moral_quandary@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 month agotrashNSFWmessage-square478fedilinkarrow-up1820arrow-down177
arrow-up1743arrow-down1message-squaretrashNSFWmoral_quandary@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 month agomessage-square478fedilink
minus-squarebluGill@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month agoRate is just one data point. I’m back again to asking for in depth analysis. Do people who use UHC submit more bogus claims than those who use other insurance for example? There are many more important questions that need to be asked.
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoHoly moly, are you really this much of a bootlicker that you buy “bogus claims” as an excuse for insurance denying people life-saving treatment? You’re right, rate is just one data point. One I think you purposefully ignored now.
minus-squarebluGill@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoI’ve been around long enough to know that people who want to make a point will yell about one number in their favor and ignore everything else.
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoHow’s that leather taste mate?
Rate is just one data point. I’m back again to asking for in depth analysis. Do people who use UHC submit more bogus claims than those who use other insurance for example? There are many more important questions that need to be asked.
Holy moly, are you really this much of a bootlicker that you buy “bogus claims” as an excuse for insurance denying people life-saving treatment?
You’re right, rate is just one data point. One I think you purposefully ignored now.
I’ve been around long enough to know that people who want to make a point will yell about one number in their favor and ignore everything else.
How’s that leather taste mate?