The linked post shows how most non-tech people’s understanding of email is very very different from most of the people here.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    I don’t think it matters. the specific ways in which email services work or are used are not what the analogy is supposed to explain.

    it’s supposed to explain how two people who log in to different lemmy instances is different from logging into Facebook and MySpace, or Twitter and Threads.

    "how does it work? aren’t they different sites?’

    “you know how you can have a gmail and someone else can use an outlook email but you can still send emails to each other”

    done. even 70 year olds would get it. problem solved. easy, approachable analogy.

    • kryllic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      Exactly this. The second you utter the word “federation” you can see people’s eyes glaze over in real time. The email explainer is good but it really needs to be a short sentence and that’s it

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    In my experience, the majority of people doesn’t have the slightest clue how mail works. Somehow you type it in and provide it with an address into one of the three indistinguishable fields that are titled “To”, " CC", “BCC”. And by some black magic it either appears on the screen of the other person. Or it doesn’t. That’s about the amount of knowledge.

    So comparing something to this is kind of meaningless.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yup, and people younger than a certain age think email is as archaic as the pony express.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        As a younger tech person, I definitely don’t get a lot about email. It’s old and weird and arcane and half it’s features that match newer services seem to be built on top of hacks that are enforced through convention alone that will break if I decide I like to format my titles a little differently. Third party clients work, but the main providers, Gmail outlook use some proprietary api to make sure their own works well while everyone else gets stuck with shitty imap. There’s endless little incompatibilities. It all just feels like delerict tower held together with miles of duct tape. Oh and I still haven’t found a good answer to why calendars are so tied up with email.

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Personally I disagree with the statement, first off, I don’t see an alternative explanation offered. the point is an easy analogy to give them rough concepts. looking at the problems listed in the OP.

    Gmail users believe the only ways to access a Gmail account are through the official web client at mail.google.com, and the official Gmail app for iOS and Android.

    First off there… so the web client off the bat… what’s the problem there, that we aren’t burrying them with “oh if you like you can use alexandrite, or one of 30 other web clients, and then tell it the instance”. The point is we’re trying to reach out to the non tech savy. If their assumption gets them to something that works, then there isn’t a problem, just as not knowing that they can install an e-mail client to check their gmail, isn’t stopping them from using gmail.

    Now the andriod/ios clients, that is the one drawback, you do have to tell them the name of one of the apps, and tell them to pick the website they made their account on from the dropdown. It’s not a huge deal but it is an extra step. If the goal is to reach out to the non tech savy though, the goal has to be to minimize the steps as much as we can.

    Then it goes on to say people are picking instances based on moderation politics etc… Lets face it regular people don’t… and they don’t care. Really like 2% of people actually hit points where moderation is a visible thing to them. usually because they are on the edge of a political side.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    "you know how you can’t talk to someone on Twitter.com from facebook.com? But you can email from your @gmail.com to someone with an @yahoo.com address?

    That’s the difference, federated social media is like email in this way."

    I’m mostly sure even my elderly parents understood it when I said it…

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      till they throw you the curveball that they can indeed talk to someone on twitter from facebook.

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      And you know how, when you subscribe to a mailing list, you will only receive new mail sent to the list if your server happens to “federate” with the sender’s server?

      Oh wait, that’s not how e-mail works.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    I don’t expect non-tech people to ever come to or care about this place, or Mastodon.

    Part of social media is predation. There is a draw to Facebook, even if it is the endless sea of bullshit emanating through it, the marketing of products and echo chambers.

    people would love to be entertained by our intellectual discussions!

    They watch Adam Sandler movies, lad. We’ve already lost.

    It’s a draw. We have no draw, other than being DIY NPR (now with 5% more tankies). It’s a draw, but it won’t draw them. It’s not what they care about.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    If you want to get non-techy users, then there is absolutely no need to even use the word fediverse or to try to explain what any of this means. If you want to help a friend get onboard, just send them a link to sign up on the same server that you use, or a nice general purpose server. That’s it. They sign up, they use it, and THEN they can start to learn about fediverse shit if they care to.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yes. You can use it without understanding how it works behind the scenes. At some point, they’ll run into a situation where it is helpful to learn some part of how the fediverse works and then they can ask about it, generating more content and interaction along the way

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Don’t explain anything, there’s literally no point. Why are nerds so insistent that people understand technology?

