Non-Jewish Arabs in the basic laws of Israel do not have rights to self determination. Its a fucking apartheid state. Its like saying millions of native Africans lived in South Africa. These people only had a reason to attack because they live in an open air prison that mirrors a Warsaw ghetto with complete siege from their neighbor. A lot of the things they did was retaliation and a deep brewing anger. What the fuck were they supposed to do? March peacefully? Israel shot them by the thousands in 2018 when they tried to. where is your humanity?

You are ridiculous. First you spread misinformation about the ICJ ruling, bending what the ruling meant. Now you are trying to use a ‘no, you’ card to bend my words and pretend that there hasn’t been a racist campaign against Palestinians and Arabs for decades.

There were likely rapes that occurred on October 7th, and there have been rapes of Israeli detained Palestinian hostages as well. How can you not see that one is now being used as a racial justification for genocide while the other is ignored.

What’s controversial is the depiction of Palestinians as rapists and outlining a systemic, racial, or cultural issue of rape within Arab populations, then pointing to the few instances it does occur as proof for a racist point of view.

Both parties are guilty of rape and sexual assault. None of that is okay. However only one is being racially profiled as having an innate proclivity for rape.

That isn’t what I said. If you cut the middleman, you are informed nearly immediately. You can tell whether your government’s actions align with their words immediately. In many instances we learned of the lies before they were even told. That’s why you currently have a nation of cynics.

where can I buy your crystal ball

Because during Vietnam people got the news from the media. The middleman is cut, we know immediately if this is just talk or real action.

Absolutely. They will be late, if ever, to report the cause of death.

JPost’s editorial team has an official stance that anti-zionism is anti-semitism. so this is no surprise.

Incredible the NYT talks about the major concessions that Israel has made with no mention of the obviously ludicrous terms that Israel has offered. Israel has made it clear the goal is a complete displacement and settlement of Gaza.

https://youtu.be/YkB8-jMmIGs

That is not what the ICJ ruling means. They do not have the power to convict nations or individuals of genocide. It was simply a preliminary hearing to see if a full trial is warranted. You’re misrepresenting the courts decision either ignorantly or maliciously.

.

Your expert in the article has no idea what that is a picture of, even if it is not AI generated. I don’t trust Israel, who has a literal propaganda division to tell me. If they want they can submit evidence to a independent third party, which of course they will not.

Now please give me an independent, verified source of these 40 babies burned or decapitated. Which you ignored.

Citation needed. Netanyahu claimed 40 Israeli infants were burned alive and or beheaded and then shared an AI generated image of a burned infant.

https://theintercept.com/2023/12/14/israel-biden-beheaded-babies-false/

Seems like 70 years is a long time to keep a group of people under a crushing grip of apartheid. Perhaps Palestinians watching their family members bulldozed, tortured, bombed, strapped to tanks would evoke something in people?

Also are you seriously talking about the AI infant propaganda that the White House had to walk back on after no evidence was presented? Why not play devils advocate for the people that have now lost over 11K children?

Are you suggesting Palestinians are trying to eradicate all Jews when they are undergoing an actual genocide from Israel?

It’s almost like both the Warsaw and Gaza uprisings were a reaction to occupation and murder.

If you’re going to play devil’s advocate at least know the facts. There WERE Jewish militant groups that resisted the Nazis. The oppressed are justified to fight back.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Ghetto_Uprising

Unfortunately, this is the title the official editorial board chose. To be abundantly clear, a cease fire is the only moral position.

I wanted to open people’s eyes to the fact that ‘factual’ and ‘audited’ papers often peddle misinformation.

Another example:

https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2023/11/10/how-the-term-genocide-is-misused-in-the-israel-hamas-war

The economist explains that genocide is a misused term in this genocide. Not only is that factually untrue, Israel has unequivocally fit the bill for all four factors that constitute a genocide, but it has been solidified in the ICJ that Israel may be perpetrating a genocide and that a formal genocide hearing will take place. The economist’s official stance was to propagate misinformation, yet it is seen as ‘HIGH’ for factual reporting.

I post this not because I support this headline, on the contrary this is abhorrent and morally bankrupt. Instead I’d like to draw your attention to a disturbing trend I’ve noticed recently of posting ‘mediabiasfactcheck’ to build a standing around a certain paper.

Mediafactcheckbias is not a valid way of establishing credibility nor does it adequately portray the level of bias.

See here:

VS

How can one take the fact check seriously when this should invalidate any legitimacy the WSJ has? They are not only biased but are purposely questioning the death toll of Gaza since it comes from Hamas medical officials, which has been independently verified for decades. They are intentionally conflating the militant group with the ministry of Gaza in an attempt to dismiss the scale of this atrocity.

Please stop posting media bias fact check and please stop taking them seriously.