My Problems with Mastodon

Even with growing pains accommodating an influx of new users, Lemmy has made it clear that a federated social media site can be nearly as good as the original thing. I joined Lemmy, and it exceeded my expectations for a Reddit alternative run by an independent team.

These expectations were originally pretty low when Mastodon, the popular federated Twitter alternative, was the only federated social media I had experience with. After using Lemmy, Mastodon seems to be missing basic features. I initially believed these were just shortcomings of federated social media.

  1. Likes aren’t counted by users outside your instance, and replies don’t seem to be counted at all (beyond 0, 1, 1+), leading to posts that look like they have way more boosts (retweets) than likes or replies:

    This incentivizes people to just gravitate toward the biggest instance more than people already do. My guess is that self-hosting a mastodon instance would also not be ideal, since the only likes you’ll see are your own.

  2. There’s really only one effective ways to find popular or ‘trending’ posts. There’s the explore tab which has ‘posts’, and ‘tags’ sections.

    The ‘posts’ section shows some trending posts across your instance and all the instances that it’s federated with, this is the one I use it the most.

    The ‘tags’ section is a lot like the trending tab on Twitter, but it’s reserved just for hashtags, which I guess isn’t a huge deal, but it feels like a downgrade. However, I do like the trend line it shows next to each tag!

    The ‘Local’ and ‘Federated’ tabs are a live feed of post from your home instance and all the other instances, respectively. I feel these are pretty useless and definitely don’t warrant their own tabs. Having a local trending tab for seeing popular posts on your instance would be more interesting.

  3. The search bar basically doesn’t work, is this just me???

  4. This one is more minor and more specific to a Twitter alternative, but when looking at a user’s follows, you’ll only see the one’s on your home instance but for some reason this rule doesn’t apply to followers.

From what I’ve heard, a lot of these issues are intentional in order to create a healthier social media experience. Things like less focus on likes, reduces a hivemind mentality, addiction, things like that (I couldn’t find a source for this, if anyone has one confirming or disproving this please lmk).

Why this is a Problem

Mastodon seems to have two goals: To be an example of how a federated alternative to Twitter can work well, and to be a healthier social media experience. It’s not obvious, but I think these goals conflict with each other. A lot of the features that are removed in the pursuit of a healthier social media will be perceived as the shortcomings of federation as a concept.

In my eyes, Mastodon’s one main goal should be proving federated social media as a whole to the public, by being a seamless, familiar, full-featured alternative to Twitter. For me, Lemmy has done that for Reddit, upvotes are counted normally, you can see trending posts locally and globally same with communities, and the search function works! All its shortcomings aren’t design flaws, and I fully expect them to be fixed down the road as it matures.

As annoying as Jack Dorsey is, I have high hopes for BlueSky.

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can see why others might find those features useful, but I am not bothered by any of it. To me, Twitter was a (micro) blogging site, so I treated it as such. I found organizations/creators that I wanted to follow and read my feed in chronological order.

    I don’t care about likes and retweets, because every tweet in my feed was coming from a source I wanted to hear from. Reply count did matter, but mostly to know that there were responses.

    I never cared what was trending because it was never something I cared about.

    I only used search to find specific users (though it is easy enough to find them by Googling or looking for a link on that user’s website) and,.on very rare occasions, I would search for my city or neighborhood name to see if there was a cause to be commotion I was seeing

    I never cared who other users followed or were followed by. Even looking at my own followers was an exercise in who stroking.


    My biggest complaint about Mastodon is that none of the users I would want to follow are on it yet. It is not a big enough issue to keep me on Twitter but there is no reason for me to join Mastodon either (as a lurker and occasional replyer).

  • Steve@compuverse.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mastodon doesn’t have Likes at all.

    The star you’re referring to is Favorite. Those go into your Favorite list. So you can refer back to them more easily.

    • justhach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh god, Ive been using them wrong this whole time?!?!

      I guess I am so used to other social media I had assumed it was a like button.