    Just tell people to make an account on any instance, whichever one you like best, and let them experience federation. Even if they never really understand what is happening they can still use the service. It’s not like any of them understand how email works, and yet they all use email. Understanding is worthless. Stop being nerds.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      This is how you get people whining about there being 8 different “Politics” groups, and insisting they should be allowed to erase the identity of the hosting website.

      The patchwork nature of the fediverse is baked into the technology. If people don’t at least have a basic model for how it behaves, then they’re just going to get pissed off at it and leave.

      Ypu don’t need to know how an internal combustion engine works to drive, but you have to understand how driving works, both from the perspective of operating a car, and from that of the conventions of the road.

      “Just find a pretty car and hop behind the wheel” is bad advice for everyone.

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Why are nerds so insistent that people understand technology?

      Because technology forms the basis of the online environments we inhabit, and gives us the tools to tell how, say, our data is stored and processed.

      If you’re going to get in the water, it’s probably a good skill to be able to swim. If you’re going to drive a car and don’t have the faintest idea how the engine works, you’ll be at the mercy of manufacturers and mechanics.

      The solution to your issue is not that everybody should conform to the lowest common denominator of technology literacy, but that the general internet user should get a fucking idea of the environment they navigate.

      Stop being nerds

      Never.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        Nerds don’t just want to teach people to swim. They want to teach them about hydrogen bonds and the mineral contents of the water, the processes of water treatment, and the technical requirements for a functional pool.

        Nerds don’t just want to teach people to drive. They want to teach them about the engine, the drive train, the underlying transportation infrastructure, and how to change their own oil and tires.

        If you want people to swim or drive or use the fediverse you skip all that shit. Normal people do not care.

        Stop being nerds.

        • deafboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Nerds don’t just want to teach people to swim. They want to teach them about hydrogen bonds and the mineral contents of the water, the processes of water treatment, and the technical requirements for a functional pool.

          And I think that’s beautiful. There is nothing like watching someone explain something they’re passionate about.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            There’s something wrong with hurting other people’s ability to access the fediverse with insufferable nerd explanations that have nothing to do with posting.

            • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              “hurting”? someone yapping about the fediverse is a minor inconvenience at worst. A TON of people that are on Lemmy don’t know how it works, or even care about how it works, and that’s perfectly OK. Nothing wrong with going on !cat@lemmy.world and upvoting the cute cat pictures.

        • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Nerds don’t just want to teach people to drive. They want to teach them about the engine, the drive train, the underlying transportation infrastructure, and how to change their own oil and tires.

          Maybe if more people knew how combustion worked and where the gasoline they burn comes from we wouldn’t have as much global warming denialism.

          Similarly, if people knew how their posts were served though Facebook, what server costs are, and what their revenue model was, it wouldn’t come as such a surprise to them that their privacy was being violated.

          But I think you’re right though. I’ve given up on trying to convince the general public of literally anything, at least in the US where it’s clear the cult of ignorance has soundly won. How can I tell someone that it’s better to use an electric car if they’re not willing to understand the carbon cycle? How can I tell someone it’s better to be vaccinated if they’re not willing to understand herd immunity? How can I tell someone that federated social media is better if they’re unwilling to understand what federation even is?

        • haverholm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Well, apparently you consider basic maintenance like changing tires superfluous to driving. Says all I need to know about your mindset on the other subjects.

          Stop being nerds helplessly unskilled

          FTFY

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            The majority of people pay other people to do that stuff. Normal people don’t care about your nerd shit.

            I change my oil, oil filter, tires, battery, wipers, all that shit. It doesn’t fucking matter though, it’s all superfluous.

            Stop. Being. Nerds. Just let people be basic, stop insisting that they know everything before they’re allowed to drive.

            • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              Those other people are nerds too, now you’re gonna tell them to stop being nerds ? Why should incompetent people be rewarded ?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                20 days ago

                Rewarded?

                This is about what is best for getting more people in into the fediverse. I’m telling people to stop being nerds and chasing normies away.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Don’t explain anything, there’s literally no point. Why are nerds so insistent that people understand technology?

      All people understand Ohm’s law now. It took only 150 years of explaining.

      • Droechai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I promise you that if you collect 10 random people and ask them what Ohms law is, at most you get 5 that knows it’s something about electricity. You are lucky if you have one that knows it.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          It’s taught in every school… At least in Europe.

