MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoThe torque better not be too strong with this onelemmy.todayimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1940arrow-down119
arrow-up1921arrow-down1imageThe torque better not be too strong with this onelemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareKitathalla@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 days agoSlight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
minus-squareevergreen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoCorrect. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.