      • tqgibtngo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Although they differ from Twitter Likes, note that Mastodon Favorites are not private. For an example, I’ll refer to one of your toots:
        https://mastodon.social/@justhach/110696151311920356

        Viewing it in the Mastodon web interface, I see an indication that 2 people marked it as a Favorite. I can then click to see those 2 usernames, listed here:
        https://mastodon.social/@justhach/110696151311920356/favourites

        Such listings are limited though. For example, I’m viewing a toot that you boosted, and I see an indication that it has been marked as a Favorite by 816 users; but when I click to view their names, I see only 40 of them listed.

      • whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, you haven’t. It started out this way, but now basically it’s the “tell the poster you acknowledge/like the post” but also there when you don’t want to boost the post to your timeline. You can still use it this way, but because the community (probably with one of the first twitter exoduses) started using it more like a like on twitter, they gave up and implemented bookmarks (I think might be private and not notify the poster you’ve bookmarked?)

        Ofc, there are also some of the mastodon HOA that will still insist this, but then why do bookmarks exist…?

        Anyway, just in general, you can tell by the up/down ratio and a lot of the comments that are getting upvoted in this thread that are posting things that are either just incorrect or at least misunderstand things how many people in this thread actually use mastodon, so I would take criticism with a grain of salt.

    • Talos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t see it that way. There are separate options to Favourite or Bookmark a post. To me Bookmarking something is so you can refer to it later, although nothing is stopping you using Favourites that way.

      • Steve@compuverse.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Favourite and Bookmark are absolutely different things. They’re two different lists for you to use as you see fit.
        Neither of them is a Like though. I’m not sure that fact is really debatable.

        • Talos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ll have to disagree there. When you Favourite a post, the person that posted it gets a notification about the fact, while if you Bookmark something no notification is sent. In effect you are telling the person that you “Liked” their post.

          Also, looking at the Explore section of Mastodon the following message is shown at the top of the feed:

          These are posts from across the social web that are gaining traction today. Newer posts with more boosts and favorites are ranked higher.

          So those Favourites are used by the algorithm to rank posts. Bookmarks are totally private and only used to save posts for your own use.

          • Steve@compuverse.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Lets try it this way. Would say your favourites things, include everything you like? Do you like some things that aren’t your favorite? Do you keep a list of everything you’ve ever liked? Would it be as big as the list of your favorite things?

            Do you see the difference? It’s a mater of degree that separates them. They are not the same. That’s why they are two different words.

            • planish@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              People will say stuff like “fave before replying” though. And most platforms with a like will be able to make you a list of everything you have liked.

              So I think like maps to the little Mastodon star pretty well, even though it might not be meant to be used that way.

            • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Your getting lost in lingual semantics. It’s just called “favourites” but it’s treated, at face value and at the code level, the same way other sites/systems treat the word “like”. That’s what matters. It could be called “Flibflabs” and still be a “like” replacement.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Favourites get put on a list so you can refer to it later … and notify the poster that you’ve done so as a form of positive feedback.

        Bookmarks get put on a list so you can refer to it later.

        That’s the big difference.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    Calckey/Firefish (forked from the Japanese software Misskey, so I assume that one is similar) is basically Mastodon but cool. It fixes many of your problems. While it’s not yet perfect (same issue with followers from other servers), there seems to be more going on.

    As annoying as Jack Dorsey is, I have high hopes for BlueSky.

    As long as he doesn’t submit that protocol as ActivityPub 2.0 or whatever, it’s not compatible with the wider fediverse, so not interesting.

    • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I only found firefish the other day but 'like Mastodon but cool" is a perfect way to describe it.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      As long as he doesn’t submit that protocol as ActivityPub 2.0 or whatever, it’s not compatible with the wider fediverse, so not interesting.

      If they get their act together and publish a real protocol / standard that a developer can read, implement, and then have a server capable of federating, then activitypub 1.0 can diaf and we can all praise our new activitypub 2.0 overlords.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        He cannot just call something the name of an industry standard but he can submit his to the W3C who then can decide whether to adopt it or not

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago
    1. It actually does appear that Mastodon doesn’t know how many replies there are until it loads them for display. Glitch, a Mastodon fork with some UI enhancements has an option to display an estimate of the number of replies. Lemmy obviously displays an exact comment count while using the same protocol. There may be a performance/efficiency motivation for this.
    2. A trending feature should probably have the option to include federated content, as some instances are very small, even single-user.
    3. I find the stance taken by Mastodon’s developer and many users… I’ll be charitable and say unreasonable. It’s about a dozen lines of code to add a proper search and there are two ways to do it (Postgres text search is easy, Elasticsearch may be better for big servers). Some server admins have implemented this.
    4. I’m seeing that for both follows and followers.

