• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 12th, 2024

help-circle














  • I think we need to make laws pertaining to the use and usage of the term by businesses. There is nothing intelligent about language models. Most of what AI is being used for in businesses is more “Automated Instructions” than anything intelligent.

    Laws need to dictate that companies MUST have reasonable ability to get to a human representative and that they are legally responsible for their responses.

    It’s fine to set up automated systems to assist people within companies, as the majority of issues people have can be solved through automated processes.

    User: “I need access to this network share”

    LLM: Okay submit this form: Link to network share access request form.

    LLM: Can I further assist?

    User submits form specifying what the network path location, radio buttons for read/ read, write permissions, and reason for needing access.

    Form sends approve/deny button to owner of that specific network share in an email.

    Approver clicks approve, and the user is added to the active directory group required, and receives an email back stating they have been added and they should log out and log back in so their active directory groups update group policies.

    Time taken by users: 5 minutes Many companies have so many requests coming in that stuff like this often doesn’t get to the approving parties and completed for weeks.

    But if you set up an LLM inside your company non external facing that locates forms and processes but cannot access user data or permissions it can take the workload of managing 60,000 users down by a significant amount.

    (I’m sure there are a million other uses that could be legitimate, but that’s just a quick one off the top of my head)




  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlI did that!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Find me a case of another person being charged with purchasing a gun while being addicted to a drug. Or better yet tens of thousands. You might find someone arrested for attempting to buy a gun while on drugs, but none that reviewed their past logs and tried to find out they were possibly addicted at the time of a purchase of a gun.

    It was an investigation that I’ve never seen anywhere before. Any normal situation and a judge would have dismissed it completely as the person was not on drugs at the time of the charge, nor harmed/threatened anyone with the gun

    Note: several judges stated such laws were unconstitutional during the years of the investigation, so any Republican supporting it must admit that States have the right to restrict any and all gun purchases for any and all reasons as the constitution states no such laws pertaining to addiction over lap and gun purchases… Or the law cannot support that case

    Sidebar: whatever he did with taxes if it was unlawful and others do get charged with it, sure he should be charged



  • Didn’t they look through records to figure out he may have been an addict around the time he bought a gun and that’s what he got charged for?

    A law restricting access to gun purchases based on legislation not in the constitution. Thereby … exactly what judges have been trying to rule unconstitutional. So if the law is legitimate… Then states have full right to restrict gun purchases by any of their wants.

    It’s all hypocritical shit.