The linked post shows how most non-tech people’s understanding of email is very very different from most of the people here.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    In my experience, the majority of people doesn’t have the slightest clue how mail works. Somehow you type it in and provide it with an address into one of the three indistinguishable fields that are titled “To”, " CC", “BCC”. And by some black magic it either appears on the screen of the other person. Or it doesn’t. That’s about the amount of knowledge.

    So comparing something to this is kind of meaningless.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yup, and people younger than a certain age think email is as archaic as the pony express.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        As a younger tech person, I definitely don’t get a lot about email. It’s old and weird and arcane and half it’s features that match newer services seem to be built on top of hacks that are enforced through convention alone that will break if I decide I like to format my titles a little differently. Third party clients work, but the main providers, Gmail outlook use some proprietary api to make sure their own works well while everyone else gets stuck with shitty imap. There’s endless little incompatibilities. It all just feels like delerict tower held together with miles of duct tape. Oh and I still haven’t found a good answer to why calendars are so tied up with email.