          • Russ@bitforged.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            I can only speak for myself here but… A lot of things are taught in school. Most of them weren’t something that I use everyday and thus have forgotten about it (some more than others, of course).

            Ohm’s Law would’ve been taught to me sometime during highschool (as the other commenter mentioned, I can tell you it relates to electricity but without looking it up I couldn’t tell you the actual principle behind it) - I graduated from highschool 10 years ago, and have not had a reason to “flex” that memory ever since then.

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      as soon as you say “make an account” their eyes will glaze over. if not, as soon as they hear “instance” their eyes glaze over. if not, as soon as they hear “whichever one you like best” their eyes will glaze over.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Sorry, you misread what I said 😅

        You, the recommender, are the one picking the instance. Whichever one you like best! Don’t bother telling them anything about instances, that’s a waste of time. Just say “go to lemmy.world and post” and don’t bother explaining anything else.

            • asudox@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              no, I migrated away from LW a few months ago. I am currently on discuss.tchncs.de

              I think you confused my current account with the inactive one on LW that I only use for moderating in asklemmy sometimes.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                Oops, embarrassing. 😅

                I have not been convinced lemmy.world being the largest instance is actually a bad thing. It’s bad for federation, I suppose, but they’re all Redditeurs and I appreciate having a containment zone for them.

                • asudox@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 days ago

                  I have not been convinced lemmy.world being the largest instance is actually a bad thing. It’s bad for federation, I suppose, but they’re all Redditeurs and I appreciate having a containment zone for them.

                  Most people here are from reddit or other centralized and enshittified platforms such as Twitter.

                  LW got recommended often and it created a snowballing effect, which is why it became the biggest lemmy instance. Unfortunately people keep doing it and LW admins refuse to close down their registrations temporarily to allow other instances to get some traffic as well. That’s why some people (like me) advise people (like you) to stop recommending LW over other instances.

                  And LW is not a “containment” zone for former redditors.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      So Cars are designed & built by nerds, so are you gonna stop driving cars ? Imagine telling people that you shouldn’t bother trying to learn

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        I’m telling people that it’s okay to be a normie.

        And it is.

        Car nerds can be car nerds to support the normies who can only drive.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      People have been using email since they were five and all modern lives depend on it. If they don’t understand federation they will just be confused why they can’t see the content and leave. “I didn’t understand it and it didn’t work” is one of the more commons reasons I’ve seen on Reddit for failing lemmy

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Doesn’t it default to All? Or at least Local? Shouldn’t they just see a feed of everything if they go to the main page?

        The experience is almost exactly the same as Reddit if you don’t worry about federation or technicalities.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            But they should still see content, even if they don’t understand anything.

            The only way they won’t is if the admins decided users shouldn’t see anything without first subscribing to something, which is a terrible way to ease people in to the service. There needs to be a default feed so normies can use it too!

            • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Unless an instance enrolls in Lemmy-federate, the default behavior is that a user, even on the /all view, will only see local communities, and outside communities that another local user has sought out and subscribed to.

              If a newbie joins a small instance and doesn’t know how to seek out communities that interest them with lemmyverse.net, they would likely have a very small range of content in their feed.

              Lemmy-federate helps by auto subscribing an instance to participating communities, seeding a wide range of content immediately.

              A large instance would offer a good experience either way, but would encourage centralization without Lemmy-federate existing.

  • joel_feila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    I didn’t pick my email my employer did. Other then work ionly use email for account verification, password reset and trqcking shipping. No really i have only sent a dozen or so emails not related to work.

    One way to help the feediverse is to drop federation. No one uses that word no one knows what it emans. At best they will be “so its like Star trek”.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Lol, I saw “drop federation” and thought you meant the concept itself, not just the word. “Well that doesn’t make any sense” I thought. Got it now.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    They all complain about “Muh Open source UI bad” Ok then what is considered a good UI/UX according to you lot (Not you lot in particular I’m not trying to start any beef here)

    & how does one decide that particular UI is User-Friendly ?

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      A UI can be measured in a bunch of different ways, most of which should be measured and balanced against each other.

      I recommend this video essay, where a UX professional (formerly at Microsoft) took over the UX for the FOSS music composing app Musescore and shares a lot of the lessons learned along the way: https://youtu.be/Qct6LKbneKQ

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      a user friendly user interface is one that the user is already familiar with. It is subjective, determined by the user, and will vary from user to user.