    There are other ActivityPub Twitter-alikes that may meet your needs better, such as Akkoma. Akkoma has reasonable search, can show remote follows and followers, and seems to keep accurate reply counts. It’s not as polished looking though.

    • ShittyKopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      There may be a performance/efficiency motivation for this.

      Lemmy communities work by having a psuedo-user that “boosts” all posts and comments it receives to all it’s subscribers, meaning all instances are aware of all comments (as long as at least one user is subscribed, and barring any defederation). I’m not entirely sure on what the “reply fetching algorithm” of Masto is, but it doesn’t go out of it’s way to fill everything.

  • sure@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh, so that explains why the ratio of favorites/boosts is so low on mastodon. I thought it was just a culture thing, where people rarely left likes on posts.

    Turns out it was just a software quirk.

  • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean, you’re not wrong. The “problems” of Mastodon are features. Avoiding an algorithm to suggest toots was done on purpose. It’s why likes are simply for the author, not really for others. Boost promote toots by increasing exposure.

    Likes are not the same as likes on Twitter, nor should they really matter. The intent of Mastodon is not to promote some toots over others due to popularity which many times just creates feedback loops. It’s why you would see repetitive content on Reddit and if Lemmy gets remotely the same size, it’ll suffer the same way. Algorithms are problematic in that they tend to get abused.

  • ShittyKopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    The ‘Local’ and ‘Federated’ tabs are a live feed of post from your home instance and all the other instances, respectively. I feel these are pretty useless and definitely don’t warrant their own tabs. Having a local trending tab for seeing popular posts on your instance would be more interesting.

    I might agree with you on federated, but the local timeline on smaller or tight knit instances tend to be really nice. I’m on this instance’s Hajkey (slightly customized Firefish fork) and spend most of my time on the local timeline. It’s only when you get to the size of .social, .online and whatnot that it loses it’s usefulness. And that seems to be the direction website boy wants to take Mastodon given he took the local timeline out from the official Mastodon mobile app.

    The search bar basically doesn’t work, is this just me???

    Full text search is an admin setting that can be turned on and off I believe. It (the way Mastodon implements it at least) takes a lot of server resources which is why most instances don’t bother.

    • zaros@zaros.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      When I was using Mastodon, the local timeline was almost exclusively what I was paying attention to. It was a really nice small community of people.

  • semidetached@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve been on and off mastodon since 2019 and I’ve really wanted to like it, however the lack of a usable search kills it for me. I guess when your the main dev and you have half of mastodon following you a usable search isn’t really necessary. Someone did try to work on a way to scrape and make mastodon searchable but they got hounded off mastodon I believe?

    I tried to use hashtags but the ones I followed seemed to have a large number of terminally online/bots posting links making finding anything useful practically useless. In the end I got fed up of the feeling I was shouting into the void. I want to use and like Mastodon but I felt like I was fighting the system.

    I’m just glad Lemmy seems to have taken off it’s not perfect but it’s certainly on the way

  • maegul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    > Mastodon seems to have two goals: To be an example of how a federated alternative to Twitter can work well, and to be a healthier social media experience. It’s not obvious, but I think these goals conflict with each other. A lot of the features that are removed in the pursuit of a healthier social media will be perceived as the shortcomings of federation as a concept.

    Basically this all over.

    IMO, Mastodon is a paradox that the fediverse needs to move on from. It is not an alternative to Twitter, but, its popularity rests on this very perception. And so we have a dominant platform, that most consider to actually just be the whole fediverse, whose dominance is in many ways arbitrary or luck of circumstance. Which is fine … that’s how things happen. But the sooner we move on from Mastodon dominating the fediverse the better.

    The way I’ve put it previously is that Mastodon is an awkward middle ground that actually doesn’t work too well for many people. It’s neither particularly safe/healthy or particularly engaging or interesting. And so many BIPOC avoid it while there are LGBTQ folks who openly consider it problematic and are ready to jump ship whenever necessary, while journalists and anyone who’s looking to form wide networks (without being influencers or doing anything for-profit) don’t see the point. In many ways, it’s the white/western suburbia of social media … and while that’s a nice place to visit or be sometimes, there’s a good reason to not live there or be there all the time, especially when online.

