Shardikprime@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agoTake a gander at thislemmy.worldimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down148
arrow-up1580arrow-down1imageTake a gander at thislemmy.worldShardikprime@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-squareSomeGuy69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down8·6 months agoBecause women on average live longer. Strange isn’t it.
minus-squaresteuls@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·6 months agoWhy would that mean they get to retire earlier then?
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 months agoYeah, this person’s logic makes no sense. This is a solid argument for men retiring earlier. Personally, I’d say it’s probably best if it’s just the same for everyone.
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoMaybe opposite? Maybe women live lomger because they retire earlier?
minus-squareFartsWithAnAccent@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·6 months agoNo because women also live longer in countries that do not do this.
Because women on average live longer. Strange isn’t it.
Why would that mean they get to retire earlier then?
Yeah, this person’s logic makes no sense. This is a solid argument for men retiring earlier.
Personally, I’d say it’s probably best if it’s just the same for everyone.
Maybe opposite? Maybe women live lomger because they retire earlier?
No because women also live longer in countries that do not do this.