      Think about the placement of face buttons for an xbox controller vs a ninttendo switch controller, specifically A and B. The function of menu accept is always on a, and menu back is always on b, but the physical placement of those buttons are opposite on the competing platform. Now think about a playstation controller, and where it puts menu accept and menu back. The glyphs are different, but a nintendo player will find it intuitive while the xbox player will be confused.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      One button to expand pictures similar to RES would be a big improvement

      Built-in keyword filters are another one

      And of course, multi-communities

  • Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    I really think there is no problem here. There is one side that screeches, “We need more people in Lemmy! Lemmy is too obscure and hard to use! We need better UX and less techno-babble when people are trying to sign on!” We also have the opposite side saying, “Fuck the normies! I want my federated server @tek.know.kult for the most austere obscurantists only!”

    Let’s be real, guys. If your federated server is weird and obscure, the normals are not going to really encounter it, and they’re not that into all the federation beef. They want to go to lemmy-website.com, put in a username and password, and fuck off to look at funny memes and rage at news stories.

    I would say I am at least on the right side of the bell curve when it comes to tech literacy, maybe even the top quartile, and I only sort of understand how the Fediverse works, and no offense guys, I don’t really care that much. I looked at Reddit for the funny memes and to rage at news stories, and when they took my favorite app away (Sync for Reddit), I couldn’t be fucked to get advert-aids on the official app, so I jumped ship. Lemmy is just a bit less engaging, just a bit less addictive, and frankly I’m perfectly happy with that. Huzzah for having a bit more of a doomscroll-life balance.

    People will come along with FOSS as well as CS options for joining the Fediverse, things like Threads and Voyager and BlueSky, and the culture of Lemmy will shift likewise. The great news is that with Federation, it will be easy to create islands of autists and weirdos to keep their purity cults as funny as they want them to be, and I think that’s beautiful.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    I honestly think it stills explains it pretty well. Most casual users will not download a specific client and will be fine with the whole idea of an instance being tied to its user interface. It still explains pretty well that it doesn’t largely matter what instance you sign up for and that any instance can talk to (mostly) any other instance, just like with email.

    So yea, I still think it’s a good analogy. It’s not perfect but yea, that’s to be expected from an analogy.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I’m pretty tech minded and I have no idea what the hell any of y’all mean when you say it’s like email because I don’t know the technical details of how email works. I just know how it’s used.

      You think non-tech people are gonna understand that? They’re just gonna assume it is email, in the way it is used; not how the shit works under the hood.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        You think non-tech people are gonna understand that?

        Yes becase they’re not looking to understand the protocol behind federarion anymore then you dowbt understand the protocol behind email, so they will grok better then you how it works bybusibg the email allegory, sending from gmail to outlook works for them.

        I also use the phone network as another allegory if their eyes do glaze over, i can be with one phone company and phone somone on another companies plan. They have little idead of the prorogation of radiowaves etc that makes that all work.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        When I make the analogy, I just mean the fact that a Gmail account can send emails to a Yahoo account or any other email provider. In the same way, a Feddit.dk account can talk to a yiffit.net account. There is not a single company controlling email and there is not a single company controlling the fediverse. That’s really all there is to the analogy.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’m really disappointed with Lemmy’s idea of federation: all it is is a bunch of servers mirroring one another, but the user accounts are server-bound. No jumping instance and taking your identity seamlessly with you.

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      This is exactly like email though.

      You have a gmail account that is tied to google. You have to login to gmail to access your email but you can email anyone in the world. Some people use different providers so they have different email addresses.

      If you want to change providers there is no easy way to do it. You can use imapsync or export to pst and import to new provider and so on, or maybe your new provider gives you tools for importing mail from your old mailbox but it’s not a feature of email protocol(s) to do this.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      This isn’t really Lemmy’s idea of federation, it’s just ActivityPub, the underlying protocol. Having a mechanism for jumping servers is unfortunately quite complicated and it isn’t clear how it should be done or if it is even possible.

      Lemmy does allow you to export and import your settings though, so you can kinda do it but you lose your history.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          The problem as I understand it is basically that user IDs in ActivityPub are intrinsically tied to the domain on which the user registered, so you can’t really move a user from one domain to another.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              Yes exactly - those URLs contain the domain name, so you can’t change servers for a user as their ID is tied to the domain.

                • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Well no they can’t, because that’s not part of ActivityPub. In fact ActivityPub mandates HTTP URLs. Of course, any extension can choose to change that, but since nobody is actually supporting magnet links, it’s not relevant.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        AFAIK the Nostr protocsal sorta let’s you hop around, but it’s full to the brimwith cryptobros, and I’m still not sure how moderation works there.

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Why do CryptoBros live rent-free in your head ? One of Lemmy’s donation methods links to a Cryptocurrency wallet So are you gonna leave Lemmy ?

          They’re annoying yes, but can be ignored

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Yea moderation becomes a big problem once you can’t actually block people. I don’t like that Nostr describes itself as censorship resistent or even censorship free, that’s not a good quality.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            I’m not very familiar with Nostr, but knowing other distributed protocols, you can just hide messages from selected users in client.

            censorship resistent or even censorship free, that’s not a good quality.

            Also, wtf did I read?

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Censorship-free implies that moderation is impossible. If you don’t have moderation, your social media will turn into a Nazi bar.

              you can just hide messages from selected users in client

              That’s not good enough. First of all, users don’t want to have to block people before having a good experience. Users don’t want to deal with moderation themselves, but they also don’t want mean people, harassment and nazis. It’s not easy to recruit moderators for online forums, not a lot of people want to deal with that stuff.

              But secondly, client-level blocking is not effective. It does not stop those bad users from continuing their bad behavior. In the case of Lemmy, it also doesn’t stop their votes from still affecting your feed.

              So yes, censorship-free platforms are not good because censorship-free means moderation-free, and users don’t want that.

              • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 days ago

                If you don’t have moderation, your social media will turn into a Nazi bar.

                Worse, it will immediately devolve into a CP haven. The dark web is dark for a reason.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                I think you (and the Nostr people as well) are just muddling terms here. Censorship is about an external 3rd party (usually the Government) preventing you from seeing things you are potentially interested in, not (as in the case of Lemmy) your service provider and their trusted moderators helping you curate your social media experience. If you are unhappy with the moderation you can easily switch to another instance and use other communities.

                • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  I mean I don’t disagree, but that’s clearly not what Nostr means when they say censorship resistent, cause by that logic, Gmail and Facebook are as censorship resistent as Nostr is.

                  I don’t think there really is a great difference either. Censorship and moderation are just two perspectives on the same thing. One has bad connotations, the other generally good connotations.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                First of all, users don’t want to have to block people before having a good experience.

                In general conversation in distributed protocols is opt-in, not opt-out. If you see something you don’t like in Briar/Tox/Jami, then it is only because you actively seek it.

                • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  Okay, but that is not how the fediverse/Lemmy works at all and I don’t think Nostr works that way either. You can easily see content that you did not explicity ask for (i.e. comments/posts from any user) and I don’t think Nostr is different in this aspect (though I could be wrong).

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    I now after many years of living understand most people don’t care or even want to understand how anything works. It completely baffles me.

    Everyone I know says I’m smart but nah, I was literally in special Ed classes in school. I’m proven slower than the rest, but I am just curious and want to understand how things work which no one else does. It blows my mind how uninterested people are in the things they use everyday

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      You might be slower than the rest, but still smarter than them. Hare and turtoise kinda situation. Nothing wrong with being a slow learner, the willingness to learn is where it’s at.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I am just curious and want to understand how things work which no one else does.

      It depends on how interested you are in a subject. Everything is interesting, but you may not find everything equally interesting, nor do you have time to know everything there is to know about everything.

      For instance, if I fly somewhere, I have a general idea of how wings create lift. But if you try to explain it to me in detail, I’ll tell you to piss off because all I really want to do is travel from A to B.

      But I know plenty about other subjects that I’m really into, that I could bore you to tears with and you’d end up punching me in the face if I tried to explain them to you.

      It’s not okay to not know anything about something. But it’s okay to know enough.

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        That’s fine but when people use technology every day, their phones, computers, ect… and not know what a web browser is that’s a whole different level of ignorance. Not just computing tho also cars. I barely know much about cars but I understand the idea of an engine, like you said it’s okay to know enough. If something breaks on my car I look it up on YouTube and learn a little more slowly. Some people tho will drive a car everyday for their entire life and not understand what a piston even is.