    On top of all that, it’s actually a pretty simple/brutalist take on what social media can be, to the point of being unnecessarily backward. And yet, by the numbers, it is basically the fediverse (like literally ~88% of active users are on mastodon!).

    The fediverse can do better. Will do better, and already has.

    • There’s firefish (and Misskey too, from which it was forked, and Iceshrimp and Hajkey which are forks of firefish)
    • There’s Akkoma
    • Then there’s Lemmy and kbin.
    • ikka@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      And yet, by the numbers, it is basically the fediverse (like literally ~88% of active users are on mastodon!).

      I guess it must not be as bad as you make it out to be then?

          • Wollff@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Of course! How could I miss it. The argument: “User numbers are an indicator of quality”, is not valid, unless in context of the fediverse. Because…

            Wait, I don’t think me, being the dumb asshat I am, understand that: Why? Why do you think user numbers indicate that something “can’t be as bad as you make it out to be” in the fediverse, but not anywhere else?

  • Kronusdark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think this is very much a YMMV situation. I moved from twitter to mastodon and brands aside, all of the interesting people I followed are here. granted, I follow a very developer centric crowd so it might be a bit self-selecting. I am enjoying Mastodon way more than twitter and I get more engagement on average.

    • Luis Norambuena@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m having a similar experience. Almost all developers (mostly Python/Django) I was following on Twitter are on Mastodon and being able to follow hashtags is great. The servers are stable and I kept the very first android client I tried (Tusky).

  • Fez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    So users viewing this post on another instance will see the same exact comments and upvotes?

    • russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, on my instance for example your comment has 10 upvotes and 7 replies - the same counts are reflected on the origin instance lemmy.world.

    • sunbunman@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      My understanding is yes, but only if the instances have federated with each other.

    • Nevoic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s the idea, but in practice since the data exists independently on each server, it takes network time and computational time for them to align. In practice I expect comments to function as you expect, and upvotes to be slightly off depending on which instance you’re viewing from.

      Things get a bit more weird when an instance gets defederated from another instance. My understanding here is that if you have instance A defederate from instance B, but instance B was listening to some of instance A’s communities, that instance B will have an independent replica of that community that doesn’t sync (this happened when beehaw defederated from open registration instances like lemmy.world).

  • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago
    1. This is a feature, not a bug. Clout-chasing is what kills corporate/surveillance social media. Get over fantasy Internet points and start providing and consuming actual content.

    2. I’d like to see “trending” removed entirely from Mastodon. I don’t give a shit what people at large think is important or cool or funny or whatnot. I care what my social circle thinks is important or cool or funny or whatnot. And for that? I’ve got my feed. Get over algorithmically spoon-fed statements of what you should care about and, you know, interact. On social media.

    3. The search bar works, just not in the way any sane person would expect it to work. It’s badly designed, badly named, and badly implemented.

    4. This is an unfortunate side effect of distributed social media. Federation is already a huge bottleneck for the Fediverse. Adding social graph follows to the list of things being transmitted around willy-nilly is a bandwidth killer. Any social media that is truly distributed (read: not BlueSky) will have the same issue.

    • jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago
      1. is the reason many of us were on Twitter to begin with. I never kept to with friends there, but I really liked seeing breaking news, etc. It was useful and functional. Madstodon is not useful in this way, which breaks one of the key features many of us want in a Twitter replacement.

      Sounds like I need to look at this Fish place instead.

      • alizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Big agree, Twitter I previously used to see “what’s happening” in the world outside my little bubble

      • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s me. Besides the ads/promotion/tracking shit pre-elon Twitter was doing pretty much exactly what I want from it. It was mostly for the parasocial relationships not for keeping up with actual friends. I’d get news and announcements straight from the source quickly and even with a verified checkmark to help ensure I wasn’t getting trolled. Now it’s trash.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you wanted spoon-fed content, then yes, Twitter is the place for you! And you know what? It’s still there!

