exactly the basis for your complaint? As absurd as they might be, instances can decide their own moderation policies, whether you or I agree with them or not. Given the fundamentally distributed nature of this platform, there is no such thing as “having full control”, and instead we can choose instances based on our preferences, so we are free to not subject ourselves to those policies, they are free to do, and both a free to use the platform in the way we use. The code is open, there are plenty of other instances. What exactly is the complaint here?

      • Oisteink@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        It’s also a great place for AI training as you have total access to data you federate to your instance. Or for Cambridge-Analytica to track tankies

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’ve had this happen to me, I was chatting in a thread with some guy about IP theft and plagiarism at universities- a legitimate discussion about a current topic- and all my comments were suddenly deleted for “xenophobia”. I let it go but its still really jarring and annoying.

    • lltnskyc@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      So, most of the fediverse instances don’t deserve attention is the fediverse? That’s an interesting take :)

  • noisefree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    They will ban you for comments that are so inert it’s impossible to even know what offended them, it’s ridiculous.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      There’s an unforgiving list of keywords that in the right context could mean something objectionable so they just blanket ban anyone who says the word or phrase.

      • noisefree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        27 days ago

        I got a temporary ban in memes for saying “OpenAI/MS media alliance goes brrrrr” lmao. “Rule 1.” The OP was yet another post about Google’s crappy AI suggestions and I was implying that the mass beating of that dead horse in article after article was because the media is friendlier to OpenAI and MS in the AI space (kinda the same way Apple gets a free pass in the phone space more often than not for shitty practices and taking credit for inventing features that have existed on Android for years prior). But, even in the absence of clarification (since my quip was just observational and not meant to spark conversation lol), I have no clue how that or a lot of the other things they cite “Rule 1” on could possibly be construed as bigoted - there aren’t enough words to work with in the comment I used as an example, just a barely coherent bit of tongue-in-cheekness. Arbitrariness of enforcement is authoritarian af. I messaged a mod to ask what was up since I didn’t realize modlog was a thing at the time and didn’t hear back (which is fine really). It’s more just the finding out when you go to interact and getting a connectivity error and having to sus out what happened that’s annoying and doesn’t feel conducive to a healthy community.

        Getting an automated message in your inbox telling you you’re banned, the length of the ban, and why would be a little more user friendly (though public modlogs are nice) if the goals of the developers are trying to build an inclusive platform. A lot of users aren’t necessarily the type to get a persistent itch when something curious happens, so “figure it out yourself” isn’t a great system. But, if what’s going on over at .ml really is indicative of what the goals of the developers are, it does give me pause about Lemmy as a project and where it will go in the future. As has been mentioned elsewhere, the situation is ripe for the project to be compromised if a dev is compromised and people shouldn’t be sleeping on that. Bad actors injecting seemingly inert exploits into code reviewed by others can happen with any software and fly under the radar, even popular and well trusted FOSS (for reference, see “that time the CIA snuck a backdoor into Notepad++”), so it’s alarming if a group of developers appear to be sympathizers for nationstates that are notoriously privacy hostile.

          • noisefree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            You’re operating under the delusion that they’re moderating in good faith.

            Believe it or not, also Rule 1, straight to the banhaus you go. /s

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      This shit is what made Reddit unusable, up until it literally became unusable when site-wide bans started getting handed out like candy.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I too have received bans for very innocuously based opinions there. I like having civil discussions that expand my scope but they’re not having any of that. Feels bad man.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      I just ended up banning the whole instance from my account so I don’t end up posting there accidentally. If they want an echo chamber, they can have an echo chamber.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      On your Lemmy instance, go to Settings -> Blocks and just block the entire instance. That’s what I did.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I’m honestly fine with that, because outside of their home server, they cannot rely on their mods to protect them from arguments they don’t want to hear.

                • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  Like I said, fine with me as long as it’s on neutral ground and they can’t just have an admin delete some of my arguments because they don’t like them.