• FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d personally prefer the use of manure or animal dung instead of spray paint as the former is a bit more natural and should not create any issue to the environment.

    Furthermore, if used in the right quantity and of the right quality manure can permanently stick to a porous surface thus rendering the entire yatch, car, jet, helicopter or transport mean completely unusable for a very long time. For this application I’d suggest the use of carnivore ejections as these are usually far more unbearable than those coming from herbivores.

    Anyway, keep up the good fight!!

    • Trundle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you, FabioTNO, for providing much-needed insight on the topic of fecal adhesion and permanence.

      You seem to know your shit.

    • cactus@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think yachts and helicopters are made up of porous surfaces, quite the opposite. Except for fabric parts of course

    • wheelie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be more inclined to use road marking paint (the really thick stuff you boil to prepare) catapulted onto the deck. Or just burn it down.

      Permanent damage is the only language they understand.

      • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Too bad that you wouldn’t be damaging just the leisure of a super rich person but also the environment around it.

        We need to find ways to hurt them without damaging the environment worst than they are already doing if possible

        • james1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The impacts of the environmental damage are not necessarily worse than the environmental damage from not sinking superyachts in the long term, if it becomes a common enough threat that rich people no longer feel secure in owning them.

          The concern with anything too destructive is with the property and safety of workers on board imo, not the ships themselves.

          I’d recommend Andreas Malm’s book How to Blow Up a Pipeline if you want to hear more about the reasoning for this sort of thing.

          • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve heard about this book before but I haven’t had the chance to read it yet.

            Definitely a reading I must add to my list, I’ll try to find a copy of it to correct this lack of information.

            Thanks a lot for the suggestion!!

      • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Have you ever tried to remove shit from a (both natural and artificial )leather jacket? Expecially shit moist with urine?

        I don’t see anybody using the soft and comfortable sofas usually provided to these boats for a very long time

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do as you wish. I am just saying the decks are designed to be hosed down. Pretty much everything on a ship is. You spray it and it finds it way to the disgusting bottom tanks.