        I left Twitter because of the spoon-fed content and the algorithmic attempts to “engage” me by fostering outrage and am happy that Mastodon thus far does not have this misfeature. If you want that misfeature Twitter is still there. So is BlueSky (eventually). So is Threads. So is Instagram. So is Facebook. There’s an embarrassment of choice for the pabulum crowd. Please don’t bring it here.

      • thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s what makes threads like this so interesting to me. I never got into Twitter(despite many attempts literally since it was first released) but absolutely love Mastodon. And sometimes I read these threads and just think…what?

        But in reality it just comes down to your individual use case and whether the specific thing that Mastodon is actually fits that use case.

        Until this thread, for example, I didn’t know there was such a thing as a trending tab and I didn’t know there was a problem seeing people’s follows because it would never have occurred to me to look.

        I use the advanced interface and, while I do follow people, very very rarely pull up the home feed. My columns are all crafting hashtags and my local feed because I’m on a crafting-focused server.

        If you’re into following topics, Mastodon is a great time. If you’re into following people or you want to to kept up to date with the outside world then I can definitely understand not being a fan.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I tried following #ukraine on Mastodon, but I got spammed by repost bots so it just completely clogged my feed

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      1. Seeing upvotes on posts is literally why you’re using Lemmy right now. Advertising / engagement driven media can exploit our desire to get feedback on what we say but getting feedback on what we say is not a new or novel phenomena, it’s a fundamental part of human nature and why we converse. It’s literally the exact same reason why doing a zoom presentation with cameras on, so that you can read body language, is better than cameras off, where you feel like you’re talking to an empty uncaring void.

      2. If you want to catch up with you family and friends go outside and talk to them or call them, or hell, set up your instance and only allow their posts to come through. The rest of the world users twitter to connect with the Twitterverse not their neighbours.

      3. I see no reason it would be any harder than Lemmy syncing upvotes acros ls thousands and thousands of comments.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago
        1. First, I don’t give a shit at all about the upvote counts (and even less of a shit about the downvote counts) on Lemmy. To the point I have them concealed. Second, so you’re saying a different piece of software with different goals does things differently? WOW WHAT AN OBSERVATION! YOU SHOULD GO APPLY FOR A NOBEL PRIZE, GOOD SIR!

        2. Please point to where I said “family”? (Hint: this is not possible.)

        3. You see no reason, ergo there is no reason, Q.E.D. You, sir, are also a consummate logician.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago
          1. It’s a different piece of software with the same user facing goals, fostering online discussion in community run communities centered around different topics.

          2. Please look up what a semantic argument is, and then realize you’re missing the point.

          3. Sooooo…

          • You claimed something was impossible,

          • I pointed to an instance of it being possible that we’re using right now

          • you mocked me for being too logical? Ok.

    • cstine@lemmy.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Agree with this comment: Firefish is much better than the current state of Mastodon, especially since all the complaints you have are basically being wont-fixed by the current dev team.

      • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is anyone actually on Firefish though? The issue with these platforms is that they don’t really become usable until they have a decent userbase.

        • AtaKe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Firefish user here. While I do agree with the statement, I’d like to add that Firefish integrated really well in “twitter-verse”. You can see post from Mastodon, Misskey, Akkoma/Pleroma and other platforms. So the small userbase isn’t much of a problem.

          I, personally, find Misskey/Firefish a much better alternative to Twitter than mastodon. It has everything you’d expect: Nice and clean UI, “quoted retweets” ability, working search functionality, post reactions and much more.

          However you still need to go to an accounts instance to see its subscriptions/subscribes. But I guess it will be fixed in future

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Is anyone actually on Firefish though?

          I’m on Firefish (still getting used to the name) - I signed up Mastodon initially but I couldn’t get into it. Being on Lemmy helped me get my head around the Fediverse but, after I signed up to Calckey, I haven’t gone back to Mastodon. Finding enough content is tricky but all the various extra features (like Antenna) really help.

        • kglitch@kglitch.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Firefish is federated so you’re not limited to content and people on Firefish. You can see Mastodon (and Akkoma, and Lemmy, etc etc) content inside Firefish.

  • randint@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I believe the 0, 1, 1+ reply counts is a setting available to your instance admins. Mine actually does count.