• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Not op, no idea either. Best I can make of it is some sort of surrealist fifth level multi layered reference to several memes at once? The only one I know is the trolley problem one

    • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      If we are now considering philosophical intellectual exercises to be memes then this description is accurate.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      6 months ago

      The grand hilbert hotel is a metaphor about infinity. If a hotel has an infinite number of rooms, it will have enough room for him. If every room is full, they can all still move up by one room number. Infinity means you can always shift everyone up by 1 room number.

      The ship of theseus is a philosophical question about whether it’s still the same ship after having every board and nail in it replaced over centuries of repairs gradually replacing all of its parts.

      Asking if Sisyphus is happy is a reference to a famous Albert Camus (French absurdity philosopher) quote “One must imagine Sisyphus happy”

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Very interesting stuff, thank you!

        Albeit the post seems a bit esoteric for lemmyshitpost without the extra context

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love how you call them memes. These are things philosophers talked about long before the word meme had its modern day meaning, even before it was coined in the first place. But in a way, yes, they are all memes

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, I also acknowledged them as philosophical dilemmas in another comment, but I suppose it is my own fault for not clarifying that in the first.