There is no evidence that the proposed meeting even took place or which admins were invited, let alone that attendees would be required to sign an NDA.
Its not based on nothing. Its based on reports from multiple mastodon admins and assumed since the lemmy.world/mastodon.world admin is a huge server admin and is yet to deny signing any NDA like others have.
Its clearly not evidence but I’ll take his silence as a warrant canary not being updated until he states he hasn’t signed an NDA.
The evidence is fairly nondescript, though. At the very most, assuming that the rumors are true and an NDA was signed, the most likely explanation for that is that Meta didn’t want details of their new product leaking out before launch.
All this conjecture and insinuation that Mastodon.World admins have done something underhand/shady is just hysterical nonsense.
There is no evidence that the proposed meeting even took place or which admins were invited, let alone that attendees would be required to sign an NDA.
Stop spreading FUD based on nothing.
Its not based on nothing. Its based on reports from multiple mastodon admins and assumed since the lemmy.world/mastodon.world admin is a huge server admin and is yet to deny signing any NDA like others have.
Its clearly not evidence but I’ll take his silence as a warrant canary not being updated until he states he hasn’t signed an NDA.
The evidence is fairly nondescript, though. At the very most, assuming that the rumors are true and an NDA was signed, the most likely explanation for that is that Meta didn’t want details of their new product leaking out before launch.
All this conjecture and insinuation that Mastodon.World admins have done something underhand/shady is just hysterical nonsense.