• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is so super illegal. Maybe UHC thinks the Trump admin will shield them but under laws as written this is fucking bonkers.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        26 days ago

        It’s funny how we all grow up thinking that law is this immutable set of rules that can’t be broken or bad things happen to you…

        Reality is there’s no rules, there’s just power, and some vague guidelines that might tell you how that’s power’s going to be used. And if it seems like the power won’t be able to use those guidelines for their own benefit, then they’ll get them changed.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yea, I bet there are some lawyers like LegalEagle that are foaming at the mouth to find someone with proper standing.

        This is such an open and shut case - assuming it is actually UHC sending these notices in an official capacity.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      DMCA was entirely created for illegitimate uses though right? It’s been rife with abuse since it started.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      26 days ago

      There are no consequences for deliberate DMCA misuse/abuse. It was designed as a tool to be abused solely by those with deep pockets, so it’s working exactly as intended.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        There are no consequences for mistakenly issuing a notice for a piece of content you own. There are consequences for fraudulently misrepresenting yourself as the content owner.

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      There are no consequences anymore. Musk proved it when he openly bribed politicians on Twitter to try to force a gov shutdown.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Claim DENIED

      Claimant did not take preventative measures, as required under section 48, paragraph 16, item 4 of the policy agreement.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    26 days ago

    And just when it seems Luigi is out of the news here comes the Streisand Effect with a steel chair!

  • nnullzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    26 days ago

    YouTube content creators are dealing with the same bullshit to a degree. Especially on the music side. DCMA and copyright strikes are being weaponized to shut content down someone doesn’t like, not because there’s actually infringement going on. You see that happening now too with comic/comedy commentator channels, e.g. the whole Brendan Schaub bit.

    There’s a lawyer I follow on YT who speaks about this a lot.

    https://youtube.com/@topmusicattorney

  • minnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    26 days ago

    But the disturbing thread running through all these requests is how easy it’s become for copyright trolls to leverage the DMCA to intimidate providers

    I remember this issue being pointed out by the more vocal critics of the dmca when the bill was working its way through Congress. They warned that “remove first, ask questions later” would be abused by corporations in this exact manner with effectively no recourse for people who can’t afford a lawyer for every single time there victimized by a wrongful takedown request.

    And here we are, decades later, and it’s been a problem this whole time.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    26 days ago

    Please let them get royally fucked over copyright laws. That’s not how they work.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    26 days ago

    Even if we gave benefit of doubt, they couldn’t buy the rights to his image until after he died and I doubt he would sign off on the rights while still alive.