• SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I used to feel this way but ultimately, what happened was tragic, even if it happened years prior. He expressed it publicly and some folks probably felt “seen” at the time. That’s a good thing. Talking about/hearing stories of trauma and loss and grief can be very empowering for folks who have experienced their own.

    Like don’t get me wrong: yes he was (is?) all those things you described. No he was not a model messenger for this story. But that was a serious loss and I think at some point folks need to recognize that we’re all human and maybe we shouldn’t attack someone working through the loss of their child. Even if we feel they don’t deserve to express themselves that way.

    Maybe I’m missing elements of the story but I guess I’ve just never been able to square why it needed to be this ruthlessly mocked. It’s been like 15 years.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I see your point and don’t entirely disagree, I’ll just its hard to feel bad about somebody suffering the consequences of their own actions (not the miscarriage obviously, but the reaction to it).

      You don’t really get to complain about feeling alone when you’re the one that burned all the bridges that lead to your house, imo.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Man, at this point some sociology student could probably write a dissertation just on the cultural context of this comic alone. Both the stuff you’re talking about regarding de-stigmatizing talking about trauma (and miscarriage in particular), and the way the comic itself has been meme-ified and distilled down to representations as abstract as “.:|:;