• spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “It’s not about cost.” Running an imperfect system expensively is not grounds to gut the system entirely.

    I don’t believe it’s not about cost and in my opinion you’re silly to believe it. You fell for propaganda and even worse it was propaganda on Joe Rogan of all places lmao.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Okay agree to disagree. I think meta is a company/business and obviously is looking at cost vs impact etc. And they deemed it to expensive to continue fighting a losing battle. If you don’t like it don’t use meta which I’m sure you don’t. But I don’t blame them at all for coming to this decision and I don’t think they are responsible to teach you right from wrong either. Like I said it’s not their fault a third of the world uses their services everyday. They made a great social media site and its become one of if not the most popular on earth. But that’s all they are, a social media business. I wouldn’t blame a smaller business that came to similar conclusions that just impact less people. It happens all the time it’s just I think meta gets all the attention because it’s the biggest one. But it’s still just a company making money at the end of the day.