Read the article folks. Amazon is claiming they don’t meet the definition in Europe, where there are other online retailers with more sales in those countries that are not flagged as ‘Very Large Online Platforms’. Amazon is simply claiming that them getting that designation and other online retailers of the same or larger sizes are not is unfair and Amazon shouldn’t receive that tag in those countries.
If everyone does it, you’re likely to stop at the first place that gives you a price deemed reasonable instead of doing the extra annoying work of shopping around. Stops people from just picking the cheapest option.
Shows how much planning he does to change his mind in two hours flat.
Wait, so skimming through the brief, they argue that the law suits had no standing, were not valid for even consideration, but still put an injunction on the act anyway? What the fuck, how is that not blatant political bias?
I think you could argue downloading movies from the internet is the only true mistake, but again internet speeds weren’t great then, Redbox was doing well, and even YouTube was still young. The iPhone complaints are about first gen, and wii was great , but imo was a bit over hyped.
For a “calm your asses down 2008 will not be known as the Golden year of computing” the takes are all reasonable.
DELETE FROM person automatically ran update site_aggregates for me, very very slowly at that.
No. It’s strictly worse than Windows 10.
Yeah, I think there is a fair argument that going with the cheapest option will lead to a worse outcome for you, but I do think there is a little bit of game theory involved here.